REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2010, 07:22 PM   #1
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
N.V.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 5,112
Thanked 4,912 Times in 887 Posts
Failed 886 Times in 164 Posts
bought a Canon,body only.

upgrading into better equipment and bought a A1 condition,body only:



so, lenses. for a general purpose kind of lense, i was thinking of going with this:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/r...ns-review.aspx




looks like it's in the $1k range, give or take. it's got the red ring of excellence, so what do you think? any other suggestions? (outdoor shots mostly)
Advertisement
__________________
now what?
N.V.M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 07:27 PM   #2
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
The 24-105 is a decent walk about lens. At a constant f4, it is a little slow for low light situations. Just remember that the 1DmkII N is an APS-H sensor so you need to multiply the focal length by 1.3x. The lens will not be as wide as it is on a full frame camera.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 07:23 PM   #3
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
N.V.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 5,112
Thanked 4,912 Times in 887 Posts
Failed 886 Times in 164 Posts
good to know, thanks.
__________________
now what?
N.V.M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 02:06 AM   #4
Got MOD?
 
!MiKrofT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,919
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
Outdoor like landscapes? Maybe something wider like 17-40 L?
__________________
[NS] Niteshadow.ca
'95 Integra RS R.I.P.
My Feedback (50-0-0)
!MiKrofT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 10:24 AM   #5
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Levitron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rmd, BC
Posts: 9,951
Thanked 378 Times in 66 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 7 Posts
I second the 17-40 f4L suggestion. It served me well on my 20D and now onto full-frame duty on my 5D.

Out of all my lenses I use it the most...that is, until I jump up to the 16-35 f2.8L
__________________
All hail 2.3 turbo
RIP: long live 1.6
-Former S.O.M.O. Vive la resistance!
-MFC Fan # 3
-RS ELITE NINJA smurf-ninja
-L.B.C.: REVscene's Resident Lowballers
-RS Photography Crew WpnOfChoice: Sony DSC-F717~"Dana"


http://www.flickr.com/duckducksnap
Levitron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 02:25 PM   #6
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,335
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
16-35 isn't worth it imo unless you need that extra stop of light.
MikesJo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 12:56 AM   #7
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Levitron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rmd, BC
Posts: 9,951
Thanked 378 Times in 66 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikesJo View Post
16-35 isn't worth it imo unless you need that extra stop of light.
...and that's exactly why I would want it
__________________
All hail 2.3 turbo
RIP: long live 1.6
-Former S.O.M.O. Vive la resistance!
-MFC Fan # 3
-RS ELITE NINJA smurf-ninja
-L.B.C.: REVscene's Resident Lowballers
-RS Photography Crew WpnOfChoice: Sony DSC-F717~"Dana"


http://www.flickr.com/duckducksnap
Levitron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2010, 07:46 PM   #8
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
N.V.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 5,112
Thanked 4,912 Times in 887 Posts
Failed 886 Times in 164 Posts
bought an EF 35mm f/2 prime lens, just so i could play with my new machine. went to a street festival today out in the rain, results weren't half bad.







__________________
now what?
N.V.M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2010, 10:40 PM   #9
Got MOD?
 
!MiKrofT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,919
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
LOL. Those kids in the first pick sure look unhappy.
__________________
[NS] Niteshadow.ca
'95 Integra RS R.I.P.
My Feedback (50-0-0)
!MiKrofT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net