PDA

View Full Version

: Twinkie diet helps nutrition professor lose 27 pounds


ilvtofu
11-08-2010, 04:34 PM
For 10 weeks, Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University, ate one of these sugary cakelets every three hours, instead of meals. To add variety in his steady stream of Hostess and Little Debbie snacks, Haub munched on Doritos chips, sugary cereals and Oreos, too.
His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most -- not the nutritional value of the food.

The premise held up: On his "convenience store diet," he shed 27 pounds in two months.

For a class project, Haub limited himself to less than 1,800 calories a day. A man of Haub's pre-dieting size usually consumes about 2,600 calories daily. So he followed a basic principle of weight loss: He consumed significantly fewer calories than he burned.

His body mass index went from 28.8, considered overweight, to 24.9, which is normal. He now weighs 174 pounds.

But you might expect other indicators of health would have suffered. Not so.

Haub's "bad" cholesterol, or LDL, dropped 20 percent and his "good" cholesterol, or HDL, increased by 20 percent. He reduced the level of triglycerides, which are a form of fat, by 39 percent.

"That's where the head scratching comes," Haub said. "What does that mean? Does that mean I'm healthier? Or does it mean how we define health from a biology standpoint, that we're missing something?"
Haub's sample day

Espresso, Double: 6 calories; 0 grams of fat

Hostess Twinkies Golden Sponge Cake: 150 calories; 5 grams of fat

Centrum Advanced Formula From A To Zinc: 0 calories; 0 grams of fat

Little Debbie Star Crunch: 150 calories; 6 grams of fat

Hostess Twinkies Golden Sponge Cake: 150 calories; 5 grams of fat

Diet Mountain Dew: 0 calories; 0 grams of fat

Doritos Cool Ranch: 75 calories; 4 grams of fat

Kellogg's Corn Pops: 220 calories; 0 grams of fat

whole milk: 150 calories; 8 grams of fat

baby carrots: 18 calories; 0 grams of fat

Duncan Hines Family Style Brownie Chewy Fudge: 270 calories; 14 grams of fat

Little Debbie Zebra Cake: 160 calories; 8 grams of fat

Muscle Milk Protein Shake: 240 calories; 9 grams of fat

Totals: 1,589 calories and 59 grams of fat

Despite his temporary success, Haub does not recommend replicating his snack-centric diet.

"I'm not geared to say this is a good thing to do," he said. "I'm stuck in the middle. I guess that's the frustrating part. I can't give a concrete answer. There's not enough information to do that."

Two-thirds of his total intake came from junk food. He also took a multivitamin pill and drank a protein shake daily. And he ate vegetables, typically a can of green beans or three to four celery stalks.

Families who live in food deserts have limited access to fresh fruits and vegetables, so they often rely on the kind of food Haub was eating.

"These foods are consumed by lots of people," he said. "It may be an issue of portion size and moderation rather than total removal. I just think it's unrealistic to expect people to totally drop these foods for vegetables and fruits. It may be healthy, but not realistic."

Haub's body fat dropped from 33.4 to 24.9 percent. This posed the question: What matters more for weight loss, the quantity or quality of calories?

His success is probably a result of caloric reduction, said Dawn Jackson Blatner, a dietitian based in Atlanta, Georgia.

"It's a great reminder for weight loss that calories count," she said. "Is that the bottom line to being healthy? That's another story."

Blatner, a spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association, said she's not surprised to hear Haub's health markers improved even when he
loaded up on processed snack cakes.

Being overweight is the central problem that leads to complications like high blood pressure, diabetes and high cholesterol, she said.
How well are you managing your diabetes?

"When you lose weight, regardless of how you're doing it -- even if it's with packaged foods, generally you will see these markers improve when weight loss has improved," she said.

Before jumping on the Ding Dong bandwagon, Blatner warned of health concerns.

"There are things we can't measure," said Blatner, questioning how the lack of fruits and vegetables could affect long-term health. "How much does that affect the risk for cancer? We can't measure how diet changes affect our health."
I was eating healthier, but I wasn't healthy. I was eating too much.

On August 25, Haub, 41, started his cake diet focusing on portion control.
"I'm eating to the point of need and pushing the plate or wrapper away," he said.

He intended the trial to last a month as a teaching tool for his class. As he lost weight, Haub continued the diet until he reached a normal body mass index.

Before his Twinkie diet, he tried to eat a healthy diet that included whole grains, dietary fiber, berries and bananas, vegetables and occasional treats like pizza.

