View Full Version
:
need help deciding on a suv
FerrariEnzo
10-28-2010, 05:05 PM
im looking to get an older SUV.. something around 1996-1998...
should i got with jap like 4runner/pathfinder.. or go domestic with the explorer/jimmy/blazer type?
this will be a winter SUV, so 4x4 is a must..
anyone with good/bad experience with these particular years of suvs? anything to watch out for thats costly to repair
seakrait
10-28-2010, 05:16 PM
watch out for older pathfinders, super easy to steal as the keys and ignition get worn down, so much so that any key (or screwdriver) will open it and start it. that's my limited experience anyway...
Phatmobile
10-28-2010, 05:48 PM
what's your price range?
get a 2002+ Pathfinder if that's within your price range, the 3.5L engine is so much better than the 3.3L
Redlines_Daily
10-28-2010, 05:49 PM
I used to have a 4x4 Jimmy, the only thing I ever had to fix were the shocks that open that back window.
older 4runners are built like tanks. my friend had a 96 4banger and it had like 350,000 kms and was still running strong. he was telling me they are known to go up to 500,000 km. i believe him
jpark
10-28-2010, 07:33 PM
^yess +1 on the 4runners, those things wont die
+1 with 4runners, my neighbor has a 95 4runner i believe...? but anyways he bought it straight from the dealer and it still running... i believe he is around 330km?
asahai69
10-28-2010, 07:54 PM
jeep
/thread
danizer
10-28-2010, 07:59 PM
http://www.ssip.net/upload/lamborghini-lm002-front-1_149.jpg
how can you say no?
4runner should be a good choice though..there has to be a reason there are a million of them in east side
boss604
10-28-2010, 09:07 PM
4runner or pathfinder !
CorneringArtist
10-28-2010, 09:34 PM
+1 for 4runner. but I hear that some of the V6's are POS'es, and people switch to or try to find the 4-banger version.
Can anyone elaborate?
FerrariEnzo
10-28-2010, 10:41 PM
watch out for older pathfinders, super easy to steal as the keys and ignition get worn down, so much so that any key (or screwdriver) will open it and start it. that's my limited experience anyway...
I used to have a 4x4 Jimmy, the only thing I ever had to fix were the shocks that open that back window.
Very useful tips..
Thanx
I dont really want to spend a whole lot as its only for winter driving, mostly on the highway to chillwack... so getting a 2002+ would be outa my price range.
Since a lot of you guys recommend the 4runner, i will look into that... which years of the 4runners are good.. after 95?
Volvo-brickster
10-28-2010, 10:42 PM
what's your price range?
get a 2002+ Pathfinder if that's within your price range, the 3.5L engine is so much better than the 3.3L
3.5's are notorious for the power valve failing and burning up the motor because of a dropped screw
El Dumbasso
10-28-2010, 11:26 PM
DO EET!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v332/dumbass/anpathfinder.jpg
Renthal
10-29-2010, 02:52 AM
+1 for 4runner. but I hear that some of the V6's are POS'es, and people switch to or try to find the 4-banger version.
Can anyone elaborate?
the 3.0L from 87-95 is a bit of a POS if you get an auto tranny. They had shitty headgaskets from the factory and were a factory recall.
the 3.4L V6 in the 96+ is the motor to get... lots of power and not too hard on gas.
The 2.4L is damn near bulletproof and good for around town and minor hauling and good on gas. I prefer the V6 for power.
FerrariEnzo
10-29-2010, 03:35 AM
so pretty much from '96 and on....
!Aznboi128
10-29-2010, 05:20 AM
96+ 4runner's still are quite pricey. I would say get a pathfinder the 3.3 from 95-99 is pretty good and doesn't have a jacked up price of a 4runner.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
1BADMR2
10-29-2010, 05:25 AM
.
