View Full Version
:
no more spiderman 4, time for a reboot
Grandmaster TSE
01-11-2010, 02:53 PM
http://www.superherohype.com/news/spider-mannews.php?id=8976
could be a good thing for true comic lovers
Jsunu
01-11-2010, 03:04 PM
Thank god, no more weird EMO parker
spoon.ek9
01-11-2010, 03:05 PM
thank god, no more kirsten dunst as mary jane.
also, eric foreman =/= venom.
Idunno man... as mediocre as the third one was, I don't think you can re-do the 1st iteration of the series.
Crowtservo
01-11-2010, 06:59 PM
Too soon for any kind of "reboot". I think they should just drop it altogether. There are enough super hero movies coming out these days.
Gilgamesh
01-11-2010, 07:31 PM
2nd one worked imo. Third was awful....
Lomac
01-11-2010, 08:01 PM
Too soon for any kind of "reboot".
Exactly what I was thinking. Need to wait at least another five years before a reboot can be justified for anything other than an obvious cash grab.
yay no more kristen dunst
who do you guys want to see as mj?
i think rachel nichols would be good
Crowtservo
01-11-2010, 08:33 PM
They definitely jumped on the reboot boat pretty quick.
http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/01/11/spider-man-reboot-already-written-will-be-gritty-contemporary-take/
StylinRed
01-11-2010, 08:39 PM
yay no more kristen dunst
who do you guys want to see as mj?
i think rachel nichols would be good
if they're going to be in highschool she'd be too old
A reboot sounds alright if its anything like that cartoon Spectacular Spiderman?
cartoon is pretty dope
but they're going to need to have a different villain as the 1st enemy as its too close to re-do Green Goblin, Octopus, sandman,Venom
Maybe go the Gangster route (hmm like that cartoon) and have Electro, Hammerhead, Kingpin
Or The Lizard/Kraven etc
should be cool :)
wassup
01-11-2010, 10:13 PM
They should get a new cast and crew and make something different like ultimate spiderman or something. They have enough comics and different stories to make more movies.
my vote goes to Emma Stone as MJ!
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bHSVCs9rX0A/R1TCU-aTL9I/AAAAAAAACLo/YjSkh7GMAzk/s1600-R/eMMA+sTONE.jpg
ForbiddenX
01-11-2010, 10:36 PM
Great idea for a reboot. I'm a total spidey fan!
I have a feeling this reboot will have something to do with an Avengers movie or something like that. Look at all the other Marvel movies coming out too. Iron Man 2, Thor, Captain America, Spider-Man. It's got Avenger's written all over it!
Crowtservo
01-11-2010, 10:42 PM
Great idea for a reboot. I'm a total spidey fan!
I have a feeling this reboot will have something to do with an Avengers movie or something like that. Look at all the other Marvel movies coming out too. Iron Man 2, Thor, Captain America, Spider-Man. It's got Avenger's written all over it!
Don't forget The Hulk. They've already set him up to be in it at the end of the 2008 "The Incredible Hulk" with Edward Norton. Would be cool if they threw Spider Man in there too (even though he wasn't original in the Avengers... though I guess Captain America technically wasn't either)
SkinnyPupp
01-11-2010, 11:59 PM
Batman Begins changed everything, just like X-Men changed everything in 2000
StylinRed
01-12-2010, 12:49 AM
my vote goes to Emma Stone as MJ!
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bHSVCs9rX0A/R1TCU-aTL9I/AAAAAAAACLo/YjSkh7GMAzk/s1600-R/eMMA+sTONE.jpg
god i hope not..... MJ is supposed to be super model hot
but they should go the route that Stan Lee wanted (to have Gwen Stacy and MJ fight for Peters love and eventually Gwen wins out)
didn't the reboot for the Hulk come out just a few years in between?
I think its a fine idea.
Ronin
01-12-2010, 05:50 AM
Spider-man 3 was absolute shit.
Problem is...Spider-man isn't really a "serious" franchise so it can't really handle the tone of the new Batman movies if that's what you guys are thinking of in terms of reboot. I'm hoping they just don't make it shitty since the first two Spider-man films were fantastic and the third was just garbage.
