REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-12-2009, 11:08 PM   #1
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,679
Thanked 10,395 Times in 3,918 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
China tries to annex territory



Quote:
A UN commission hoping to agree new maritime boundaries looks set to pit China against some of its neighbours.

China claims that a series of island chains in the South China Sea are part of its sovereign territory - but so do several other countries.

Most coastal states have to submit declarations on where they see their boundaries by 13 May.

A total of 48 nations have made full claims, and dozens more have made preliminary submissions.

"This is the sweep after which the maritime limits should be fixed... the final big adaptation of the world map," Harald Brekke, vice-chairman of the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, told Reuters news agency.

Under existing laws, a nation is allowed to exploit the resources on the seabed up to 200 nautical miles from its shoreline.

But some nations are able to extend their claims as a result of their landmasses - or continental shelf - extending into the sea.

But the exact limits of who can use what have not been put on an internationally agreed map - until now.

"We are seeing many overlapping submissions," Mr Brekke said...

But perhaps one of the most complicated areas to resolve is who owns what in the South China Sea, with China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Indonesia and Malaysia all having competing claims.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu says the country has indisputable sovereignty over disputed South China Sea islands.

He says this jurisdiction also extends to what is below the seabed - which is important because the South China Sea has valuable oil and gas reserves.

China has recently become more assertive in pushing its territorial claims in the area, according to the BBC's Michael Bristow in Beijing.

It has formally told the UN not to consider a similar claim from Vietnam.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8047206.stm
Advertisement
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 11:11 PM   #2
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
hk20000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,645
Thanked 1,357 Times in 508 Posts
Failed 229 Times in 105 Posts
wow that's pr-e-tty far from the shoreline there, China....
__________________
⇐ If I bothered replying, that's the face I made while I typed.

  • 2017 Alfa Romeo Giula Q4
  • 1999 Nissan Stagea 260RS 1 of 748
  • 1998 Nissan Laurel Medallion Club S drift boi
  • 1991 Lexus LS400 mint boi
  • 1989 Nissan S-Cargo cute boi
hk20000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 11:29 PM   #3
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 604
Posts: 1,049
Thanked 160 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000 View Post
wow that's pr-e-tty far from the shoreline there, China....
It makes more sense if the disputed islands are ceded to the Chinese.
Blinky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 07:43 AM   #4
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shaugnessy
Posts: 2,610
Thanked 481 Times in 168 Posts
Failed 730 Times in 91 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blinky View Post
It makes more sense if the disputed islands are ceded to the Chinese.
why? they're clearly closer to the other countries.
BNR32_Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 07:58 AM   #5
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
RacePace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Richmond
Posts: 11,187
Thanked 1,320 Times in 331 Posts
Failed 162 Times in 29 Posts
Wow, so pretty much Malaysia can't even send out a boat from most of their shore line. Bunch of assholes
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Girl
^ Yes it's sad when you stare at the shape of my penis through my overly skin tight jeans and not help but feel like a shameful little boy compared to me.
RacePace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 08:13 AM   #6
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: B.C.
Posts: 2,039
Thanked 101 Times in 57 Posts
Failed 44 Times in 20 Posts
why not ? US has Military Bases around the world anyways....

They think they are the shit, ruler of the world
silk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 08:16 AM   #7
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
DDauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: van
Posts: 131
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 13 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000 View Post
wow that's pr-e-tty far from the shoreline there, China....
The reason that China has claim over that sea area further off its homeland is because there are these islands in the South China Sea that are historically Chinese islands. There has been Chinese jurisdiction over these islands for thousands of years. Similiar to the US which has claim on the sea area near Hawaii..which is much further off US homeland

the US has military base in Korea, Guam island, Hawaii and in Okinawa...
even in Germany and Saudi Arabia.

Thats way more further than the US homeland.

Last edited by DDauge; 05-13-2009 at 08:21 AM.
DDauge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 09:26 AM   #8
My homepage has been set to RS
 
BoneThug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Van City
Posts: 2,230
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
are there military bases on those islands?
__________________
FS: 4 Michelin All season tires with 90% tread on one and 70% on the others, in great condition, good for any SUV. 235-65-R17
BoneThug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 09:31 AM   #9
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 604
Posts: 1,049
Thanked 160 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 14 Posts
Do I sense another Chinese thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by silk View Post
why not ? US has Military Bases around the world anyways....
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDauge View Post
The reason that China has claim over that sea area further off its homeland is because there are these islands in the South China Sea that are historically Chinese islands. There has been Chinese jurisdiction over these islands for thousands of years. Similiar to the US which has claim on the sea area near Hawaii..which is much further off US homeland

the US has military base in Korea, Guam island, Hawaii and in Okinawa...
even in Germany and Saudi Arabia.

