[ASG111]

remember the car keyer that was keying cars all over in coquitlam, east van, and aberdeen and writing shit all over?

well he had 42 out of 43 charges thrown out of court... what a fucking joke.

-----------------------------
Car keyer has most charges thrown out of court
Found guilty of one count of mischief
Evan Kelly VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) | Saturday, July 18th, 2009 2:34 pm
Bookmark

VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - A man with an alleged grudge against ICBC has been found guilty of one count of mischief. Soo Yo Kim avoided 42 other charges.

It stems from roughly 400 cars being keyed last year in various locations that stretched from Science World to Coquitlam. Police say they arrested the 31-year-old Kim after watching him key several cars in East Vancouver last April. The Coquitlam resident was named as the prime suspect at that point and has prior convictions for similar crimes.

However, a provincial court judge threw out 42 of 43 charges citing a lack of evidence and improper handling of the case. It's believed Kim had some sort of ongoing dispute with ICBC, but whether that was his motivation remains unclear.

[winson604]

Are you really surprised. Our system has always been a fucking joke. He'll get it one of these days.

[slammer111]

Next time someone's just going to pull a vigilante on him.

If u really don't like someone, go lift up their wipers or spit on their car. Both get the message across, and I'd much rather have that happen than to get keyed!

[StylinRed]

uhmm... from what i recall this guy was only caught keying like 1 or 2 cars... and they just blamed all the other incidents on him

[billboa]

he beat the system, good for him.

Im sure he will get his one day is he keeps it up.

[Gnomes]

I'm pretty sure the punishment for keying cars are more stiffer than murder in Canada.

[maxxxboost]

Karma!
Maybe someone will key his FACE!

[moomooCow]

uhmm... from what i recall this guy was only caught keying like 1 or 2 cars... and they just blamed all the other incidents on him

did you expect cops to watch him key a couple hundred more cars?... IIRC this guy was already the prime suspect before they watched him key a couple more.

[StylinRed]

what kind of question is that???? are u retarded??? you can't blame/ mark a guy guilty for everything based on witnessing a few acts


thats like charging a guy for all unsolved murders because he killed 1 person or better yet attempted to kill a person

[Marco911]

And funny enough the keying of cars stopped after they busted him.

[91LS-VTak]

Knowing that a guy is responsible for keying a bunch of cars is one thing. Being able to prove it in a court of law is a very different thing altogether.

[Vansterdam]

a straight fuck you to icbc right there

[you]

^^^hahahha good call

[tiger_handheld]

how does lifting the person's wipers get a point across?

educate me.

[ZhangFei]

well, we got his name. I wonder if "Soo Yo Kim" is actually a homophone of some sort.

someone look him up and see if he's on facebook bahahah

[GLOW]

maybe he'll key a range rover or escalade and get shot by the owner.

[BNR32_Coupe]

lol @ revscenes instant response: "what?? not guilty?! we have a messed up system!"

[PiuYi]

how did he get 43 charges laid against him?? he was only caught keying a few cars!!
being a prime suspect is as close to getting convicted as i am to getting laid tonight

[91LS-VTak]

well, we got his name. I wonder if "Soo Yo Kim" is actually a homophone of some sort.

someone look him up and see if he's on facebook bahahah

haha, i thought you meant 'homophobe' until i looked it up and discovered that homophone is actually a real word. I learned today!:teach:

[shenmecar]

haha, i thought you meant 'homophobe' until i looked it up and discovered that homophone is actually a real word. I learned today!:teach:

=_=

[gnat.]

a straight fuck you to icbc right there

LOL! agreed.

[Evolutionian]

i think if canadian government dont start actually charging these fuckers, one day some people will just take these shit into their own hands..

[Chopstick]

Knowing that a guy is responsible for keying a bunch of cars is one thing. Being able to prove it in a court of law is a very different thing altogether.

yupyup!

judge: "can you point to the offender?"

plaintiff: "mmmm....... rite... thur" ( o___-)-----> (O__O)!

lawyer: "OBJECTION"

judge: "OBJECTION NOT SUSTAINED"

judge: "did he hit you?

plaintiff: "mmhmm (o__x)....."

lawyer: "OBJECTION"

judge: "OBJECTION NOT FUCKING SUSTAINED, BITCH!"

plaintiff: "he smacked me"

defendant: "superman smacked you"

judge: "did you hit him?"

defendant: "nope"

plaintiff: "but.. my.. face.. and.. i was there when he punched me"

lawyer: "OBJECTION"

judge: "SUSTAINED"

lawyer: "your fucking honor, i would like to ask mr. plaintiff a few questions."

lawyer: *brings out a picture of superman's hand* "how large is his hand?"

plaintiff: "9 inches"

lawyer: "how large is your wound? remember, you're under fucking oath"

plaintiff: "9 inches"

lawyer: "which brings me to my next question: how come the wound and superman's hand is indeed the same size? and, how can your face be smashed, yet the defendant's hand isnt? i have with me today some kind of specialist with a phd in quantum physics at some stupid university. he has brought along a presentation that shows what happens when a fist hits a face, in high definition slow motion, in powerpoint format."

