Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
07-07-2008, 11:54 PM
|
#1 | | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Van City
Posts: 137
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II Lens
Looking to purchase this lens to use for day to day photography mainly. Any opinions? Have you guys used this lens?
I currently am using the stock 18-55mm on my Nikon.
| 
|  | |
07-08-2008, 04:55 AM
|
#2 | | I don't get it
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 428
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I used it for a week for a vacation. It's definitely a good travel lens for non-fullframe cameras. Sharpness and everything is very good and basically like the Tamron 28-75mm. The only thing bad is that the focusing isn't that fast and hunts in low light.
Compared to your 18-55mm, you'll get better image quality and be able to use faster shutter speed at low light situations. You can also get blurry backgrounds easier.
| |
| | |
07-08-2008, 06:23 AM
|
#3 | | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Van City
Posts: 137
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
would a Sigma 18-200MM F3.5-6.3 DC LENS be a better option for me? It seems to be more versatile
| |
| | |
07-08-2008, 06:45 AM
|
#4 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
The Sigma would be more versatile but you would be scarficing image quality vs the Tamron.
| |
| | |
07-08-2008, 07:17 AM
|
#5 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Edmonton
Posts: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
you'd also be sacrificing a LOT of low-light photo opportunities. The Sigma 18-200 will most likely be at f4.5 or 5.0 @ 50mm vs. the 2.8 of the Tammy.
I have the Tamron 18-50 and love it. It takes beautiful pictures, and it's a great all-around lens. Like someone said before, it sucks at low-light focusing...it hunts and then usually gives up lol. It's also noisy...sounds like a freaking sewing machine half the time...but, if you can live with that you won't regret buying the lens (I'm very happy with mine, despite it not being perfect). For the money I doubt you can find a better zoom.
| |
| | |
07-08-2008, 07:21 AM
|
#6 | | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Van City
Posts: 137
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
hi offroad.. where did you get your tamron? i don't see much retailers carrying tamron at all here in bc... also what is a good price for this lens?
low-light photo opportunities are usually night time shots right?
| |
| | |
07-08-2008, 07:32 AM
|
#7 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Edmonton
Posts: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeah, night time or indoors 
I got mine through sigma4less. I've had good experiences with them as well as B&H...if you want to buy local, I'm sure any photo store will have it (hell, even London Drugs can order it for you).
| |
| | |
07-09-2008, 12:34 AM
|
#8 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
| http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/pho/747858814.html
$350 is not bad of a price. I believe they go for $499 new. I'd consider it but I'm saving up for a 70-200.
| |
| | |
07-09-2008, 09:45 AM
|
#9 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: LuLu
Posts: 1,002
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by IMASA  | thats a good deal!
i got mine for 400 last month off some guy
loving it so far. Really good lens!
| |
| | |
07-09-2008, 11:10 AM
|
#10 | | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Van City
Posts: 137
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by IMASA | Niceee... that's a sweet deal. I will try to contact that dude.
| |
| | |
07-09-2008, 11:52 AM
|
#11 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,098
Thanked 206 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 16 Posts
|
This lens is sweet.. been wanting to get it for a while now.. but i don't use my camera enough to be buying lenses for it =/
| |
| | |
07-09-2008, 01:55 PM
|
#12 | | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
|
How good is this wide open? I've got the 17-40L...but I find that f4.0...well, I like fast apertures.
| |
| | |
07-09-2008, 06:38 PM
|
#13 | | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Van City
Posts: 137
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i believe this lens is F2.4 on all zoom ranges... clarity should be really good for this especially on closer range photographs...
Is Tamron or Sigma a better brand for this lens?
| |
| | |
07-09-2008, 08:04 PM
|
#14 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
It's a 2.8 on all zoom ranges, however, I doubt it would be sharp wide open. Probably sharp at F4, which is probably the same as your 17-40L. However, for the price, it can't be beat, I'd say it's the sharpest mid zoom available under $1000. I'm tempted to get that lens off CL, but I'll just have to make due with my 30 and 50 prime.
The Tamron is said to be better optically than the Sigma, however, the Sigma is available in HSM.
Nikon Mounts:
Tamron: http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/46-n...report--review
Sigma: http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/46-n...ab-test-report
Their verdict:
The Sigma offers lots of bangs for your bucks but the comparable Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 SP seems to be a better alternative.
Last edited by IMASA; 07-09-2008 at 08:05 PM.
| |
| | |
07-10-2008, 08:09 PM
|
#15 | | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Van City
Posts: 137
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
any other lens you guys suggest for a starter? Looking more to get sharper image than long range..
| |
| | |
07-10-2008, 08:45 PM
|
#16 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,113
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
|
theres nothing else at this price
| |
| | |
07-12-2008, 03:38 AM
|
#17 | | I don't get it
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 428
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'd consider the sigma for it's HSM. I think it would be more useful for you than the slightly better image quality of the tamron.
| |
| | |
07-14-2008, 04:08 PM
|
#18 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Edmonton
Posts: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
why would you doubt it's sharp wide open? no offence, but I hate it when ppl just make stuff up...one day when I'm not stupid busy I'll take a few shots and post them so you can really decide | |
| | |
07-14-2008, 09:23 PM
|
#19 | | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 199
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i own a 17-50mm f2.8 for a canon and i love it to death. its a good walk around and indoor lens. It definitely is not soft when wide open, a drawback to the lens is that it has high CA.
if you are looking for alternatives, you can grab sigma's 24-70 f2.8. Its a little poorer in relation to MTF 50 values BUT it definitely is more versatile than the 17-50.
it really all comes down to what you need. do you need a 17 (25.5mm) or would you enjoy more of the 24 (36mm)? both lenses are great! the great thing about the sigma is that it has HSM. the motor on the tamron really bothers me. i dont know why it does, but it does bother me.
| |
| | |
07-14-2008, 09:28 PM
|
#20 | | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Van City
Posts: 137
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
when you say High CA, what do you mean?
| |
| | |
07-14-2008, 09:39 PM
|
#21 | | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 199
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
CA is chromatic aberrations; a color shadow usually found when there is a high contrast transition such as the contrast of black and white. The color shadows are usually represented by what we call purple fringing. I can't really explain it well, but someone here can definitely explain it better.
| |
| | |
12-10-2008, 11:37 PM
|
#22 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Downtown
Posts: 453
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
17-44mm 2.8 Nikon is probably the sharpest of them all if u can afford it of course
| |
| | |
12-10-2008, 11:37 PM
|
#23 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Downtown
Posts: 453
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
ooops typo 17-55 dat is ....
| |
| | |
12-11-2008, 11:28 AM
|
#24 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
No, the 14-24 is the sharpest WA zoom out there now by a HUGE margin.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
12-29-2008, 12:50 AM
|
#25 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Downtown
Posts: 453
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
You're right the 14-24mm is sharper but I was referring to the range he's looking into ...
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:26 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
