THE MUMMY
 

tom cruise remake...

[edit] full trailer#1:

but why... the original was so good

just the first movie. maybe the second (cgi was terrible).

after that... all crap.

i'm in just for Sofia Boutella :thumbsup:

Damn, it's been 15+ years already. Time flies.

I feel old.

Originals were among the worst movies I can recall from the era. I remember these starting my hatred for shitty CG in movies. The reboot will be even worse, I'm sure

i liked it, it was fun at the time. yes the cg sucked, especially the rock in the 3rd one lol.

Damn feeling old when shit I watched in highschool are getting remakes now lol

Can you list some movies where you think the CG is good, I can only remember you dumping on movies for shitty CG lol

benny was the best...

the chinese :lol

Any movie with CG that wasn't noticeable is good in my books. Movies like Edge of Tomorrow have lots of CG, but it's not the whole point of the movie. It doesn't take over to the point where it's distracting. They just use it to create characters and scenery that wouldn't fit in if done with practical effects.

The main issue is when practical effects, scenery, and actors are replaced by shitty CG. Most Marvel movies fall into this category easily, some more than others. Some are really bad, like Avengers, where they constantly replaces humans with poorly animated models. Some are fine, like Deadpool. Some work well, like Guardians of the Galaxy. Some are in between, with bad parts and really good ones, like Dr Strange. Not picking on Marvel, just coming up with some examples, and it's easy to stay within one producer.

Can they really not come up with better ideas than remaking 15 year old movies? I can see the aspect of remaking some really old school stuff that's like 30+ years old to reintroduce it to a new generation, but a 15 year old movie? Come on!

Is this being marketed as a "remake"? Or is the movie just called The Mummy?

Looks pretty good.

Surely, you didn't expect Disney to buy Marvel and Lucasfilm for billions and do nothing with them. :lawl:

Avatar must be a top cgi based movie

am i the only one who thought the eye effects were stupid

Forrest Gump

uhm the ones with brendan fraser werent the originals... rofl those were a remake too of the 1932 classic starring Boris Karloff

Tom Cruise is also doing a Van Helsing movie, he was originally going to be in the one that Hugh Jackman was in but scheduling or something forced Tom to pass on it

full trailer#1:

That's the difference though, the original was made in 1932, then the Brendan Fraser remake can so many years later. Just saying, in my opinion, that they shouldn't be remade so few years apart.

Now after seeing the trailer for this new movie, seems like it's nothing like the Brendan Fraser movie. Perhaps they should have given it a different name? Looks decent.

this is a much more modernized reboot. Totally different. I don't know what the typical reboot gap is; but from my memory, Batman and The hulk were one that were rebooted within the shortest amount of gaps

And this one:
Spider-Man 3 (2007)
The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)