Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |  |
01-08-2010, 12:49 AM
|
#1 | y'all better put some respeck on my name
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,724
Thanked 9,987 Times in 2,607 Posts
Failed 394 Times in 160 Posts
| 3D TVs are eye-popping, but they have their drawbacks
So when do we see the flying cars? 2020? Quote:
It's all about 3D at the Consumer Electronics Show this year, and believe me: there's no shortage of eye-popping, head-ducking 3D demos on the show floor. It's all quite impressive, but look a little harder and you start to see the flaws.
I've spent a good part of my time at CES running from one massive exhibitor booth to another, starting with Panasonic and moving on to such big names as Samsung, Sharp, Toshiba, and Sony.
I've tried on more 3D glasses than I care to count (they're all of the battery-powered "active-shutter" variety, by the way, complete with LCD lenses that rapidly open and shut in sync with the alternating left-and-right images on the HDTV screen), and overall, I'm happy to report that the effect is, indeed, very similar to what you'll see in a theater.
Yes, the 3D image does seem to stretch behind the screen, with moments that deliver a sublime sense of depth, such as, say, the ballroom floor during the "Alice in Wonderland" trailer or even the foreshortened spinning wheel in "Wheel of Fortune" (yes, someone bothered to shoot an episode in 3D, I kid you not). There were also plenty of "whoa!" sequences, like a CGI dude with a ball and paddle who repeatedly zinged the ball right up to my nose.
That said, I did notice a few key annoyances that could be a problem for anyone who buys one of these new sets for their living room. Glare
Granted, lighting conditions on the CES show floor aren't the best ... but the same goes for most living rooms, frankly, and I found the glare on glossy HDTV screens (particularly the plasma variety) to be very distracting, putting a serious dent in the 3D effect. Ideally, of course, you'll want to have your 3D HDTV in a completely darkened room (such as the makeshift theater where Panasonic was showing off its gargantuan, 152-inch 3D plasma set). Barring that, though, you'll at least want to make sure there aren't any glare-inducing light sources in the area. Flicker
The latest generation of 3D HDTVs and their accompanying active-shutter glasses are designed to have refresh rates so fast that you won't notice any flicker at all; nevertheless, there were still moments when I definitely did notice a slight but distracting flicker, particularly during brightly-lit scenes. The effect was worse on some sets than others (I won't call anyone out quite yet, given that it's so tough to judge on the CES show floor), and it's possible that proper calibration could reduce the problem. Still, it's worth noting. Weird-looking 3D
This next issue has more to do with the 3D sources on display here at CES than with the 3D sets themselves, but it could end up being an issue with the upcoming 3D TV networks and programming that are being touted this week. While the 3D trailers of "Avatar" that are prevalent at the show look amazingly realistic, some of the other demos -- of, say, skaters on an ice rink, underwater sea urchins, football players bashing heads, and so on -- look like the same, cheesy cardboard cut-outs that you might see in a kid's plastic ViewMaster. The problem, I'm guessing, is that those producing these odd-looking 3D clips are trying to exaggerate the 3D effect to get the most eye-pooping visuals, but the effect looks plain weird -- not anything like real life at all, but a strange, fake-looking and oddly flat 3D pseudo world. While accomplished filmmakers like James Cameron seem to be going out of their way to go for a more subtle, realistic 3D effect, my fear is that upcoming 3D programmers might be temped to go with the flashy, phony look instead. So-so looking 2D-to-3D conversion
Both Samsung and Toshiba are promising on-board 2D-to-3D conversion on their sets, and as you might expect ... the effect only looks fair, at best. I saw a demo clip showing airborne views of a forest, a soccer match, a gushing creek, and so on, and the visuals looked ... well, they had what I'd call "pseudo depth," conveying the sense that the image was stretching behind the screen but not of a real 3D landscape. It's not terrible by any stretch, but don't expect an on-the-fly 2D-to-3D conversion of "The Empire Strikes Back" or Anderson Cooper to look anything like the real 3D thing. Pricey 3D glasses
I touched on this issue in passing a couple of days ago but it's worth mentioning again: these "active-shutter" 3D glasses that come with all of the 3D TV sets I've seen today won't be cheap. No one is discussing pricing quite yet, but I've heard that these IR-enabled, battery-powered glasses could cost somewhere in the $100 range, and at best, you should only expect to get two pairs of glasses with your new 3D TV. (Sony has committed to two pairs of active-shutter glasses for its top-of-the-line 3D models, while Panasonic will only give you one; Samsung hasn't announced its policy yet.) So if you were having thoughts of a 3D Super Bowl party with, oh, a dozen friends or so, and let's say the glasses end up costing only $50 a pop ... well, that's a cool $600 worth of 3D glasses.
