REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-17-2010, 01:51 AM   #1
HELP ME PLS!!!
 
BeefCake4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: B.C.
Posts: 5,855
Thanked 456 Times in 173 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
The D-Drive Infinitely Variable Geared Transmission


Do you think this technology can be apply to production vehicles in 10-15 years?
Advertisement
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Ulic Qel-Droma
ill have to agree. .. kinda. sometimes i get a hardon over her, but then i'm like *no i shouldnt.. this is wrong, she's not up to my standards*. but i guess my dick has it's own set of rules.
BeefCake4000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 03:11 AM   #2
Banned (ABWS)
 
orange7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MacLeod
Posts: 7,298
Thanked 542 Times in 289 Posts
Failed 1,639 Times in 418 Posts
he's gonna be baller
orange7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:27 AM   #3
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Conceptually it looks great..
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 05:58 AM   #4
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 584
Thanked 194 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 164 Times in 42 Posts
I see one big problem which he is being vague about in the video.

You have to put some power into the "control" shaft that varies the ratio. Where is this power going to come from? In the video he uses an electric motor, but in a car with 100+ HP what will drive this?

Although he did say the amount of energy used to control the second shaft is quite a bit lower than the amount of energy at the input shaft, he's being careful not to say how much.

Common sense will tell you that since the shafts are linked through planetary gears, there will be a limit as to what the difference between input power and control power will be.

For example, accelerating a small car using 50 HP might take 5 HP to operate the control shaft. So you need to apply a total of 55 HP to the transmission to get 50 HP out the rear (this doesn't take into account the normal losses any gear set will always have).

So I don't see how he can say it will be an "order of magnitude" more efficient than normal variable speed transmissions.
ericthehalfbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 07:12 AM   #5
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
immorality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: PoCo
Posts: 811
Thanked 1,245 Times in 203 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
Not exactly so revolutionary since I have a project at work using a similar principle of planetary and internal gears.
immorality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 07:42 AM   #6
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
interesting technology
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 09:44 AM   #7
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericthehalfbee View Post
I see one big problem which he is being vague about in the video.

You have to put some power into the "control" shaft that varies the ratio. Where is this power going to come from? In the video he uses an electric motor, but in a car with 100+ HP what will drive this?

Although he did say the amount of energy used to control the second shaft is quite a bit lower than the amount of energy at the input shaft, he's being careful not to say how much.

Common sense will tell you that since the shafts are linked through planetary gears, there will be a limit as to what the difference between input power and control power will be.

For example, accelerating a small car using 50 HP might take 5 HP to operate the control shaft. So you need to apply a total of 55 HP to the transmission to get 50 HP out the rear (this doesn't take into account the normal losses any gear set will always have).

So I don't see how he can say it will be an "order of magnitude" more efficient than normal variable speed transmissions.
If you look at a Prius, there are electric motors which can drive the entire car. He's being vague because this is still a proof of concept phase. A separate electric motor hooked up with a KERS system to drive the control shaft? Not an idea that's out to lunch.

Any smart person would be incredibly vague with details at this development point.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 10:13 AM   #8
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,737
Thanked 5,277 Times in 1,945 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
I don't see what the big deal is, the end result (infinite gear ratios) is the same as current CVT transmissions.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 10:13 AM   #9
My homepage has been set to RS
 
EmOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: van
Posts: 2,341
Thanked 871 Times in 141 Posts
Failed 274 Times in 41 Posts
hes a plumber!!

inspiration!
EmOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 12:33 PM   #10
I am on the internets
 
maxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,991
Thanked 184 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 31 Posts
i need so see fluffy kittens on the left of the screen....
__________________
"As Sir Francis Bacon once said, 'There is no beauty which hath not some strangeness about its proportions'.
And he's right, who ever he is. I mean, look at Keira Knightley.
She's just an ironing board with a face. And she works." - JC on the Alfa 8C
maxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 02:43 AM   #11
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
slammer111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,629
Thanked 273 Times in 90 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 32 Posts
Definitely a very neat concept which obviously works.

I can see another problem though. Say you needed to jumpstart a car that had this tranny. Where is your car going to get the power to keep the 2nd shaft spinning (ie Neutral)?

If I were to design something like this, I'd try to attach the motor (ie constant RPM input) to the planetary gear assembly instead. That way if you needed N, no electrical power would be needed. Instead, the planets and ring would just freewheel.

Definitely cool-looking doohickey though. For the guy's sake I'd sure hope he filed an assload of patents already. Why is he showing this on Youtube?? Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if a bunch of people in the automotive industry have already developed something similar but failed to put it in production because of performance or cost issues.

Last edited by slammer111; 05-18-2010 at 12:06 PM.
slammer111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 05:53 AM   #12
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 584
Thanked 194 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 164 Times in 42 Posts
^ I'd bet this has already been patented. Engineers have been working with planetary gearsets forever and I doubt that he's actually come up with a different way to use them.

I remember studying them back in 4th year automotive and one of the things we discussed was how changing the relative speeds of either the sun, planet or ring (annulus) would give you infinite ratios.

So as immortality said, there's nothing really new or revolutionary going on here.
ericthehalfbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 10:06 PM   #13
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
DasHooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 153
Thanked 19 Times in 13 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
This tranny would absolutely suck for racing. The other motor required would be running hardest to produce reverse, and pretty hard to produce dead stop and low gear. Take the total HP and cost of the motors and apply it with a friction clutch and you will be way ahead.

I was arguing this point and others pointed out it might make sense for boats cruising along. Top gear is the only one that doesn't require more energy than usual (assuming you can lock the shaft). The only advantage is that you can apply massive torque in the top gear which would be handy in a big boat.

Stationary applications I'm writing off because electric motors are better suited and generally don't use wide ranging transmissions.

Also, I've got a grudge against planetary gears after needing several 4L80E trannies rebuilt due to failure.
DasHooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 12:02 AM   #14
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
tonyvu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Van.
Posts: 2,929
Thanked 1,967 Times in 290 Posts
Failed 536 Times in 92 Posts
would love to see a working prototype
__________________
RIP JN

UNCE UNCE UNCE!

Quote:
Originally Posted by strykn View Post
Comparing A&B with deadmau5? Really? I should fucking slap you

2007 Acura TL
2005 Acura TL....RIP
2003 Honda Accord Coupe V6....RIP
tonyvu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net