View Full Version
:
better to scan negatives or pictures?
is it better to have negatives scanned? or get the printed pictures scanned? I found old rolls developed... they were never great pictures to begin with - ie, poor focus etc - cheap cameras...
and where's a decent cheap place to do it? i don't think my cheap ass scanner (that i can't find drivers for windows 7) is going to hack it...
Senna4ever
09-05-2010, 02:22 PM
G.King does it at a decent price...about $1 or $2 per image at 300dpi.
thanks, so i guess i should bring in the negatives?
w00tgasm
09-05-2010, 08:18 PM
Scanning negatives > Prints
soooooo..... i finally made it to G. King today...
there was a notice on the door, something about 62k in rent not paid, and they changed the locks...
any other suggestions? hehe... thanks!
Senna4ever
11-03-2010, 05:22 PM
Yeah, I heard they went out of business. A little sad, but the new owners really ruined killed the business.
Try ABC Colour or The Lab.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.