REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   Jagmeet Singh wins the NDP leadership race (https://www.revscene.net/forums/713475-jagmeet-singh-wins-ndp-leadership-race.html)

welfare 10-15-2017 11:28 PM

And believe me, I get it. The resolution to every single problem on this planet is actually very simple.
All it would take is for every single human being to say 'i am your brother/sister. I love you. How can I help'.
Unfortunately, human nature is not so collective.

MG1 10-16-2017 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8866808)
All it would take is for every single human being to say 'god bless'.

fixt...............

god bless

$_$ 10-16-2017 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8866807)
My friend, I hate to be the one to break this to you. but regardless of the social structure chosen, the conclusion is the same; the vast majority of the population working for a very small number of people at the top.
That is the thumbnail sketch of mankind

Yeah, so maybe instead of doing the same old thing every time and expecting different results, we should try something new.

welfare 10-16-2017 06:53 AM

I haven't heard anything "new" suggested. By anyone

Bouncing Bettys 10-16-2017 07:56 AM

Jagmeet Singh uses his race card early in the game:

Jagmeet Singh Suggests CBC's Insistent Questioning About Alleged Terrorist Was Racist
"The fact that this is something that I have to say is troublesome."

Spoiler!

Jagmeet Singh Suggests CBC's Insistent Questioning About Alleged Terrorist Was Racist

welfare 10-16-2017 08:37 AM

LMAO.
I'm not even gonna bother

welfare 10-16-2017 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $_$ (Post 8866791)
I'm glad we agree on something.

I think what I'm getting at though, is that the current idea of "work" for sustainability doesn't resonate very well for me. A recent TED talk I watched said that 60% of people didn't enjoy their jobs; and of those, IIRC 30% hated their jobs. That's a very large portion of the population that spend the majority of their lives doing something that they do not like. We can talk about "choices" and opportunities all day, but that's just the reality of the situation right now (even with opportunities given). The reason I'm both excited and terrified of AI is that I'm hoping it'll free up human capital to allow us to become unshackled to this type of lifestyle, but only if we apply it properly.

Have you ever asked yourself 'what is wealth? What is poverty?'

Wealth and poverty are not actually measured by income. Though many like to think of it as being that two dimensional.
These are actually states of mind.
If you look at someone living on the poverty line in Canada, they would actually be considered living in conditions of great wealth by Nigerian standards.
Or if you look at conditions of poverty in the 1930's, they were drastically worse than what we consider poverty today.
Of course, the same can be said of wealth. A person living in great wealth in a country with a very low GDP would be thought of as living in poverty in a more wealthy country.
It is all relative to our direct environment and what we've become accustomed to. It is all in our minds.

When you see immigrants come to Canada from war torn, poor countries. Countries where some could only wish to have a job. Any job. How do you think they feel about their job here? Do you think they are dissatisfied? Do they hate their job?

I'm reminded of a brilliant quote that really captures the essence of what I mean.
"The richest ones are not those who have the most, but those who need the least"

From what I gather, you believe the issue is simple; if people don't like their job, rid them of that job. If people need/want money, give them money.
And I believe the issue is as complex as human beings themselves.

$_$ 10-17-2017 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8866931)
Have you ever asked yourself 'what is wealth? What is poverty?'

Wealth and poverty are not actually measured by income. Though many like to think of it as being that two dimensional.
These are actually states of mind.
If you look at someone living on the poverty line in Canada, they would actually be considered living in conditions of great wealth by Nigerian standards.
Or if you look at conditions of poverty in the 1930's, they were drastically worse than what we consider poverty today.
Of course, the same can be said of wealth. A person living in great wealth in a country with a very low GDP would be thought of as living in poverty in a more wealthy country.
It is all relative to our direct environment and what we've become accustomed to. It is all in our minds.

When you see immigrants come to Canada from war torn, poor countries. Countries where some could only wish to have a job. Any job. How do you think they feel about their job here? Do you think they are dissatisfied? Do they hate their job?

I'm reminded of a brilliant quote that really captures the essence of what I mean.
"The richest ones are not those who have the most, but those who need the least"

From what I gather, you believe the issue is simple; if people don't like their job, rid them of that job. If people need/want money, give them money.
And I believe the issue is as complex as human beings themselves.

Everything is indeed relative. Sure, we can compare ourselves to Nigeria and pat ourselves on the back and say hey good job. But the question is, should we? We should always strive to be better, and not compare ourselves to worse. If that was the case, we will stop working to innovate and improve and just say "we're already better off than a decade ago, this is good enough!"

But it's never good enough, and it shouldn't. In my opinion, the whole point of life is to maximize the human experience. Our current framework of "jobs" don't provide the same sense of satisfaction that it used to. And it very well might use to provide satisfaction to previous generations; but it doesn't now. That's why we need to try to find ways to fix it. And again, circling back, a lot of jobs simply won't exist.

Jmac 10-17-2017 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bouncing Bettys (Post 8866833)
Jagmeet Singh uses his race card early in the game:

Jagmeet Singh Suggests CBC's Insistent Questioning About Alleged Terrorist Was Racist
"The fact that this is something that I have to say is troublesome."


Jagmeet Singh Suggests CBC's Insistent Questioning About Alleged Terrorist Was Racist

How isn't it racist, exactly?

This guy kept asking him to condemn the actions of some members of his race/religion regarding an event that happened when he was 5 years old. Some see the alleged bomber as innocent and have posters of him. His response was that he condemns any and all violence, which wasn't good enough for the reporter.

