![]() |
When can and can't you do a U-Turn at an Intersection? Always wonder about this... Is there any general rule when you can or can't do a U-turn at an intersection? (i.e. with traffic lights) I have seen intersections with signs saying "U-Turn Permitted", and "No U-Turn Permitted" And that actually gets me confused... If there are only signs that said "U-turn permitted", I would assume every intersection without the sign = no U-turn. And if there are only signs that said "No U-Turn Permitted", I would assume every intersection without sign = Ok to U-Turn assuming it is safe. So what is the rule when there are no signs at the intersection? Can you still do a U-turn assuming the traffic is perfectly clear and safe to do so? |
Depends where you live. I grew up in Richmond. Do them whenever and wherever you want. Doesn't matter if the lights red even Edit: in for real answer tho |
Quote:
If there is a sign that says "U-Turn permitted" it is permitted, all other times it is not permitted. This is contrary to the US where Unless there is a sign that says "U-Turn not permitted", it is permitted. |
Quote:
|
Basically from my understanding, you shall NOT U-turn at: - any intersection with a traffic signal (so that just means the No U-turn sign at any signalled intersection is just redundant). - a curve in the road - on a hill where you can't be seen from 150 m away - any other place with a No U-turn sign - anywhere in a business district except for an un-signalled intersection - and anywhere else local bylaw prohibits U-turns So that means... U-turns are allowed, except for the above, anywhere as long as you don't interfere with traffic, LOL Quote:
|
So if there are no signs at an intersection w/ traffic light = u-turn not legal (even if the condition is perfectly safe and you have unlimited visibility) Yea, then I wonder why they put all those U-turn not permitted sign in the first place. We don't see "right turn permitted on red light" sign on intersection because it is pretty much implied it is okay to right turn on red assuming it is safe, unless otherwise posted. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know Richmond is a no-no, Vancouver not sure and Surrey has places made for uturns |
Motor Vehicle Act section 168 as quoted above by Cone is correct. It applies all across British Columbia regardless of which City you're driving. Richmond is just appeasing to stupid people that can't accept accountability and want a sign for everything. Reminds me of a side story regarding needy people and signs. Guy at the gym is using the common hair dryer to blow dry his balls. There was a complaint made to the staff so staff tell him off. Guy says there's no sign saying I can't use the hair dryer for that. Use some common sense. There's also no sign to say you can't take a shit in the sink... |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Even if there is a sign, they'll say "I didn't see the sign" |
The intersection at King George and 64 ave has a sign allowing U turns for vehicles under 5 tonnes. |
Goddamn "no uturn" signs in Richmond got me a ticket a couple of years ago. If it's not allowed in BC, then either don't put any of these signs up or slab one on EVERY intersection please. I know it is the driver's responsibilities to know the rules and abide by them, but these signs send a confusing signal as to whether it is legal or not. |
Quote:
|
well shit, i've always thought u can U-turn anywhere unless there's a sign saying you can't :fuckthatshit: |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net