Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |  |
02-23-2009, 09:05 PM
|
#1 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 193
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Monopod?
Which 3 aluminum monopods below do you people recommend? I do have an idea, but what are your thoughts/opinions.
- Compact Monopod 680B (min length: 51cm | max height: 154cm | weight: 0.83kg | max load: 10kg | 4 sections)
- Professional Monopod 681B (min length: 67cm | max height: 161cm | weight: 0.78kg | max load: 12kg | 3 sections)
- Monopod 679B (min length: 64cm | max height: 162cm | weight: 0.6kg | max load: 10kg | 3 sections)
I'm not interested in carbon fibre.
Thanks
Last edited by DeFactoGuy; 02-24-2009 at 06:42 AM.
|
| |
02-23-2009, 10:04 PM
|
#2 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,038
Thanked 166 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
I use the 681B with a 486RC2 ballhead.
I find it to be a really good combo, and being a 3-section monopod, I find it easy and quick to fully extend and use.
|
| |
02-23-2009, 10:15 PM
|
#3 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Wow...why is the shortest one the heaviest? I'd go with the 679B, as it might be the best height for you and is the lightest of the three.
Why no carbon fibre? Is it a price issue? How about a Magfibre one? I just bought a carbon fibre tripod, and the weight difference between an aluminum one is quite noticeable.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
02-24-2009, 01:01 AM
|
#4 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
jason i need a tripod, can you hook me up |
| |
02-24-2009, 06:30 AM
|
#5 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 193
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I have a Manfrotto carbon fibre tripod.
The Manfrotto carbon fibre monopod supports less load. It's 200grams lighter than aluminum. Sure, carbon fibre is rigid and dampens. But it does not justify 3x the cost of aluminum.
Nevertheless, it justifys the tripod.
The tubes diameter on the 679B is smaller than 680B and 681B. Is it a big deal besides less load?
"Wow...why is the shortest one the heaviest?" My assumption is being a 4 section monopod, the rest are 3 sections.
Last edited by DeFactoGuy; 02-24-2009 at 07:01 AM.
|
| |
02-24-2009, 12:26 PM
|
#6 | RS Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: kelowna
Posts: 7,303
Thanked 14 Times in 5 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i've got a 679B, havent used it all that much but when i do it works great?
|
| |
02-24-2009, 02:42 PM
|
#7 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,296
Thanked 1,292 Times in 312 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
I have the 680B, I wanted to smaller compacted size, the others just seemed too long to strap to my bag and walk around with.
|
| |
02-24-2009, 07:56 PM
|
#8 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 193
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
thanks.
|
| |
03-03-2009, 10:35 AM
|
#9 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,296
Thanked 1,292 Times in 312 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
| |
| |  |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 AM. |