Grandmaster TSE
01-12-2010, 10:45 AM
mary jane shouldn't be in the picture yet, they should start it off with gwen stacy
since its in high school, it'll be the whole geeky guy trying to awkwardly ask her out while fighting crime on the side.
i think they should start with the lizard or electro for the first one
then the second movie can be about parker with gwen stacy in a relationship with green goblin as the main nemesis, and of course end with the death
third movie is when MJ steps in
Jsunu
01-12-2010, 11:02 AM
Spider-man 3 was absolute shit.
Problem is...Spider-man isn't really a "serious" franchise so it can't really handle the tone of the new Batman movies if that's what you guys are thinking of in terms of reboot. I'm hoping they just don't make it shitty since the first two Spider-man films were fantastic and the third was just garbage.
What really got me was the fact that 3 was made by basically the same people from 1 & 2, i just wonder how they effed up so badly
What really got me was the fact that 3 was made by basically the same people from 1 & 2, i just wonder how they effed up so badly
the movie studio wanted a story about venom and raimi didn't. so venom was half assedly slipped in.
at least that's how i understood it.
RacePace
01-12-2010, 01:02 PM
I think the first two Spider-man movies were perfect so re-doing the origin story would be a huge risk toward failure
Mugen EvOlutioN
01-12-2010, 02:16 PM
thx god there isnt a spiderman 4
mary jane shouldn't be in the picture yet, they should start it off with gwen stacy
since its in high school, it'll be the whole geeky guy trying to awkwardly ask her out while fighting crime on the side.
i think they should start with the lizard or electro for the first one
then the second movie can be about parker with gwen stacy in a relationship with green goblin as the main nemesis, and of course end with the death
third movie is when MJ steps in
or the shocker! or... make all the marvel movies lead to the Civil War storyline. :D
Grandmaster TSE
01-12-2010, 03:39 PM
or the shocker! or... make all the marvel movies lead to the Civil War storyline. :D
the shocker wouldn't be bad, but he wouldn't make a really good main villian, secondary for sure
the shocker wouldn't be bad, but he wouldn't make a really good main villian, secondary for sure
That's true... Maybe Kingpin + Sinister 6? haha
spoon.ek9
01-12-2010, 06:58 PM
i just hope they correct the giant overlooking of the way spiderman shoots his web. it comes from a fucking canister, not straight out of his wrist! the guy is a fucking chemist for god's sake..
Tegra_Devil
01-12-2010, 07:24 PM
they should do for spiderman what was done for batman(dark knight)
josh t-1
01-12-2010, 08:19 PM
Spider Man Reboot?
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj257/josh-t1/Revscene/reboot.jpg
sounds good to me!
Grandmaster TSE
01-13-2010, 12:38 AM
That's true... Maybe Kingpin + Sinister 6? haha
too early for sinister 6
StylinRed
01-13-2010, 04:34 AM
i just hope they correct the giant overlooking of the way spiderman shoots his web. it comes from a fucking canister, not straight out of his wrist! the guy is a fucking chemist for god's sake..
the webs are going to come out of his ass in the reboot, to make him more like a spider :haha:
jlo mein
01-13-2010, 05:36 AM
the webs are going to come out of his ass in the reboot, to make him more like a spider :haha:
LOL...in this case gritty realism FTL...
Grandmaster TSE
01-13-2010, 01:26 PM
matthew vaughn wants to direct the rebooted spider-man
pretty good choice if they want grittiness in the movie
6793026
01-13-2010, 02:02 PM
i never quit got what reboot was all about, my brother loved it.
raygunpk
01-13-2010, 02:51 PM
they need to make civil war. it would confuse the shit outta everyone but hardcore fans but it'd be so cool.
for the reboot, i'm hoping they won't show his origins, or just show a brief few minutes of it. by now, everyone should know how spiderman got his powers.
Grandmaster TSE
01-13-2010, 03:15 PM
they need to make civil war. it would confuse the shit outta everyone but hardcore fans but it'd be so cool.
for the reboot, i'm hoping they won't show his origins, or just show a brief few minutes of it. by now, everyone should know how spiderman got his powers.
quick flash backs would be nice, like what they did with the hulk
Neoxphuse
01-15-2010, 01:08 PM
The only way that I will watch this, Rachel McAdams as Mary Jane.
spoon.ek9
01-15-2010, 06:22 PM
the webs are going to come out of his ass in the reboot, to make him more like a spider :haha:
hahaha speechless.... :p
Bouncing Bettys
01-16-2010, 05:57 AM
bryce dallas howard who played Gwen Staci should have been Mary Jane all along
StylinRed
02-01-2010, 03:59 PM
http://www.ok.co.uk/celebnews/view/18263/Zac-Efron-to-be-the-next-Spiderman-/
Zac Efron = the New Spiderman..... getting paid $15million+ CAD
HIGH School Musical heartthrob Zac Efron is set for a £9million pay day as he takes on the role of SpiderMan.
