REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Gaming, Computer Tech & Electronics (https://www.revscene.net/forums/gaming-computer-tech-electronics_32/)
-   -   Qualcomm Snapdragon chips to run Windows 10 (https://www.revscene.net/forums/711194-qualcomm-snapdragon-chips-run-windows-10-a.html)

DragonChi 12-10-2016 06:52 PM

Qualcomm Snapdragon chips to run Windows 10
 
https://www.engadget.com/2016/12/07/...napdragon-arm/

Get ready to have some cheap tablet and 2in1 computers fellas!

Manic! 12-10-2016 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DragonChi (Post 8808924)
https://www.engadget.com/2016/12/07/...napdragon-arm/

Get ready to have some cheap tablet and 2in1 computers fellas!

Cheaper than $80 for a tablet?

DragonChi 12-10-2016 11:43 PM

lol probably not.

What I mean is, instead of paying 1000 dollar range for a atom tablet, a Snapdragon SoC should provide the same performance for the same thing at a 400 dollar range.

!MiKrofT 12-11-2016 09:51 AM

Looks like they might beat Apple to be the first to use arm for a desktop os

godwin 12-11-2016 02:42 PM

RISC will always have a deficient vs x86 when it comes to Windows.. I mean there WAS an DEC Alpha version of Windows NT (as close to ARM as Microsoft got).

Basic browsering maybe okay but when we now offload most things with WebGL, there will be a deficit. especially ARM is always down on FP performance.

With Microsoft adopt and dump schemes (Windows Phone, UWP etc) .. we will see how long this will last.

Qualcomm is always more expensive than other ARM licensees (eg MediaTek)

asian_XL 12-11-2016 03:13 PM

I believe MS realized other than Office and Photoshop and Gaming, they have no real advantage, most users have found android or OSX are better platform to settle and develop.

DragonChi 12-11-2016 04:03 PM

I didn't even know that they were trying to get OSX onto their ARM based processors. Maybe they're not too far off.

While these SoCs don't have instruction sets of desktop processors, the video in the link shows decent performance. I suppose we will have to see. The article does point out the failed windows RT as well. I'm totally ignorant on what the difference between RISC and CISC is.

Yeah, that's what I was hoping for, that I could get MS Excel, and Word, on a tablet. The android versions aren't all that great. After that I'd use google maps on android only.

godwin 12-12-2016 04:25 AM

Anything that needs to run through Java will not be as good as native apps.. that's Android's biggest problem and was a historical design constraint. Back in the day, they didn't have the time. There are rumours Google is trying to fix it, but it takes time. Not to mention it is against Google's interest to create something that is not "always on", so it will never be quite like Windows, OSX etc.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DragonChi (Post 8809081)
I didn't even know that they were trying to get OSX onto their ARM based processors. Maybe they're not too far off.

While these SoCs don't have instruction sets of desktop processors, the video in the link shows decent performance. I suppose we will have to see. The article does point out the failed windows RT as well. I'm totally ignorant on what the difference between RISC and CISC is.

Yeah, that's what I was hoping for, that I could get MS Excel, and Word, on a tablet. The android versions aren't all that great. After that I'd use google maps on android only.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net