|
So much for integrity and whatever... |
WTF dude? Did you even actually read what was written in the Meta letter? While the 3 points that this House Judiciary GOP account mentioned were all factually true, the way they are presented together is clearly meant to mislead. I don't have much to say about #1 since the remark is simply far too general to make any reasonable comment on. Depending on a lot of other contextual and background information, #1 could be spun into a good, bad, neutral thing, or anything in between. #2 is kind of similar, although I would also say that FB pretty much did this since their early days, and if any FB user were to claim that they didn't know that's what FB did, they'd be idiots. #3 is particularly meaningless. It happened because on FB's own accord, they were trying to fact check the news. IMO for a credible news / social media platform, presenting credible information is more important than delivering that new information at breakneck speed. And because of that, it isn't even about free speech. Assuming that Twitter account is managed by official GOP staff, it's a shame that the GOP is intentionally trying to mislead people. FailFish |
Quote:
|
Guess we’re gonna ignore Elon’s totally biased version of free speech via X and Russian oligarch funding too… Silicon Valley money is all extremely right wing by nature which likely includes Zuckerberg et al anyway. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Zuckerberg himself admitted that members of the administration "including the White House" pressured them into censoring content. Now, regardless of what constitutes as disinformation or whatever... such suppression of voices, when you read this admission and watch this video Where Kamala Harris focuses her campaign message on "freedom"... if that's not hypocrisy, I don't know what hypocrisy actually means. They are basically saying "you are free to say whatever as long as it fits our narrative." What kind of freedom is that? It's like what the Chinese official said during the British interview recently: "you can have an opinion on Chinese leader as long as it's positive." :fuckthatshit: |
If you listened to ANY of the DNC, every single speaker stressed ad nauseum about representing all Americans even if they don't agree politically. Did a single person in the RNC say anything even remotely like that? I'll wait. Your interpretation of someone's words isn't gospel, what you've written above is just your opinion of what she said with no factual or actualized basis. |
Quote:
Yes, RNC can be fucked up at times, but at least they mostly do what they say. You think they are a bunch of conservative and religious-nutjobs? Oh... I agree. But that's better than the hypocrites at DNC that does exactly what they are so up against. They said it's about freedom, and yet the basic freedom of speech seems to be the first thing they are up against. Censoring and suppressing META group is not something I say or some conspiracy theory that I believe in. META's own head honcho came out to say about that. And if you read through the letter, has the Republicans ever been mentioned?! DNC said it's about democracy... what part of Kamala's nomination was democratic?! They basically handpicked her without giving a flying fuck about their nomination process. Yes, RNC is not perfect and their policies can be fucked up, but ask yourself... would you rather have someone who does what they believe in or someone who doesn't do anything what they say they believe in? That's why I said "so much for integrity".... which is another one of the big words DNC like to use, and something they have absolutely nothing to show for. |
wow dude just wow... to say that the GOP is the party of integrity.... you should have won a gold at paris in mental gymnastics. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hitler really believed in what he was doing and did exactly what he said he'd do too. At what point was there ever anyone not named Trump who was a serious nominee for the Republican party? Like... for the last 8-ish years too. There have been 3 democratic nominees in that time... and they were not the party that refused peaceful transfer of power... but they're somehow less about democracy?:fulloffuck: |
Quote:
|
I wish we had a fail counter next to profiles :lol |
If you click on someone's profile and go to Statistics you can see fail numbers/frequency stats hahaha My ratio is pretty good: Thanked 16,772 Times in 5,606 Posts Failed 278 Times in 179 Posts Half of my fails are probably from donk hahaha |
Quote:
What are you? Afraid of freedom and want to censor us? :yuno: |
I think it's cuz some individuals back in the day were fail-bombing all the threads... it was requested from the userbase not Skinny just making a decree |
Quote:
|
Wasn’t it like Dinosaur and his/her other clown S/O crying about fails? |
Quote:
|
Yeah we used to have it but people got really upset about it.. |
Reinstate !!!! |
Speaking of older RS features when's the last time someone got points? I feel like I haven't seen the little red flag of shame in ages. |
As expected I have the most fails by far. Thanks Donk! |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net