Again, it's really tough to get an accurate grip on the latest 3D TVs in just two hours in a jam-packed convention center, but I have to say ... my impressions are decidedly mixed. While this is definitely the year for selling 3D TVs, whether it's the year for buying one is an open question.
So, what do you think: Are you sold on 3D TV? On the fence? Keeping your distance (har har)? Fire away below.
| |
| |
01-08-2010, 01:09 AM
|
#2 | Banned (BBM)
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
|
damn 3D tv would be dope!!!!
it does get dizzy at times after viewing for a long period of time tho
|
| |
01-08-2010, 05:49 AM
|
#3 | ESKETIT
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Shambhala
Posts: 23,360
Thanked 9,694 Times in 2,326 Posts
Failed 997 Times in 240 Posts
|
cant wait for 3d porn
|
| |
01-08-2010, 05:53 AM
|
#4 | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Canada
Posts: 5,647
Thanked 1,816 Times in 450 Posts
Failed 4,294,967,295 Times in 173 Posts
|
thats pretty cool ! 3-D discovery channel would be fucking sweet
|
| |
01-08-2010, 07:24 AM
|
#5 | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
im confused.. i watched Caroline (great movie) at a buddys house a while back on blu-ray and we put 3d paper glasses on it came with.. it looked pretty good in 3d i must admit.. and this was on his DLP rear projection tv.
|
| |
01-08-2010, 10:43 AM
|
#6 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,124
Thanked 9,915 Times in 3,934 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
|
^ those are the effects that were created in the blu-ray source not the TV itself
and the glasses were the green/red hue ones not the ones that will dominate future 3d markets..
eventually they'll shift away from using glasses at all but until then do i dont see 3d going mainstream whatsoever
|
| |
01-08-2010, 02:05 PM
|
#7 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: ur sistrs pants
Posts: 2,656
Thanked 606 Times in 105 Posts
Failed 342 Times in 57 Posts
|
3d porn ftw
|
| |
01-08-2010, 03:42 PM
|
#8 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 5,138
Thanked 2,216 Times in 510 Posts
Failed 852 Times in 132 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Vansterdam cant wait for 3d porn | now i finally have a reason to live.
LOL jk.
|
| |
01-08-2010, 03:51 PM
|
#9 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 4,201
Thanked 3,509 Times in 1,329 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
|
Yeah until they make it so you don't have to wear those big goofy glasses I see this being a flop. 3D is cool once and awhile but I don't need it for everything I watch on tv Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
01-08-2010, 06:44 PM
|
#10 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,629
Thanked 273 Times in 90 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 32 Posts
|
Honestly, instead of making fake 3D stuff, all they really have to do is ONLY do sports/nature documentaries and people will start converting.
Imagine 3D NHL one day. The World Cup alone should be spurring some 3D sales this year.
Another thing the different brands should be gunning for is compatibility between different brands of those shutter glasses. Using that Super Bowl example, if everyone brought a pair from home (from their own set) and they all work on your TV, 2 sets per TV sale is plenty to be honest. The only people that suffer would be say a family of 4, but even then, the parents just have to cough up a bill or two to solve the problem.
