Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicBlues
(Post 8932813)
wow it's almost as if Slogans and Memes =/= commonly available food products. BabyRageBabyRageBabyRage |
wow it's almost as if Slogans and Memes, and even commonly available food products, can act as symbols and have whatever meaning we put to them. It is foolish and even dangerous and irresponsible to make guilt by association condemnations based on flimsy connections. For example: Pokimane, a non-political twitch streamer, recently had her face painted like one of her favourite memes.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/av31_TZwA78/hqdefault.jpg
Guess she is a white nationalist now (she's Moroccan). I hope Antifa doesn't bash her head in.
The point I was making, is that it doesn't matter if some person or group you oppose starts liking something you like or using innocuous phrases, they don't own them. What matters is the context YOU give them. Shying away from things and letting them have them or coming up with alternative phrases like "the N word" only serve to put power behind their negative connotations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicBlues
(Post 8932837)
Really? do we seriously have to get into this? No Welfare, you personally have not oppressed me or any other Asians, Blacks, Latinos, First Nations. You've certainly taken hours of our lives that we'll never get back but that's another post....
But you seriously don't believe that centuries of European peoples being the colonizer and top dog has done nothing with regards to the power structures that remain in this country others in the West? Not to mention your flippant attitude towards it which is a direct result of this power imbalance. Jeeesus H. Christ. |
I am aware of no laws in place in Canada which prohibits minorities from attaining the highest positions in the country. The power structures in place have more to do with demographics than anything else. When the majority of the population is of European ancestry, expect the majority of positions of power to reflect that.
It's like the people who complained that the Academy Awards were racist because there weren't any black nominees, yet the percentage of black nominees was slightly above the percentage of their actual population. Or how women complained about how there weren't enough women elected to government, yet when you looked at the number of woman candidates, their representation reflected the population - their only problem was that no one was voting for them despite 51% of the population being female. Or how women complain about there not being enough women in top positions, yet forget that, unless you wait for those positions to open up due to retirement, you would have to kick a perfectly capable and experienced man out of that position before you saw a shift.
The argument can and has be made that European countries or those of European origin have structures and imbalances in place which reflect demographics. Can the same be said for other countries around the world? Those European origin countries tend to be near the top in most human development, economic, and human rights/freedom indexes when compared to the rest of the world. So where is the condemnation of those other countries? Why are so many people from around the world choosing to leave their homeland for Canada and the West if they are so racists and lacking in opportunities?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicBlues
(Post 8932891)
Welfare if you looked up the word clueless in the dictionary there’d be a picture of you. |
Condescension and now insults. Others who are blocking people they disagree with. The true signs of a winning argument.