"There seems to be a disconnect between eating healthy and being healthy," Haub said. "It may not be the same. I was eating healthier, but I wasn't healthy. I was eating too much."

He maintained the same level of moderate physical activity as before going on the diet. (Haub does not have any ties to the snack cake companies.)
To avoid setting a bad example for his kids, Haub ate vegetables in front of his family. Away from the dinner table, he usually unwrapped his meals.
Haub monitored his body composition, blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose, and updated his progress on his Facebook page, Professor Haub's diet experiment.

To curb calories, he avoided meat, whole grains and fruits. Once he started adding meat into the diet four weeks ago, his cholesterol level increased.
Haub plans to add about 300 calories to his daily intake now that he's done with the diet. But he's not ditching snack cakes altogether. Despite his weight loss, Haub feels ambivalence.

"I wish I could say the outcomes are unhealthy. I wish I could say it's healthy. I'm not confident enough in doing that. That frustrates a lot of people. One side says it's irresponsible. It is unhealthy, but the data doesn't say that."

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/index.html

_Hotsauce_
11-08-2010, 05:11 PM
Pretty sure the title should be ``That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most -- not the nutritional value of the food.

Oleophobic
11-08-2010, 06:35 PM
but if you're already at 33.4% which is pretty fat, you can pretty much just drop calories while eating junk and still lose fat (with muscle along with that).
As bf gets lower like sub 20% and approaching 10%, quality of calories starts to have a more significant impact on fat loss.

trancehead
11-08-2010, 06:47 PM
but if you're already at 33.4% which is pretty fat, you can pretty much just drop calories while eating junk and still lose fat (with muscle along with that).
As bf gets lower like sub 20% and approaching 10%, quality of calories starts to have a more significant impact on fat loss.

i agree

this articles full of horseshit

b0unce. [?]
11-08-2010, 07:41 PM
i literally have never had a twinkie in my life. does it even taste any good?

shawn79
11-08-2010, 08:42 PM
;7178606']i literally have never had a twinkie in my life. does it even taste any good?

moist pound cake with cheap whip cream in the middle

MG1
11-08-2010, 10:04 PM
More like shortcake with light icing in the middle.

Not moist. Spongy maybe..........

Pound cake is actually pretty good. Heavier.

Anyway..............

LiquidTurbo
11-08-2010, 10:53 PM
What a fucking idiot. What kind of fucking professor does this shit?

rsx
11-09-2010, 12:35 AM
what's the sugar count!?

lgman
11-09-2010, 12:58 AM
What a fucking idiot. What kind of fucking professor does this shit?

http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2003/04/10/image548613g.jpg

Steak anyone?

goo3
11-09-2010, 01:09 AM
What a fucking idiot. What kind of fucking professor does this shit?

a fat one who can emphasize portion control to his fat students

His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most -- not the nutritional value of the food.

The premise held up: On his "convenience store diet," he shed 27 pounds in two months.

AccordCouped
11-09-2010, 01:12 AM
junk food is just hyped up by the media

Nightwalker
11-09-2010, 05:46 AM
Cool, I've done similar myself. Losing weight on all McDonalds during Monopoly and the such.

danizer
11-09-2010, 08:10 AM
someone is gonna have diabetes pretty soon

gdoh
11-09-2010, 08:24 AM
what a garbage diet

InvisibleSoul
11-09-2010, 09:20 AM
For 10 weeks, Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University, ate one of these sugary cakelets every three hours, instead of meals. To add variety in his steady stream of Hostess and Little Debbie snacks, Haub munched on Doritos chips, sugary cereals and Oreos, too.

It's not like junk food was all that he was eating... pretty weak study, in my opinion.

whole milk: 150 calories; 8 grams of fat

baby carrots: 18 calories; 0 grams of fat

Muscle Milk Protein Shake: 240 calories; 9 grams of fat

Two-thirds of his total intake came from junk food. He also took a multivitamin pill and drank a protein shake daily. And he ate vegetables, typically a can of green beans or three to four celery stalks.

Meowjin
11-09-2010, 10:16 AM
I totally agree. IT's all about caloric count although processed foods are the devil.

orange7
11-09-2010, 11:03 AM
internet.

don't believe everything you read.

bengy
11-09-2010, 01:09 PM
Soooo, if you stop eating like a pig, you'll also stop looking like one?!!!

kazuki
11-09-2010, 05:56 PM
someone is gonna have diabetes pretty soon

Being overweight puts him at risk of diabetes. Hes actually losing weight so he is decreasing his risk for developing type 2 diabetes.

