REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2010, 08:05 PM   #1
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
moky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
infrared photography

I asked some members here some questions I had recently over some shots I took and they suggested to post it on here.

About a few months ago, i posted an IR pic on the daily showcase and Mananetwork asked me why there was a gradient on one of the photos, like this one?


I went out the other day and since it was sunny, decided to do some IR shots. That darker shade seems to occur only during portrait shots (sometimes), and not landscape shots.







But then again, sometimes it doesn't occur on portait too.



Anyone have answers or ideas why this occurs? I'm somewhat clueless and the only hypothesis I have is that it depends on where the light source is and time of day. I doubt it's the camera (5d2), the lens (first pic posted was with a 24-105, everything else 24-70) or the filter (B+W)...
Advertisement
moky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 08:38 PM   #2
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Oh, shit! I totally forgot to answer you! Sorry...

This is most likely caused by the inside of the mirrorbox in the camera. Somehow, under the right conditions, it looks as if some light or infrared light is bouncing off the top of the mirrorbox and causes the exposure discrepancy. It very well may be that the mirror isn't closing all the way in some cases, which is causing a 'lip' inside, leading to a shadow going across the top of the sensor. Maybe there's something loose that is also causing it? Remember, the image is inverted on the sensor, so anything affecting the top of the sensor will manifest itself on the bottom of the image on screen.

Does this happen only with IR shots, or with long exposures?
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 09:09 PM   #3
Trollollolloing RS sine 2005
 
TOPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 7,093
Thanked 2,471 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 473 Times in 132 Posts
just curious, im guess u modified the camera sensor to take out the IR filter?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
I had some girl come into the busser station the other day trying to make out with every staff member and then pull down her pants and asked for someone to stick a dick in her (at least she shaved).
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic View Post
Vtec doesn't kick in on Reverse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma View Post
its like.. oh yeah oh yeah.. ohhhh yeah... OOoooOohh... why's it suddenly feel a bit better... ohhhh yeahh... ohhh...oh..fuck... it probably ripped.
TOPEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 09:10 PM   #4
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
No, he's using a B+W 093 IR filter.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 09:33 PM   #5
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
moky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
no worries senna!
thanks senna, the light bouncing off the mirrorbox is what i was thinking since there's no loose part around that area and it only happens during IR photos, never on long exposures.

rx_renesis: yeah senna's right, i'm using a B+W filter
moky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 09:58 PM   #6
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
No problemo.

Are you a CPS member? Canon will send you a replacement body within 24 hours and you can use that body while they look at your 5DmkII.

...or you can try mine. I can also bring a 5DmkII body from the rental department to see if the problem is inherent to the 5DmkII.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 10:11 PM   #7
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
moky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
Sadly no i don't qualify as CPS
Sure that would be great! When can i bring in the 5d2?

I just thought of something else too. Is it also because when I calibrate the white balance to custom by using a shot of sky or grass with the IR Filter on, that it messes with the resulting captures? It shouldn't, right?

Have you experienced this before Senna?
moky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 10:18 PM   #8
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
moky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
for reference, here's a long exposure shot, portrait and cropped, showing that the gradient is only observed during IR photos.
moky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2010, 10:28 PM   #9
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by moky View Post
Sadly no i don't qualify as CPS
Sure that would be great! When can i bring in the 5d2?

I just thought of something else too. Is it also because when I calibrate the white balance to custom by using a shot of sky or grass with the IR Filter on, that it messes with the resulting captures? It shouldn't, right?

Have you experienced this before Senna?
I would have to meet you outside of work...somewhere with lots of IR reflecting foliage.

No clue, but it shouldn't affect anything.

Nope, but then again, I only have a Hoya R72. I've never tried a B+W 093.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 08:30 AM   #10
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
moky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
sweet! I'll get in touch with you once the sun starts coming back out and we can review this IR fiasco. It's not really bothering me as to if my camera or something is loose. It's just bugging me because I can't figure out why it only happens when the shot is portrait.

Yeah I realized that I should have ordered the B+W 092 instead of the 093! the 092 apparently is the equivalent of the Hoya R72. Something about the 093 having a different wavelength for IR
moky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 11:52 AM   #11
Trollollolloing RS sine 2005
 
TOPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 7,093
Thanked 2,471 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 473 Times in 132 Posts
how much do those IR filters costs? and where can i can get one for 67mm??

*look over at senna's direction.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
I had some girl come into the busser station the other day trying to make out with every staff member and then pull down her pants and asked for someone to stick a dick in her (at least she shaved).
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic View Post
Vtec doesn't kick in on Reverse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma View Post
its like.. oh yeah oh yeah.. ohhhh yeah... OOoooOohh... why's it suddenly feel a bit better... ohhhh yeahh... ohhh...oh..fuck... it probably ripped.
TOPEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 12:24 PM   #12
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
moky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
it depends on what kind you get, and filter size.
67mm shouldn't be too expensive. the b+w 093 in 77mm is like 250 or 300 last time i checked. i know the hoya r72 77mm IR costs about 300-350?

b+w has two kinds, 093 and 092. the 092 is the same as the hoya R72 in terms of Ir wavelength. for a 67mm, id wager the price would be something like 150ish? MAYBE? Senna?

there are cheaper IR filters out there like kenko and marumi, but i don't have first hand experience on those so i can't vouch for them. If you have a cokin filter system (or lee, or singh-ray) i know cokin makes them too at a fraction of the cost, but you would need some sort of modular hood to block all light from coming in from the side.
moky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 12:48 PM   #13
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
keitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
some food for thought! I just read this in my latest "Popular Photography Magazine"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popular Photography, April 2010
Happy Birthday, infrared photography! One hundred years ago, Robert Williams Wood published the first infrared images in the "Journal of the Royal Photographic Society".
Happy Birthday IR Photography! Back then, they would have never had dreamed of what IR photography has become now, and how it helps society. e.g. weather satellites
keitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net