4k would be nice, but not happening anytime soon. 1080p already provides more detail than most people can see, based on current TV and room sizes. And then all the studios have to upgrade their equipment yet again.
Last edited by slammer111; 01-08-2010 at 08:14 PM.
|
| |
01-08-2010, 06:48 PM
|
#11 | I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,679
Thanked 10,395 Times in 3,918 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by DC5-S im confused.. i watched Caroline (great movie) at a buddys house a while back on blu-ray and we put 3d paper glasses on it came with.. it looked pretty good in 3d i must admit.. and this was on his DLP rear projection tv. | they're moving to new 3D televisions and blu-rays
its the same type of 3D we get in movie theatres now, with the clear glasses
they're trying to find excuses to get people to upgrade their equipment
|
| |
01-08-2010, 07:57 PM
|
#12 | y'all better put some respeck on my name
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,724
Thanked 9,987 Times in 2,607 Posts
Failed 394 Times in 160 Posts
| |
| |
01-08-2010, 08:05 PM
|
#13 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,124
Thanked 9,915 Times in 3,934 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
|
looks like samsung's gonna kick sony's ass again this year in the flat-panel market
152" TV...i'm sure it'll be like $25k lol
|
| |
01-08-2010, 09:41 PM
|
#14 | Head of HR....have a seat on that couch
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 21,878
Thanked 15,606 Times in 4,325 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 130 Posts
|
"I can't wait to get porn on these"
LOL
__________________ feedback Originally posted by v.b. can we stop, my pussy hurts... Originally posted by asian_XL fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol Originally posted by Fei-Ji haha i can taste the cum in my mouth Originally posted by FastAnna when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad RSUV #7 |
| |
01-08-2010, 10:06 PM
|
#15 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2006 Location: 604
Posts: 2,081
Thanked 1,462 Times in 390 Posts
Failed 436 Times in 103 Posts
|
MW2 IN 3D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmeister who are you planning to spend the rest of your life with? your sister or girlfriend? | Quote:
Originally Posted by .Renn.Sport I sold my Yaris 5 years ago, and seriously, IT IS better than your shit box civics. The mods I have for that car is probably worth more than your whole self-worth. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Joreus After spending some time reading through this thread, I now know how to give a killer blowjob. Thanks revscene. |
2005 richmond transportation device
|
| |
01-09-2010, 12:16 PM
|
#16 | To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 17,085
Thanked 8,131 Times in 3,815 Posts
Failed 1,514 Times in 651 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero looks like samsung's gonna kick sony's ass again this year in the flat-panel market
152" TV...i'm sure it'll be like $25k lol | The 103 inch from panny goes for 50K US and 2 years ago it was over 100k I bet this one is over a 100k.
__________________ Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter. |
| |
01-09-2010, 12:50 PM
|
#17 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,963
Thanked 362 Times in 161 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 49 Posts
|
Shit, ppl need a mortgage to get one of these TVs!
__________________ 2011 VW Tiguan Highline 4Motion (Canada) 2013 Lexus IS350 F-Sport (Melbourne) |
| |
01-09-2010, 02:09 PM
|
#18 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Van.
Posts: 2,929
Thanked 1,967 Times in 290 Posts
Failed 536 Times in 92 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jah Gekko | wow this looks nuttssss
__________________
RIP JN
UNCE UNCE UNCE! Quote:
Originally Posted by strykn Comparing A&B with deadmau5? Really? I should fucking slap you | 2007 Acura TL 2005 Acura TL....RIP 2003 Honda Accord Coupe V6....RIP |
| |
01-10-2010, 04:00 AM
|
#19 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: van
Posts: 2,341
Thanked 871 Times in 141 Posts
Failed 274 Times in 41 Posts
|
omg preview remote
|
| |
01-10-2010, 08:34 AM
|
#20 | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Lower Mainland
Posts: 782
Thanked 90 Times in 38 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 5 Posts
|
I hate watching 3D movies, definately will not be buying into this 3D tv shit.
|
| |  |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:38 PM. |