![]() |
Quote:
Like you though seems kinda bullshit, I got trapped in a 100 zone going 148. I won't comment on how that zone is now a 110km/h zone after the speed limit reviews last year. Seems like this kid should get a way harsher penalty than what I did, considering he pretty much doubled how far over the limit I was going... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
in effect you are guilty before proven innocent (in a court of law), since you must pay the towing/impound fees regardless of if you dispute your ticket and win |
Well I mean shit, if radar says 145 and the speed limits 100, it's a pretty clear cut case. |
ya but police are for enforcement and not punishment. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
(According to Solomon's Curve, going 145km/h is safer than going 100km/h when everybody else is going 130km/h) If you drive new cars nowadays...145km/h feels just like 100km/h Most people settle at 135km/h range on Autobahn on slower lane as well. CBC Reported that 130km/h limit is common in Europe: Three in 4 drivers travel above the speed limit on Canada's busiest highway - Technology & Science - CBC News In BC, Coquihalla Highway for example, the 85th percentile is 127km/h. So the speed limit should be approx. 130km/h. The 100km/h speed limit in BC that you're talking about has nothing to do with road engineering and safety. If you go 145km/h on 100km/h zone, you will get your car impounded, for going 15km/h faster than the flow of traffic, just because the "speed limit" happen to be 100km/h but safe speed/flow of traffic is not. Those 100km/h road may be raised to 120km/h perhaps 130km/h in the future too for safety reasons. When that happens, you would wonder WTF was that impound all about. |
Quote:
|
Driving is a privilege, not a right. If you can not follow the rules associated with driving you simply should not be doing it. IMO, if you are cough at 200km/h on ANY roads in Canada it should not simply be an immediate road side suspension and some fines. It should be your license GONE and never to return. |
Quote:
If the province wanted then they could simply start up there own yards if they wanted no? Point is, RCMP job is to enforce the rules, not to store vehicles. It is outsourced to a 3rd party for a reason. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Then he posts something like this... :drunk: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How many people do you see on the highway driving at 130-145km/h (suggested safest speed is generally 130-135km/h) suddenly flying away like that? or losing control like that if they're actually paying attention on the road driving? If you ever do that on the street with heavily modified car like that, it's called street racing. I'm not saying everyone should be street racing everywhere. Don't get them mixed up. |
Quote:
People will adjust their speed accordingly anyways. |
Quote:
However driving at 100km/h where flow of traffic is 130km/h is more dangerous than going 145km/h. The biggest problem is the behavior, not the speed itself and we all know this. North Americans have this culture of texting, talking on the phone, eating burgers, etc...while driving. In Germany, people don't do that kind of stuff. What if you make Coquihalla Highway's speed limitless like Autobahn? I wonder how many people will still decided to get distracted by other stuff. (I'm not saying that accident rate will necessarily go down by making limitless speed limit, but my personal speculation is that people's behavior will change and keep their mind on the road more just like in Germany) The car needs to travel fast in order for it to be useful. The question is, what's the safest speed that less accidents would occur? Because if they actually want to make 0 traffic death in BC, they can just set the speed limit of 5km/h in the city and 10km/h on the highway. This way it's pretty guaranteed that traffic death will become a thing of past. But in reality, we need to allow cars to travel fast enough to be realistically useful. If 130km/h limit is safer than 100km/h limit on some highways, they should just do it. Same as Marine Drive, if 80km/h limit is safer than 50km/h limit, they should just do it. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^ it's also harder to keep your car road legal. The German inspections are extremely strict, I'm guessing a lot of Canadian cars wouldn't come close to passing a German inspection. That still doesn't make them perfectly safe though, there are some pretty big pile ups on the autobahns. Then there's the matter of everybody adjusting to expecting to see cars coming up at high rates of speed, so people don't pull out without looking like they already do. It's bad enough having it happen when you're going 20 km/h faster than someone, it'd be a lot worse with a bigger differential. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The reason why so many JDM cars in Canada suck is because those cars failed Japanese government's inspection and lost the Certificate of Roadworthiness. Needless to say, those cars are much cheaper for importers' to buy. |
I wonder if the speed of traffic flow slowed down after the introduction of 7 day impound for excessive speeding. I bet it made no difference. As "Speed Kills Your Pocketbook" was briefly mentioning, police officers seem to have problem understanding and differentiating the difference between "daily commuters" and "street racers/DUI drivers" They legitimately think that writing lots of ticket to daily commuters that are following flow of traffic (or maybe slightly faster) will prevent street racing and DUI, or some stupid teenagers doing stunt driving on the road. As so many people have been saying, it's not speed that kills, it's the behavior. Those daily commuters have nothing to do with street racers or DUI drivers. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net