Thats way more further than the US homeland.
ROFLcakes @ the ignorance.

Hawaii = undisputably part of US territory.
Guam = US possession

Military base =/= territorial possession with accompanying territorial rights. Bases are there via agreement.

These islands = disputed claim (I have no idea of the details around the claims).

Quote:
why? they're clearly closer to the other countries.
I agree. However, I can see why the claim would be made and why it could be advanced further through the Chinese claim to the islands.
Blinky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 10:18 AM   #10
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
DDauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: van
Posts: 131
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 13 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blinky View Post
Do I sense another Chinese thread





ROFLcakes @ the ignorance.

Hawaii = undisputably part of US territory.
Guam = US possession

Military base =/= territorial possession with accompanying territorial rights. Bases are there via agreement.

These islands = disputed claim (I have no idea of the details around the claims).



I agree. However, I can see why the claim would be made and why it could be advanced further through the Chinese claim to the islands.

China has claims over these islands because there has always been military and naval bases on those islands by the Chinese trending back thousands of years. However the largest island of them all, the Tai-Ping island is currently controlled by the Republic of China (Taiwan) military and is under Taiwan's jurisdiction, and PRC China and ROC China (Taiwan) are still trying to resolve their soverenty problems, and that gave the south east asian countries a chance to grab the islands while China and Taiwan are still in dispute.
DDauge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 10:51 AM   #11
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,124
Thanked 9,915 Times in 3,934 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDauge View Post
The reason that China has claim over that sea area further off its homeland is because there are these islands in the South China Sea that are historically Chinese islands. There has been Chinese jurisdiction over these islands for thousands of years. Similiar to the US which has claim on the sea area near Hawaii..which is much further off US homeland

the US has military base in Korea, Guam island, Hawaii and in Okinawa...
even in Germany and Saudi Arabia.

Thats way more further than the US homeland.
Sorry, flawed argument.

History is history. You're talking about something that occured thousands of years ago by a totally different gov't.

If you truly believe in their claim, then I guess UK can still claim 40% of Africa the other 40% for France..and most of South America is still under Spain.
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 10:53 AM   #12
Ubereem Mod
 
Gt-R R34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,070
Thanked 120 Times in 63 Posts
Failed 24 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
Sorry, flawed argument.

History is history. You're talking about something that occured thousands of years ago by a totally different gov't.

If you truly believe in their claim, then I guess UK can still claim 40% of Africa the other 40% for France..and most of South America is still under Spain.
pwned.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Culture_Vulture View Post
sometimes I like to use kindergarten art class scissors to cut my pubes
Gt-R R34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 12:21 PM   #13
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
DDauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: van
Posts: 131
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 13 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
Sorry, flawed argument.

History is history. You're talking about something that occured thousands of years ago by a totally different gov't.

If you truly believe in their claim, then I guess UK can still claim 40% of Africa the other 40% for France..and most of South America is still under Spain.

The difference is, China still control over half of those islands. And no point telling me this, I am just telling you why China is claiming these islands.
DDauge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 01:58 PM   #14
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
dna82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pew pew lazer
Posts: 663
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDauge View Post
The reason that China has claim over that sea area further off its homeland is because there are these islands in the South China Sea that are historically Chinese islands. There has been Chinese jurisdiction over these islands for thousands of years. Similiar to the US which has claim on the sea area near Hawaii..which is much further off US homeland

the US has military base in Korea, Guam island, Hawaii and in Okinawa...
even in Germany and Saudi Arabia.

Thats way more further than the US homeland.
and you know what the wierd thing is? South Korea, Guam, Hawaii, and Okinawa; are great fuckin places to live.

likewise, Tibet and North Korea are shit places.

Get the drift?
dna82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 02:09 PM   #15
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,679
Thanked 10,395 Times in 3,918 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
i was wondering what argument the chinalovers would make, i see most of them kept out of the thread but the ones that ventured in.. wow.. once ancient historical claim and comparing us military bases to ownership? lol

Last edited by StylinRed; 05-13-2009 at 02:16 PM.
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 02:21 PM   #16
They let me be a moderator. LOL
 
SpuGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,221
Thanked 3,674 Times in 869 Posts
Failed 1,062 Times in 190 Posts
You know, we could always fight over it.
Billions of people vs coalition of billions of people. Lets see who wins.

One on One? Fuck that 3 on one. No Duels.
SpuGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 02:39 PM   #17
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
fetched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 225 Times in 62 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 35 Posts
People don't bother reading before they reply.
Every other island on that map is also trying to get a much bigger boundary than the 200 mile line, only China is marked for what they want.
If you read the fine lines in the article, every country has their right to 200 miles of exclusive marine boundary. Look at where all the disputed islands are, if they are disputed, it could be every countries right to mark that country theirs and create a marine boundary around the disputed islands, that's exactly what China did
It also mentioned in the article that the bigger nations are able to extend their boundary because of their land mass.

