![]() |
Two NYPD officers get away with raping suspect https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49522500 Quote:
tldr two cops arrest 18yr old for having marijuana on her, rape her in the squad car, and let her go, she goes to the hospital, where they find both officers DNA on her, not considered rape because her credibility is highly suspect, and there was a loophole which allowed officers to rape handcuffed suspects at the time.... |
Was it rape though or did she cut a deal? It said in exchange for her release.. If she said “hey fellas let me go and I’ll let you take turns” is that rape? I find that scenario more plausible than two cops just raping her and letting her go.. they wouldn’t leave loose ends like that. Obviously not saying it’s ok but man.. if she made a deal then cried rape that’s BS |
Cellphone data didn't corroborate her story. This article is missing a lot of information on this case |
Quote:
Like a person that's kidnapped pleading to the kidnapper to let them go and they can have their way with them it's still rape There was just that insane "loophole" so your line of reasoning is what got them off :heckno: |
Hey I’m not trying to reason with it at all... just saying she may have offered consensual sex in exchange for freedom and then said it was rape. Hell she could have demanded the cuffs stay on! Anyway.. like I said it’s not ok but in my eyes, regardless of who is in power, if a deal is made that includes sex between adults for x,y or z, then there are no grounds to use the word rape. To me, rape is one person saying no and the other proceeding to perform the act against the other’s will. |
Quote:
Maybe that's her kink FeelsGoodMan:shefap: |
Quote:
|
her account from an older news article Quote:
|
^ if true, that is rape. Thanks for clarifying. |
Yeah it's not up to the police officers to decide how to serve justice. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Like what ever happened to just reporting a story with as much pertinent detail as possible? Isn't that supposed to be their job? The rape charge was dropped because her credibility was ruined when she lied in testimony about the "ride through hell". The cell phone data determined that ride she described never took place. I don't know what happened. I'm just saying the article is leaving out critical details. I'm not trying to defend what they did in any way. And yes, i think this "loophole" was completely insane. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But people should be able to form opinion based on all the facts. I just think it reflects poorly to omit details regardless. |
100% agree. I just wouldn't want to be the guy who goes "well actually" about a couple rapists, unless it's actually to refute claims |
|
could've been anyone's daughter these pigs got off way too easy...can of worms with the supposedly rape loophole |
Quote:
Quote:
Edit: same judge Quote:
|
It sounds like she needs to sue privately to get what she deserves. It won't give jail time to the perps but at least someone is paying a price for this action. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net