| 
 
   | Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE.  While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |  
   |  |  |       |  11-18-2010, 11:47 AM | #1 |   | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon 
				  Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 7,760
				 
		
			
				Thanked 375 Times in 181 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 159 Times in 63 Posts
			
		
	   |  Olympic Village goes into receivership  
   SauceQuote:   | Last Updated: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 | 4:44 PM PT The Canadian Press
 
 The financially troubled Olympic Village in Vancouver has been put into receivership.
 
 The City of Vancouver announced Wednesday that it has negotiated an agreement with the accounting firm Ernst and Young to assume control of the Millennium Southeast False Creek Properties and the Millennium Water development, as the Olympic Village condominium project is now called.
 
 Following the 2010 Winter Games, units in the eight-block, 25-building village were to be turned into a combination of free-market condos and social housing.
 
 But sales never really picked up and in September, Millennium came up short on its loan payment and then said it didn't expect to finish selling the more than 400 remaining units for another 2½ years.
 
 Even before the Games, the developer's original lender stopped paying its loan, forcing the city to step in and secure hundreds of millions of dollars to finish the project in time.
 
 Millennium is scheduled to come up with another $75 million by January, but it is not clear now whether that payment must be made in light of Wednesday's announcement.
 
 |  
Fuck Sullivan for making stupid 11% loan.   
Party's over, Time to pay up everyone    
				__________________Ignorance is bliss
 
 How I wish I can remain ignorant, why do I know so much?
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 12:12 PM | #2 |   | I have named my kids VIC and VLS 
				  Join Date: Oct 2001 
					Posts: 39,479
				 
		
			
				Thanked 16,089 Times in 6,561 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 2,165 Times in 747 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			Really? People who pay big bucks for their units DONT want to live beside low income units that are given to people? 
Weird! Posted via RS Mobile |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 12:22 PM | #3 |   | SFICC-03* 
				  Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: richmond 
					Posts: 9,153
				 
		
			
				Thanked 3,824 Times in 1,513 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 166 Times in 87 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			mmmm sauce
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 01:13 PM | #4 |   | Proud to be called a RS Regular! 
				  Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: home 
					Posts: 139
				 
		
			
				Thanked 52 Times in 24 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 6 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Hondaracer  Really? People who pay big bucks for their units DONT want to live beside low income units that are given to people? 
Weird! Posted via RS Mobile |  DING DING, i think you got it right on the money. who the hell wants to pay top dollar to live in a supposedly nice neighbourhood with low income units given to people. bad mix, and creates problems with crime easily.  
its not going to ever sell unless they change that. 
i'm sure you don't want to see people that looks like bums in that area everytime you go in and out of that area. lol
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 01:15 PM | #5 |   | I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant! 
				  Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: CELICAland 
					Posts: 25,688
				 
		
			
				Thanked 10,397 Times in 3,920 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Hondaracer  Really? People who pay big bucks for their units DONT want to live beside low income units that are given to people? 
Weird! Posted via RS Mobile |  Woodwards.    
we all saw what those units looked like people with money dont want to live in a shithole apartment is all
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 01:34 PM | #6 |   | ...in the world. 
				  Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond 
					Posts: 28,466
				 
		
			
				Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			They should just scrap the idea to use it as low income housing.  That's just stupid.  Giving expensive condos to people?  I don't know how that's a good idea.
 They should just sell all of them at regular price to recoup some of the money we spent on the Olympics.
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 01:54 PM | #7 |   | Rs has made me the woman i am today! 
				  Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 4,310
				 
		
			
				Thanked 580 Times in 230 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 771 Times in 208 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			I have a feeling if they knock 100k off the price people would still not be buying, as they have been "used" by the athletes so no new home warranty.If they chose to hold onto them it would be a MEGA LOLZ because of the shoddy construction and mold from the piping coming thru the walls is gonna bite them in the ass HARD.
 Best thing they can do is rent these out since theres a "shortage" of rental housing in the lowermainland.
 Then again it would be pretty funny to see it all go to social housing since they are also short on that... and where else in the world could bums on welfare live on the waterfront but vancouver~!
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 03:03 PM | #8 |   | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS 
				  Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Cloverdale 
					Posts: 11,620
				 
		
			
				Thanked 3,878 Times in 1,372 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 83 Times in 42 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			It could be worse, at least the city still has the asset. Just take away the low income housing, cut your losses selling it all as high end condos and they can probably get most if not all there money back.............Who are we kidding, they aren't that smart.
		 