By the way DNA, you should really be quiet. This isn't a place you belong. Reading your comments equals failure of any Asian related knowledge.
fetched is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 02:44 PM   #18
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
dna82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pew pew lazer
Posts: 663
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fetched View Post
People don't bother reading before they reply.
Every other island on that map is also trying to get a much bigger boundary than the 200 mile line, only China is marked for what they want.
If you read the fine lines in the article, every country has their right to 200 miles of exclusive marine boundary. Look at where all the disputed islands are, if they are disputed, it could be every countries right to mark that country theirs and create a marine boundary around the disputed islands, that's exactly what China did
It also mentioned in the article that the bigger nations are able to extend their boundary because of their land mass.

By the way DNA, you should really be quiet. This isn't a place you belong. Reading your comments equals failure of any Asian related knowledge.
oh, my reply wasn't to the article, it was about ddauge's comment, you should practice what you preach and read my replies carefully.

sorry fetched, we're not in communist china, i'm allowed to say what I want on the INNERNETS!!!11!
dna82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 02:46 PM   #19
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
fetched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 225 Times in 62 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 35 Posts
Of course i was reading what you said. I said that you have no Asian related knowledge because you referred Tibet as a shit place. Maybe, just maybe you should listen to someone that's actually been there and tell you it's not. Like me. It doesn't have nice hotels, it isn't developed, but the untouched habitat is a different kind of enjoyment than Hawaii per say

And yes, your free to make a fool out of yourself anytime you feel like.
fetched is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 02:54 PM   #20
My homepage has been set to RS
 
tool001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 2,217
Thanked 811 Times in 274 Posts
Failed 170 Times in 63 Posts
what Blinky said " Do I sense another Chinese thread "
tool001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 02:58 PM   #21
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
dna82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pew pew lazer
Posts: 663
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fetched View Post
Of course i was reading what you said. I said that you have no Asian related knowledge because you referred Tibet as a shit place. Maybe, just maybe you should listen to someone that's actually been there and tell you it's not. Like me. It doesn't have nice hotels, it isn't developed, but the untouched habitat is a different kind of enjoyment than Hawaii per say

And yes, your free to make a fool out of yourself anytime you feel like.
anyplace which doesn't guarantee your basic rights is a shit place, therefor, Tibet falls into the 'shit' category. Is it that difficult for you to see?

or does having nice scenery and a good hotel make for a wonderful country?

oh oh oh! here comes the 'work in progress' arguement!!!

comeback and talk to me when you've grown out of your ethnic pride phase.
dna82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 03:04 PM   #22
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
fetched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 225 Times in 62 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 35 Posts
The whole philosophy behind human rights. It is much bigger than you and I.
fetched is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 03:05 PM   #23
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
dna82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pew pew lazer
Posts: 663
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fetched View Post
The whole philosophy behind human rights. It is much bigger than you and I.
please give a more vague answer, it makes you look smarter!
dna82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 03:06 PM   #24
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
hk20000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,645
Thanked 1,357 Times in 508 Posts
Failed 229 Times in 105 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fetched View Post
People don't bother reading before they reply.
Every other island on that map is also trying to get a much bigger boundary than the 200 mile line, only China is marked for what they want.
If you read the fine lines in the article, every country has their right to 200 miles of exclusive marine boundary. Look at where all the disputed islands are, if they are disputed, it could be every countries right to mark that country theirs and create a marine boundary around the disputed islands, that's exactly what China did
It also mentioned in the article that the bigger nations are able to extend their boundary because of their land mass.

By the way DNA, you should really be quiet. This isn't a place you belong. Reading your comments equals failure of any Asian related knowledge.
yes but the China's current declaration is a lot more than the 200mile line which is the standard.... Those dotted islands look like they belong to Phillipines or Malaysia more than anything....
__________________
⇐ If I bothered replying, that's the face I made while I typed.

  • 2017 Alfa Romeo Giula Q4
  • 1999 Nissan Stagea 260RS 1 of 748
  • 1998 Nissan Laurel Medallion Club S drift boi
  • 1991 Lexus LS400 mint boi
  • 1989 Nissan S-Cargo cute boi
hk20000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 03:09 PM   #25
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
dna82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pew pew lazer
Posts: 663
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000 View Post
yes but the China's current declaration is a lot more than the 200mile line which is the standard.... Those dotted islands look like they belong to Phillipines or Malaysia more than anything....
nah, see those tiny tiny uninhabital islands in the center? they're saying their 200 nautical mile line is starting from them, not from the actual mainland.
dna82 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net