Zac Efron will replace Tobey Maguire in the fourth blockbuster movie, due to start shooting later this year and scheduled to hit cinemas in 2012.
Tobey, 34, stunned bosses at Universal Pictures last year when he announced he was quitting the megabucks franchise.
But a studio insider revealed: “After dumping Spidey, Tobey then came to the rescue by recommending that Zac should take over his role.”
Producers believe the 22-year-old, who has a huge teen following, will bring new fans to the Spider-Man series by playing the reluctant hero and his alter ego Peter Parker.
They are also believed to be considering reuniting Zac with his High School Musical co-star Vanessa Hudgens, 21.
She is hotly tipped to replace Kirsten Dunst, 27, as Spider-Man’s love interest and the source added: “It would be a great coup to land her as well.
“The franchise would be revitalised and transformed by two of Hollywood’s most gifted and fast-rising young stars.”
U know id rather see Shia Labeouf take the role since he's in everything anyway, and he's the same age.... he's already got the curly hair down
im kinda hoping for tobey maguire again
raygunpk
02-01-2010, 04:04 PM
zac efron what the fuck
what the fuck
the fuck
fuck
sexyflanders
02-01-2010, 05:45 PM
zac efron what the fuck
what the fuck
the fuck
fuck
+1
DO NOT WANT
Grandmaster TSE
02-01-2010, 06:06 PM
maguire is too old now to do it
they want to do more of the ultimate series, so they need someone young
i really don't want it to be efron, but i can see that efron will bring girls to watch spiderman, haha
StylinRed
02-01-2010, 06:14 PM
But what about Vanessa Hudgens as Mary Jane? oO wtf
unless they have her play someone else which would be fine
Grandmaster TSE
02-01-2010, 06:24 PM
But what about Vanessa Hudgens as Mary Jane? oO wtf
unless they have her play someone else which would be fine
have her play gwen stacy and then kill her off
raygunpk
02-01-2010, 06:36 PM
i'm a huge spidey fan so i'll watch no matter what. even the abysmal spiderman 3 i saw a few times.
if efron/hudgens do get casted, it will seem like a moneygrab more than anything, which is disappointing.
twitchyzero
02-03-2010, 12:26 AM
The only way that I will watch this, Rachel McAdams as Mary Jane.
this
StylinRed
02-15-2011, 07:06 PM
This hasn't been updated in a year!
http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/2333/mv5bmtkyoda2mzgwml5bml5.jpg
http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/2030/mv5bmtm3mza1ndizml5bml5.jpg
so obviously zac efron and vanessa hudgens aren't casted
The guy who played the Facebook co-founder is spiderman (Andrew Garfield)
Emma Stone is Gwen Stacy (probably could have been Mary Jane but she isn't in this movie)
http://i607.photobucket.com/albums/tt151/fearlessbol/emma-stone-debuts-new-blonde-do-04-1.jpg
Rhys Ifans is playing Dr. Connors (The Lizard)
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/images/users/uploads/20732/Rhys-Ifans_lizard.JPG
Irfan Khan is playing Proto-Goblin
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/images/uploads/Irrfan_Khan-Proto_Goblin.jpg
Supposedly Phillip Seymour Hoffman is going to be Venom (rumor he's listed on imdb as such)
Fuck yeah, Emma Stone! But I really wanted her cast as Mary Jane :/ (see 1st page). Great to see the updated cast list.
epic suit. The hands look like spider man 2099
DanHibiki
02-16-2011, 01:53 AM
Wonder why his eyes have an orange-reddish tiny.