lawyer: "what is your expert opinion on this?"

specialist: "superman did it"

lawyer: "mr. plaintiff, can you prove that superman smacked you?

plaintiff: "no"

lawyer: "which means, you can't also prove that superman DIDNT smack you?"

plaintiff: "lolwut, no"

lawyer: "i also have a written testimonial for my client. it is from the client's mixed martial arts instructor. it says the following: mr. defendant is harmless. so much to the point of... cuddly-ness"

lawyer: "do you like little boys?"

plaintiff: "(O__o) wut kind of question is that"

lawyer: "ANSWER THE QUESTION"

judge: "ANSWER THE QUESTION"

lawyer: "you're saying that you never looked at a penis before, even your own?"

plaintiff: "well, there was this one time, i was in the change room, and i glanced a this kid's penis. i cant help it, his robe fell off and i was caught by surprise. i am not a little boy lover"

lawyer: "i quote you when you say "cant help it". how were you feeling back then that moment?"

plaintiff: "i was relaxed, i just finished swimming, that's why i went there in the first place"

lawyer: "you were i repeat "relaxed". ladies and gentlemen, recent studies done by some nobody shows that relaxation is a form of pleasure. so, in this case, plaintiff was feeling pleasurable"

lawyer: "so let me sum that up: "kid", "penis", "cant help it", "pleasurable""

lawyer: "with no further evidence and proof that my client did attack, and adding to the fact that we are dealing with a possible serial little boy molester, i ask the judge and jury to re evaluate this picture"

judge: *gets out the big book of bullshit*

judge: "i hereby drop the charge due to lack of evidence and improper handling. dont forget to pay on your way out, sucker"

[hotjoint]

wow shitty deal, another person gets off easy. Gotta love our system :thumbsup:

[bing]

what kind of question is that???? are u retarded??? you can't blame/ mark a guy guilty for everything based on witnessing a few acts


thats like charging a guy for all unsolved murders because he killed 1 person or better yet attempted to kill a person

The Coquitlam resident was named as the prime suspect at that point and has prior convictions for similar crimes.

As I recall, he was busted for keying many cars in the same fashion before so it was not a surprise he was a suspect.

[yellowpower]

yupyup!

judge: "can you point to the offender?"

plaintiff: "mmmm....... rite... thur" ( o___-)-----> (O__O)!

lawyer: "OBJECTION"

judge: "OBJECTION NOT SUSTAINED"

judge: "did he hit you?

plaintiff: "mmhmm (o__x)....."

lawyer: "OBJECTION"

judge: "OBJECTION NOT FUCKING SUSTAINED, BITCH!"

plaintiff: "he smacked me"

defendant: "superman smacked you"

judge: "did you hit him?"

defendant: "nope"

plaintiff: "but.. my.. face.. and.. i was there when he punched me"

lawyer: "OBJECTION"

judge: "SUSTAINED"

lawyer: "your fucking honor, i would like to ask mr. plaintiff a few questions."

lawyer: *brings out a picture of superman's hand* "how large is his hand?"

plaintiff: "9 inches"

lawyer: "how large is your wound? remember, you're under fucking oath"

plaintiff: "9 inches"

lawyer: "which brings me to my next question: how come the wound and superman's hand is indeed the same size? and, how can your face be smashed, yet the defendant's hand isnt? i have with me today some kind of specialist with a phd in quantum physics at some stupid university. he has brought along a presentation that shows what happens when a fist hits a face, in high definition slow motion, in powerpoint format."

lawyer: "what is your expert opinion on this?"

specialist: "superman did it"

lawyer: "mr. plaintiff, can you prove that superman smacked you?

plaintiff: "no"

lawyer: "which means, you can't also prove that superman DIDNT smack you?"

plaintiff: "lolwut, no"

lawyer: "i also have a written testimonial for my client. it is from the client's mixed martial arts instructor. it says the following: mr. defendant is harmless. so much to the point of... cuddly-ness"

lawyer: "do you like little boys?"

plaintiff: "(O__o) wut kind of question is that"

lawyer: "ANSWER THE QUESTION"

judge: "ANSWER THE QUESTION"

lawyer: "you're saying that you never looked at a penis before, even your own?"

plaintiff: "well, there was this one time, i was in the change room, and i glanced a this kid's penis. i cant help it, his robe fell off and i was caught by surprise. i am not a little boy lover"

lawyer: "i quote you when you say "cant help it". how were you feeling back then that moment?"

plaintiff: "i was relaxed, i just finished swimming, that's why i went there in the first place"

lawyer: "you were i repeat "relaxed". ladies and gentlemen, recent studies done by some nobody shows that relaxation is a form of pleasure. so, in this case, plaintiff was feeling pleasurable"

lawyer: "so let me sum that up: "kid", "penis", "cant help it", "pleasurable""

lawyer: "with no further evidence and proof that my client did attack, and adding to the fact that we are dealing with a possible serial little boy molester, i ask the judge and jury to re evaluate this picture"

judge: *gets out the big book of bullshit*

judge: "i hereby drop the charge due to lack of evidence and improper handling. dont forget to pay on your way out, sucker"



lolcat wutlol