REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-09-2010, 01:43 AM   #1
Cool beans bro
 
JordanLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,795
Thanked 1,054 Times in 231 Posts
Failed 34 Times in 21 Posts
Just bought a 7D. Which primes to buy for movie making?

Hey everyone, just decided to go with a 7D and wondered what lenses work best for filmmaking? I currently have a Canon 50 1.4 and I love it to death at the moment but when I start getting into making movies I'm going to need something wider. I know I can run old Nikon primes w/ an adapter but can someone shine some light as to which ones work best? I've been a Canon guy all my life so I don't really know how Nikon's older lens lines work. Should I maybe go for some Zeiss glass? I don't have the budget for Canon L glass so I want to keep the cost low and buy some older primes and stick adapters on each one.
Advertisement
JordanLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 10:10 AM   #2
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
Image sharpness isn't all that important to videographers so I'd go down the route of buying older lenses with adapters.

I was thinking of selling my Ziess 35-70 3.4 becasue I just don't use this lens anymore. If you can work with not having auto focus (which you can), this lens is better then 24-70 2.8 at more then half the price.
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 07:27 PM   #3
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Some of the older Nikon lenses are really amazing. As Tom said, you don't need ultimate sharpness, as the most you can shoot at is 1080p. Besides, some L lenses are shit.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 08:03 PM   #4
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever View Post
Besides, some L lenses are shit.
Which ones?
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 08:15 PM   #5
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Mostly the older ones like the 35mm f1.4, 100-400, 24-70, 70-200 f2.8 IS, 24mm f1.4 I, 24mm TS-E I. Not really shit, but potentially soft on a high pixel density DSLR. They should be ok for 1080p video though.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 08:22 PM   #6
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Didn't know that... I thought the 24-70 was one of Canon's best lenses? (isn't the Nikon 24-70 good?)
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 08:51 PM   #7
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
What do you mean by 'best'?

It is certainly not one of the sharpest. Nikon's 24-70 & the Sony/Zeiss 24-70 are noticeably sharper than the Canon...and the Sony/Zeiss has image stabilization. The Sony/Zeiss is probably the sharpest of the three, but Zeiss has sacrificed smooth bokeh for ultimate sharpness, while the Nikon is probably the best compromise of the three. Don't worry, as I'm sure Canon is going to update the 24-70 very soon, as it is the oldest one of the group - possibly with IS.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net