You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Photography LabTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...
lol that really is some pathetic equipment used for a paid wedding photo shoot
damn that defendant was really ugly and what a bitchy attitude I'd love to punch her in the face >.<
EDIT:
Lol I'm not a wedding photographer but i'd imagine the 70-300 on the Xti wouldn't be very useful no?
LOL
"these aren't gonna be the sharpest in the world if they are enlarged"
"those are enlarged!"
lmfao...
and there are no pics of the inside of the church >.<
it looks like the bitch has some food stuck between her teeth and is trying to get it out the whole time
LOL watched it a few times
the pro photogs got showed up by a black man in a robe... OWNED!
__________________
Sometimes we tend to be in despair when the person we love leaves us, but the truth is, it's not our loss, but theirs, for they left the only person who couldn't give up on them.
Make the effort and take the risk..
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't." - Eleanor Roosevelt
bitch deserved it. her stubborness and unprofessionalism is an embarrasement to photographers. Then again, what would you expect when you pay $1300 for a wedding photographer.
Judge Joe Brown is awesome...and a Canon shooter too! I hope that the defendant does advertise themselves anymore. Good on the newlyweds to go after them.
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Surrey
Posts: 989
Thanked 28 Times in 19 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 3 Posts
funny video indeed. I feel sorry for the 100's of weddings they supposedly done in the past. The one youtube comment that mentioned the details on the photos really explained a lot of things as to why the photos looked so bad.
__________________
CoLoRs Member #26
For Good or For Awesome?
There's nothing wrong with an XTi, as long as you use the appropriate lenses, which that particular 'photographer' didn't use. I know of a few photographers who have them as back-ups. You'd be surprised how many photographers use Walmart or Costco for prints. The average person wouldn't know the difference between Fuji Crystal Archive paper and Fuji Professional Crystal Archive paper anyway. There are two sides to this story, and the Judge did not hear the defendant out, or let her at least try and defend herself. In the end it was her attitude - one that in a real court would have her sitting in jail for contempt of court.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Yeah, I think XTi is fine. The photog who took my friend's wedding had it as a 3rd backup camera.
But besides the poor choice of lenses, the photographer in question clearly had no idea about some basic photography knowledge. You could tell by when judge Joe asked her what speed was the 70-300 and she had no idea.
She probably thought, hey, I bought a DSLR, I'm a photographer, let's go out and do some busineeessseeeee
That being said, the couple probably should have done a little research. Many pro wedding photographer list their equipment in their resume, when you see only 2 lenses and 1 body, you should know this is not what a real pro will do.
That being said, the couple probably should have done a little research. Many pro wedding photographer list their equipment in their resume, when you see only 2 lenses and 1 body, you should know this is not what a real pro will do.
I dont think so. The average person has no idea what zoom ranges or f-stop speed mean at all. To them, an XTi with an 18-55 and a 70-300 might be the same as a 1Dmk3 with a 24-70 f2.8L and a 70-200L. To them, it's just numbers! They just know that photo equipment is expensive and to them, the more you spend, the better the pictures lol
__________________ Your friendly neighbourhood realtor! :)
I dont think so. The average person has no idea what zoom ranges or f-stop speed mean at all. To them, an XTi with an 18-55 and a 70-300 might be the same as a 1Dmk3 with a 24-70 f2.8L and a 70-200L. To them, it's just numbers! They just know that photo equipment is expensive and to them, the more you spend, the better the pictures lol
Yes, but I'd expect a pro photog to own a lot of equipments.
I'm not sure about other photog, but the one my friend used (he's fairly famous in LM, won't mention name here for privacy of my frd) his equipment list is almost a page long. And that doesn't include small stuff like stand/flash.. etc. Just camera and lenses.
In their contract, he even listed out the equipments and amount of assistant+car that he would be bringing so the couple can prepare the appropriate parking space and some other small details. But then I think it got something to do with their pricing/insurance policy, because this particular photog can also shoot in MF, but pricing is different. So he maybe listed it to avoid any future problem.
That being said, the couple probably should have done a little research. Many pro wedding photographer list their equipment in their resume, when you see only 2 lenses and 1 body, you should know this is not what a real pro will do.
people that know nothing of photography won't know this. most people (myself included) don't know the differences between certain cameras, and you can only shoot one at a time so...
__________________ 1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
Definitely not the best lenses for the job, but you get what you paid for. The problem is misrepresentation. At what point do you label yourself as a professional? When you own top of the line equiptments? Or when your day job is photography? These people look like they are nothing more than photography enthusists.
You know now that I watched this video for the 10th time, come to think of it I bet a lot of us here with a good point and shoot could've taken similar quality pictures if not better than the ones these "professionals" took
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
![[HuCk DuCk]'s Avatar](images/avatars/Looney_Tunes_-_Tweety.gif)