				__________________
 
 
 “The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place... and I don´t care how tough you are, it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently, if you let it. You, me or nobody, is gonna hit as hard as life. But ain't about how hard you hit... It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward... how much you can take, and keep moving forward. That´s how winning is done. Now, if you know what you worth, go out and get what you worth.” - Rocky Balboa
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 03:14 PM | #9 |   | Everyone wants a piece of R S... 
				  Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: 604 
					Posts: 378
				 
		
			
				Thanked 33 Times in 18 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 37 Times in 6 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			^ LOL, waterfront property for the homeless. That just made my day    |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 04:04 PM | #10 |   | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right! 
				  Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Richmond 
					Posts: 1,360
				 
		
			
				Thanked 659 Times in 201 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 93 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			After watching streets of plenty.... giving a large area of real estate (olympic village_) might mean a 2nd underbelly of Vancouver. As seen from the documentary, when generous social support is given, people WILL take advantage of the support. It's gonna be another shithole.
		 
				__________________  Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by JSALES  While driving yesterday I saw a banana peel in the road and instinctively swerved to avoid it...thanks Mario Kart. |  |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 04:09 PM | #11 |   | I have named my kids VIC and VLS 
				  Join Date: Oct 2001 
					Posts: 39,479
				 
		
			
				Thanked 16,089 Times in 6,561 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 2,165 Times in 747 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Death2Theft  I have a feeling if they knock 100k off the price people would still not be buying, as they have been "used" by the athletes so no new home warranty.If they chose to hold onto them it would be a MEGA LOLZ because of the shoddy construction and mold from the piping coming thru the walls is gonna bite them in the ass HARD.
 Best thing they can do is rent these out since theres a "shortage" of rental housing in the lowermainland.
 Then again it would be pretty funny to see it all go to social housing since they are also short on that... and where else in the world could bums on welfare live on the waterfront but vancouver~!
 |  Warantee's are valid over time, not through owners, and its not like any of the athletes were considered owners anyways..
		 
				__________________Dank memes cant melt steel beams
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 05:19 PM | #12 |   | Rs has made me the woman i am today! 
				  Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 4,310
				 
		
			
				Thanked 580 Times in 230 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 771 Times in 208 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			I sure hope so because its sure as hell isn't "new"
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 05:48 PM | #13 |   | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in! 
				  Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 1,687
				 
		
			
				Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Hondaracer  Really? People who pay big bucks for their units DONT want to live beside low income units that are given to people? 
Weird! Posted via RS Mobile |  let's pay $700,000 so we can live next to people who are on welfare. I pay almost 3/4 of a million just to be neighbours with crack addicts!
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 05:50 PM | #14 |   | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in! 
				  Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 1,687
				 
		
			
				Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by quasi  It could be worse, at least the city still has the asset. Just take away the low income housing, cut your losses selling it all as high end condos and they can probably get most if not all there money back.............Who are we kidding, they aren't that smart. |  I agree, get rid of the social housing and sell it for a lot cheaper and we can cut some of our losses.
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 06:03 PM | #15 |   | Rs has made me the woman i am today! 
				  Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 4,310
				 
		
			
				Thanked 580 Times in 230 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 771 Times in 208 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			How different is that than woodwards?  Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Hondaracer  Really? People who pay big bucks for their units DONT want to live beside low income units that are given to people? 
Weird! Posted via RS Mobile |  |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 06:24 PM | #16 |   | Banned By Establishment 
				  Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: New West 
					Posts: 3,998
				 
		
			
				Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 284 Times in 109 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			So, like no one is surprised, right? 
 Gov't should not be in private business. Period. They cannot make business decisions because they piss off people with the decision. A business would make the call to curb spending due to the real estate market...vancouver doubled down and went LEED Platinum.
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 07:52 PM | #17 |   | My homepage has been set to RS 
				  Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 2,308
				 
		
			
				Thanked 825 Times in 341 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 203 Times in 77 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			the really fucked up part is that the olympics were going quite smoothly, debt-wise. We went in knowing that there's a problem with getting into debt post-olympics and for the most part we were pretty smart about it. Sure, we spent a lot on security and maybe there were a couple of mishaps, but overall, things were looking ok and they are ok. We had one of the most fun olympics, everyone supported VANOC, the canada line is actually useful and it was looking as if we would come outta debt pretty soon.
 But then some idiots who decided to put million-dollar furniture into the olymipc village housing got greedy and took us for a bunch of suckers. Seriously, when the athletes were living in the residencies, they were empty. Now they're fulla 250,000 dollar couches, located in a shitty area and being sold for way more than they should be.
 