LOVE the web shooters
2 n r
02-16-2011, 05:57 AM
Supposedly Phillip Seymour Hoffman is going to be Venom (rumor he's listed on imdb as such)
that, i really doubt
but having venom again (done correctly this time) would be dope
my choice for MJ has to be Isla Fisher =]
SkinnyPupp
02-16-2011, 08:11 AM
that, i really doubt
but having venom again (done correctly this time) would be dope
I can't imagine an actor doing a better job than PSH. Man that makes me stoked for this if it's true!
SpuGen
02-16-2011, 08:16 AM
I can't imagine an actor doing a better job than PSH. Man that makes me stoked for this if it's true!
All Nighter '09: Philip Seymour Hoffman - CollegeHumor video
Tegra_Devil
02-16-2011, 08:45 AM
i could see it....
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQHNEGanedUrv-v810Vp5rC-sSnnCM4CNad_Bb313JBObK_2MHo
RacePace
02-16-2011, 11:17 AM
looks like no more webs shooting out of the skin
MrGoodbar
02-16-2011, 01:41 PM
http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/20090422/300.whowantstobemillionaire.philbin.regis.lc.04220 9.jpg
Regis for uncle ben. Final answer: fuck yah
wingies
02-16-2011, 04:32 PM
^^hahhahaha
SkinnyPupp
02-16-2011, 08:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkeLGisUHtc
Majestic12
02-17-2011, 08:47 PM
The costume actually looks like fabric this time around.
The old costume looked like scales and the CGI was VERY obvious at times. Hope this turns out well!
Could've used a hotter Gwen Stacey though.
jonwon
07-19-2011, 03:29 PM
trailer leaked and imo it doesnt look that good. looks like they're trying to follow the batman formula and make it more of a serious movie rather than comic book fun. but the POV scene looked pretty cool though
‪The Amazing Spider-Man 2012 Trailer‬‏ - YouTube
Matlock
07-19-2011, 03:36 PM
FPS?
Doom?
If this is in 3d, I can imagine my gf getting sick.
DanHibiki
07-19-2011, 03:49 PM
not sure if it's the eyes but this pic looks weird. i think it's just the shape of his face
http://moviesmedia.ign.com/movies/image/article/118/1182115/the-amazing-spider-man-20110714001653766_640w.jpeg
DanHibiki
07-19-2011, 03:50 PM
FPS?
Doom?
If this is in 3d, I can imagine my gf getting sick.
I'm assuming the POV part was only for trailer purposes?
DanHibiki
07-19-2011, 04:01 PM
this is a good read
Hero Worship: Why the Spider-Man Reboot Will be Amazing
Peter Parker goes back to basics.
The word "reboot" is tossed around a lot these days. Usually, the connotation is negative. I admit that I often cringe when I hear something is being rebooted, particularly when the current iteration of the franchise is only a few years old. While reboots used to be primarily limited to franchises that didn't meet financial expectations or were received poorly, we're now hearing rumblings of even the biggest success stories – like Nolan's Batman movies – headed toward a reboot.
As fans of comics, games, movies and television, we've come to accept the process as a part of the life cycle for modern entertainment. Just think of reboots as a creative team change up on your favorite comic book. It's the same story interpreted in a new way. As we move forward into an age where continuity is less acceptable in the bid to gain more viewers (or readers), love it or hate it, this is something we have to learn to live with as fanboys and girls. This is the train of thought that gave birth to my excitement for The Amazing Spider-Man.
Sam Raimi's Spider-Man set the benchmark for superhero adaptations. If Bryan Singer's first X-Men unlocked the door, Spider-Man kicked it right the hell down. Followed up by Spider-Man 2 and the less popular but still financially successful Spider-Man 3, Raimi established the web slinger as a box office sure thing. But the original Spider-Man movie had the benefit of being in that first wave of modern superhero blockbusters, with each sequel built outwards from there. Since then, most of Marvel's movies – whether at Marvel Studios or someplace else – have more or less followed the same template. So here we are. Raimi and his cast are gone and an all-new crew is on board for a complete overhaul. But just as fans were wary of the original Spidey movies when news and photos started pouring in, so too is the case with Amazing Spider-Man. I can't tell you how many times I've seen comments that call out the Spider-Man costume for looking like a basketball.