If he already has diabetes then all the sugar from the twinkies is a bad idea. If he doesn't have diabetes then its fine.

SkinnyPupp
11-09-2010, 06:09 PM
Being overweight puts him at risk of diabetes. Hes actually losing weight so he is decreasing his risk for developing type 2 diabetes.

If he already has diabetes then all the sugar from the twinkies is a bad idea. If he doesn't have diabetes then its fine.
That is worthy of the EPIC FACEPALM (click to zoom)

http://pic.phyrefile.com/n/na/narf/2010/06/14/facepalm.jpg

kazuki
11-09-2010, 06:11 PM
Why is there something wrong with what I said?

lol nice pic

SkinnyPupp
11-09-2010, 06:13 PM
Just that you are completely wrong about what causes type II diabetes, and are blindly following the advice given by those who want to do nothing more than keep people on diabetes and sell drugs to them.

kazuki
11-09-2010, 06:22 PM
Find me evidence that eating sugar can lead to insulin resistance. I can't seem to find any. I feel like that it is a common misconception that eating sugar leads to diabetes.

Being overweight, abdominal fat, lack of exercise and genetics are proven risk factors for diabetes.

BTW I don't blindly follow advice given to me.

SkinnyPupp
11-09-2010, 06:24 PM
:facepalm: is all I'm gonna say

LiquidTurbo
11-09-2010, 07:26 PM
Find me evidence that eating sugar can lead to insulin resistance. I can't seem to find any. I feel like that it is a common misconception that eating sugar leads to diabetes.

Being overweight, abdominal fat, lack of exercise and genetics are proven risk factors for diabetes.

BTW I don't blindly follow advice given to me.

For starters, eating sugar or any higher form of it, makes you fat.

kazuki
11-09-2010, 08:00 PM
Eating anything in excess makes you fat.

The point I'm trying to make is that a lot of people, including my parents, think that sugar is what is causing diabetes. When there is really no evidence to support it.

So fat is what puts you at risk of diabetes. Not how you got fat.

DragonChi
11-09-2010, 11:37 PM
"I understand why my father would not have wanted to consider the possibility that ice cream might have been involved. By this point he had manufactured and sold more ice cream than any human being who had ever lived on this planet. He didn't want to think that ice cream was harming anyone, much less that it might have contributed to the death of his beloved brother-in-law and partner. Besides, not much was commonly known then, in the late 1960s, about the connection between ice cream and disease.

But I saw the connection, as I did when my dad developed diabetes and high blood pressure, and again years later when Ben Cohen, co-founder of the ice cream company Ben & Jerry's, needed a quintuple bypass procedure at the age of forty-nine.

A single ice cream cone, of course, isn't going to harm anyone. But even though it tastes delicious, ice cream is very high in sugar and saturated fat. The medical data is overwhelmingly clear that the more sugar and saturated fat you eat, the more likely you are to experience heart disease and diabetes and to become obese."

http://www.openexchange.org/features/JFM10/robbins.html

Are you going to argue with the son of a ice cream maker?!

====================================
"Causes of Diabetes

The cause of Type I diabetes is genetically based, coupled with an abnormal immune response.


The cause of Type II diabetes is unknown. Medical experts believe that Type II diabetes has a genetic component, but that other factors also put people at risk for the disease. These factors include:


sedentary lifestyle

obesity (weighing 20 percent above a healthy body weight)

advanced age

unhealthy diet

family history of diabetes

improper functioning of the pancreas

minority race (higher risk in Black, Hispanic, American Indian, westernized Asian and native Hawaiian populations)

medication (cortisone and some high blood pressure drugs)

women having given birth to a baby weighing more than 9 lbs.

previously diagnosed gestational diabetes

previously diagnosed IGT"

http://www.healthcentral.com/encyclopedia/408/150.html

==============

There isn't a known cause, but I personally believe, if you eat too much sugar for too long, the insulin in your body stops working (resistance builds up, kinda like alcohol tolerance) and bam, the definition of diabetes.

Meowjin
11-09-2010, 11:41 PM
you said saturated fat, now skinnypupp is going to douche up the thread.

pastarocket
11-11-2010, 07:29 PM
This nutty professor increased his risk of heart disease and diabetes with that regular diet of junk food. It's shocking that this fool teaches human nutrition at the U.S. university.

SkinnyPupp
11-11-2010, 07:37 PM
you said saturated fat, now skinnypupp is going to douche up the thread.
You're doing a spectacular job of that already, thanks :thumbsup:

pastarocket
11-11-2010, 07:44 PM
Haha, this nutty professor just increased his risk of diabetes.