He's only being questioned on this because of his race and religion.

welfare 10-17-2017 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $_$ (Post 8867158)
Our current framework of "jobs" don't provide the same sense of satisfaction that it used to. And it very well might use to provide satisfaction to previous generations; but it doesn't now. That's why we need to try to find ways to fix it

Ok but why is there a lack of satisfaction? The jobs didn't get worse. So why have the people changed?
Isn't understanding the answer to that question more important than pacifying the people?

welfare 10-17-2017 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jmac (Post 8867164)
How isn't it racist, exactly?

This guy kept asking him to condemn the actions of some members of his race/religion regarding an event that happened when he was 5 years old. Some see the alleged bomber as innocent and have posters of him. His response was that he condemns any and all violence, which wasn't good enough for the reporter.

He's only being questioned on this because of his race and religion.

Well firstly, it's not racist because sykh isn't a race.

Secondly, people parading with posters of the alleged weren't doing so because they thought he was innocent.

Jmac 10-17-2017 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8867166)
Well firstly, it's not racist because sykh isn't a race.

Secondly, people parading with posters of the alleged weren't doing so because they thought he was innocent.

Ah, I didn't realize that Singh had no race. My bad.

And, obviously, these raceless people who have posters, I mean, every politician out there has had the same repeated questions asked to them in every interview, right? And no answer they gave was good enough for the reporter, right?

welfare 10-17-2017 09:32 PM

Right. So sykh is a race, not a religion. My bad.

Jmac 10-17-2017 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8867175)
Right. So sykh is a race, not a religion. My bad.

welfare deflects as usual. This isn't about whether or not sikh is a race or a religion and you know it, you troll.

welfare 10-17-2017 09:49 PM

If you're not intelligent enough to see what Mr. Singh is doing here, I'm not going to bother explaining

minoru_tanaka 10-18-2017 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8867180)
If you're not intelligent enough to see what Mr. Singh is doing here, I'm not going to bother explaining

Those people he's being asked to condemn, I'm going to racistly assume, are probably votes that he is counting on. The reporting is trying to force him to commit political suicide.

But. if he wasn't an Indian guy, nobody would be asking him this question

CivicBlues 10-18-2017 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8867166)
Well firstly, it's not racist because sykh isn't a race.

Secondly, people parading with posters of the alleged weren't doing so because they thought he was innocent.

Oh ffs, I'm sick of seeing this dog whistle from closet racists such as yourself.

"Chinese are all scammers"
"I'm not racist cause China isn't a race!"

"Muslims are all terrorists"
"Muslims aren't a race!"

and wtf is "sykh"?

welfare 10-18-2017 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CivicBlues (Post 8867234)
Oh ffs, I'm sick of seeing this dog whistle from closet racists such as yourself.

"Chinese are all scammers"
"I'm not racist cause China isn't a race!"

"Muslims are all terrorists"
"Muslims aren't a race!"

and wtf is "sykh"?

i don't recall making any stereotypical blanket statements about race.
but thanks for passing judgment

welfare 10-18-2017 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minoru_tanaka (Post 8867213)
Those people he's being asked to condemn, I'm going to racistly assume, are probably votes that he is counting on. The reporting is trying to force him to commit political suicide.

But. if he wasn't an Indian guy, nobody would be asking him this question

the reporter asked a question regarding a faction of sikhs who believe in the separatist movement, and consider parmar a hero for his alleged terrorist attack.
and the only discourse of mr. singh is to cry 'racist', because the question made him uncomfortable.
i guess softball is the only sport allowed when it comes to identity politics

Manic! 10-18-2017 12:53 PM

Andrew Scheers father is a deacon of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Ottawa. The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Ottawa paid tens of thousands of dollars to keep children who where abused quiet and not go to the police.

Maybe someone should ask Scheer about that and also ask if he denounces the Roman Catholic church, a church that systematically abused tens of thousands of children and then tried to cover it up.

CivicBlues 10-18-2017 02:04 PM

Don't forget to ask newly re-elected Naheed Nenshi about his thoughts on ISIS. It's not racist to do so, cause Muslims ain't a race!!

OnTheRun 10-18-2017 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CivicBlues (Post 8867299)
Don't forget to ask newly re-elected Naheed Nenshi about his thoughts on ISIS. It's not racist to do so, cause Muslims ain't a race!!

OT, but Calgary's municipal elections are going to go down along with the 2013 BC provincial election, Brexit and the 2014 Ontario election as the archetype of political polls being mistaken. I've always wondered how elections in France always get it so consistently right when polling in Anglophone countries is full of endless fails.

CivicBlues 10-18-2017 03:10 PM

^ I didn't follow the Calgary election closely. What were the polling numbers?

OnTheRun 10-18-2017 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CivicBlues (Post 8867316)
^ I didn't follow the Calgary election closely. What were the polling numbers?

Polls consistently showed Bill Smith with a double digit percentage point lead over Nenshi, up to election day. The biggest lead gave Smith nearly half of all voters (Smith 48%, Nenshi 31%, Chabot 6%, 13% undecided) and a 36-point lead among the 18-34 vote. The final tally was Nenshi 51.41%, Smith 43.73%, Chabot 3.08%

welfare 10-18-2017 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manic! (Post 8867286)
Andrew Scheers father is a deacon of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Ottawa. The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Ottawa paid tens of thousands of dollars to keep children who where abused quiet and not go to the police.

Maybe someone should ask Scheer about that and also ask if he denounces the Roman Catholic church, a church that systematically abused tens of thousands of children and then tried to cover it up.

No one asked Singh to denounce Sikhism.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CivicBlues (Post 8867299)
Don't forget to ask newly re-elected Naheed Nenshi about his thoughts on ISIS. It's not racist to do so, cause Muslims ain't a race!!

I wonder how difficult it would be for him to denounce ISIS if he were asked.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net