Fanboys have this amazing ability to never be held accountable for their changing opinions. That's not an accusation; it's happened to me too. We tend to have a gut reaction to any bit of news, positive or negative, only to go back on our words later down the line. We might never speak about it (you know who you are), but we've all retroactively loved or hated things, despite the comments we left on forums forever ago. Such is the case with Raimi and Spider-Man, and I'm willing to bet even Nolan's Batman films will suffer the same fate. So with the memories of Raimi's Spider-Man waning, where does that leave the reboot?
The obvious details are in the back-to-basics approach. In terms of scope, everything is scaled back. To some degree, the mandate of a reboot demands as much. Amazing Spider-Man seems to suggest an origin, one villain, and one love interest. By that logic, we're back to that original Spider-Man template I mentioned earlier. But here's the thing: The Amazing Spider-Man is shaping up to be everything that Raimi's Spider-Man wasn't.
As much as I like Tobey Maguire, his Peter Parker was flat. He was a geek, but not a geek I wanted to root for. I liked him because I knew he was supposed to be Peter Parker, but I never really connected with him. Andrew Garfield (Doctor Who street cred aside) is an actor that I can buy in both roles – as Peter Parker and as Spider-Man – when Maguire never sold me in either.
Garfield, combined with director Marc Webb, screenwriter Steve Kloves (Harry Potter), and the lack of a J. Jonah Jameson character gives the impression that The Amazing Spider-Man will have a renewed focus on two things; high school and humor. Both of these are huge contributions to the success of Brian Michael Bendis' Ultimate Spider-Man, which rejuvenated the character in the comics even before the first Spider-Man movie came out. Half of the reason that I found such a disconnect with Raimi's Peter Parker could very well be because of his mere 30 minutes spent in high school before he moved onto living in the big city, rejecting Norman Osborn's money.
More importantly, we've seen Kloves' knack for adapting J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series to the screen with its humor intact amongst the more dramatic story beats. There's no reason to think that the same won't be true for Spider-Man. The other half of why I couldn't connect with Raimi's Parker is that he just wasn't fun. He offered a few lame quips on occasion, but they fell flat. Raimi's films were more focused on the dramatic trifecta of Peter, Harry, and Mary Jane. That's well and good, but it was at the expense of good ol' web slinging fun. Hopefully Kloves, with the addition of Webb in the director's chair and Garfield's natural charm, can offer up the kind of experience that Raimi's movies never could.
We've got to move beyond the notion of a reboot as being a bad thing. Regardless of the generational positives – there are 12 year-old fans that likely didn't see Raimi's Spider-Man in theaters – reboots serve to refocus the passion we have for our favorite characters and properties. Would you rather see a disinterested filmmaker tackle a fourth installment just to make a quick buck, or a whole new group of talented folk who want to make the best movie they can? Reboots are the way of the future, and it's time to get on board.
Hero Worship: Why the Spider-Man Reboot Will be Amazing - Comics Feature at IGN (http://comics.ign.com/articles/118/1182296p1.html)
jonwon
07-20-2011, 03:39 PM
HD version much better
‪The Amazing Spiderman - Trailer 1 (HD)‬‏ - YouTube
SkinnyPupp
07-20-2011, 08:21 PM
Oh man that has me so stoked! Except the first-person part. It looks like a goofy 3D thrill ride
Stormspirit
08-08-2011, 07:11 PM
looked like first person shooting game like battiefield 2 lols
RRxtar
08-08-2011, 08:43 PM
the first person thing would be fuckin sick and such a good idea and nice change but only if it was real not cgi, which would be so hard to do... we've all seen spiderman swingin from webs from buildings, but seeing it from his perspective could really give you a feel for what its like.
i dont know how many times i can keep watching a spiderman1 tho. it has to be the best known superhero story out there.
seakrait
08-08-2011, 08:53 PM
I'm hoping for Dr. Connor/The Lizard to be the villain this time. I'm thinking that could be that older dirty blonde-haired guy in the lab coat? Unless I missed someone mentioning who the villain was going to be this time around.
Hummus
08-11-2011, 07:17 PM
thank god, no more kirsten dunst as mary jane.
also, eric foreman =/= venom.
hahaha amen to that. kirsten was terrible! mj is supposed to be gorgeous dammit! lol
Culverin
08-12-2011, 12:43 AM
Oh man that has me so stoked! Except the first-person part. It looks like a goofy 3D thrill ride
You mean this part?
Amazing Spider-Man trailer replicated in Mirror's Edge - YouTube
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.