 That for me is the true sad part - that some greedy morons trying to profit off our 5 minutes of fame fucked it all up, using our money.
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 09:18 PM | #18 |   | HELP ME PLS!!! 
				  Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Canada 
					Posts: 5,647
				 
		
			
				Thanked 1,816 Times in 450 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 4,294,967,295 Times in 173 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			sometime vancouver is so fucked up that word cant really describe it
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 09:23 PM | #19 |   | I have named my kids VIC and VLS 
				  Join Date: Oct 2001 
					Posts: 39,479
				 
		
			
				Thanked 16,089 Times in 6,561 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 2,165 Times in 747 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Death2Theft  How different is that than woodwards? |  even in the ground floor of the woodwards tower, your neighbor IN the building is not a junkie  
the low income housing inside athletes village is in the same buildings/adjoining buildings of your 700k unit..  
Woodwards building sold out on pre-sale  
Athletes Village is still empty.
		 
				__________________Dank memes cant melt steel beams
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 09:38 PM | #20 |   | HELP ME PLS!!! 
				  Join Date: May 2001 Location: South Central V 
					Posts: 5,538
				 
		
			
				Thanked 519 Times in 210 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 55 Times in 21 Posts
			
		
	   |  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRQQ4U3YRDk#t=6m45s 
this is our mayor we elected.  he is going to end homelessness!  
fuck red light robertson.
		 
				__________________Visit my food blog! http://jaxandcs.com/  *its not the size of your army that matters; it's the fury of it's onslaught!*  █♣█ 
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 09:49 PM | #21 |   | My homepage has been set to RS 
				  Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Van 
					Posts: 2,050
				 
		
			
				Thanked 192 Times in 118 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 49 Times in 32 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Gridlock  So, like no one is surprised, right? 
 Gov't should not be in private business. Period. They cannot make business decisions because they piss off people with the decision. A business would make the call to curb spending due to the real estate market...vancouver doubled down and went LEED Platinum.
 |  avg cost for each unit is about $1million LOL..
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 10:01 PM | #22 |   | Wanna have a threesome? 
				  Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Squamish 
					Posts: 4,889
				 
		
			
				Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			Honestly, I'm still confused why which athlete stayed in the unit your buying is kept secret.
		   Last edited by MindBomber; 11-18-2010 at 10:10 PM.
 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 10:21 PM | #23 |   | Need my Daily Fix of RS 
				  Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 257
				 
		
			
				Thanked 22 Times in 7 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by MindBomber  Honestly, I'm still confused why which athlete stayed in the unit your buying is kept secret. |  Revealing it might increase sales. I am sure people would pay more than market value for Crosby or Luongo's unit, as stupid as it sounds.
		 |   |   |   |      |  11-18-2010, 11:36 PM | #24 |   | The Lone Wanderator 
				  Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby 
					Posts: 12,091
				 
		
			
				Thanked 4,385 Times in 1,138 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 192 Times in 75 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			The only reason that people flood to social housing and units like this is because there is insufficient support in general for the underprivileged.  So whenever a new chance opens up, the people who need it will all aim for it.
 The idea of concentrating social services where the homeless and needy already converge simply reinforces the existing ghettoisation.  Introducing social housing in most if not all new developments will serve not only to take those in need away from the areas and the problems that cause them to be in those situations.
 |   |   |   |     |  11-18-2010, 11:46 PM | #25 |   | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me! 
				  Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Van 
					Posts: 638
				 
		
			
				Thanked 24 Times in 14 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 6 Times in 5 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			My coworker had a walk thru of the units today.
 Let's just say that materials used and workmanship is below par.
 
 I'm going to say it now, no one will ever buy them.
 |   |   |   |    |  |  |  
 
   |    |  Posting Rules |   |  You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
 All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 AM. 
 |