Mugen EvOlutioN
10-29-2010, 08:30 AM
4 runner definitely gets my vote, very reliable and nice off road capability
Volvo-brickster
10-29-2010, 09:39 AM
I have a 92 pathfinder...no real issues other than regular maintenance and what comes with owning an older car. Just stay away from AT pathy and check for frame rot
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
RRxtar
10-29-2010, 09:41 AM
you could pick up a 92 jeep cherokee with a 4.0L I6 for like $500 and it will run for 500,000kms
or for more creature comforts find a 93-98 grand cherokee with a v8. 96-98 had an facelift
or if you like japanese you cant go wrong with a 4runner
i would stay away from jimmys/blazers
asahai69
10-29-2010, 10:00 AM
if your gonna get a jeep. stay away from the ones with a V8. the I6 is far more reliable. those engines were bullet proof. we had a 97 grand cherokee. ran for over 300,000km with only the water pump going bad. sumone hit it last year and it got written off or we would still have it.
alwaysideways
10-29-2010, 10:54 AM
Have you given any thought to a CRV?
OTG-ZR2
10-29-2010, 10:55 AM
If you want something cheap and dependable get a blazer or jimmy .
There solid trucks, the 4.3L V6 is one of the best motors GM ever made its a scaled down version of a 350ci or 5.7L. The autos (700R4) are solid too. Standards (NV3500?) are better yet.
I own a 95 s10 zr2, daily driver, off roader, toy hauler, and its seen allot of abuse. Nothing major has failed yet at 240k. Original motor, tranny, diff's, transfer case. Parts are common and dirt cheap for these trucks anyways.
Gh0stRider
10-29-2010, 10:57 AM
I like the old 4runners. I was gonna get one.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
FerrariEnzo
10-30-2010, 05:07 AM
Have you given any thought to a CRV?
ive looked into the rav4's and crv's, but seems a really pricey still for..
you could pick up a 92 jeep cherokee with a 4.0L I6 for like $500 and it will run for 500,000kms
where did you see this ad?? very interested
JesseBlue
10-30-2010, 08:35 AM
how about older subaru foresters?
RRxtar
10-31-2010, 08:51 PM
ive looked into the rav4's and crv's, but seems a really pricey still for..
where did you see this ad?? very interested
there isnt an ad. i know several people who have bought cherokees for well under $1000.
valent|n0
11-01-2010, 12:17 PM
1996 4 cylinder 4 runner is it 2.4 or 2.7?
valent|n0
11-01-2010, 12:18 PM
how about older subaru foresters?
for 1998 - 2002 (some 2003) model forester
make sure the head gasket is done recently and properly (~$2000 job to do)
they are prone to leaks if not maintain properly
l2_narain
11-02-2010, 02:24 AM
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/rch/ctd/1995911646.html
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/rds/cto/2019099223.html
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/rds/cto/2033592839.html
my friend picked up one of these in the middle of October as he needed a truck for winter with 4x4. Pretty comfortable ride but 17L/100km city is pretty heavy. paid $4000 for 00 with 220k.
SpuGen
11-02-2010, 06:38 AM
^
WT EFFFF.
They were closer to 7/8 when I was looking for one 1+ years ago.
too_slow
11-02-2010, 08:13 AM
what's your price range?
get a 2002+ Pathfinder if that's within your price range, the 3.5L engine is so much better than the 3.3L
I would stick with the pre-faclifted 3.3V6 version for the reason that they've switched over to aluminum suspension components on MY1999+ and above. They wear out a lot faster, and aren't cheap to replace..
RangeRover
11-03-2010, 09:58 PM
^yess +1 on the 4runners, those things wont die
What about a Jeep cherokee? I heard those are pretty decent as well.
GabAlmighty
11-03-2010, 10:11 PM
3rd Gen 4runner with an e-locker. I belive the 3rd gen's have the most ground clearance of the 4runners and the e-locker is win. Also came with the 3.4 which is a much better motor than the 3.0.
Jeep drivetrains like to go boom if you wheel them so i'm told.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.