REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2011, 08:12 AM   #1
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 225
Thanked 24 Times in 10 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 6 Posts
crash test dummies not fat enough

Quote:
Originally Posted by hpw912 View Post
Kiddie crash test dummies not fat enough
By David Menzies for MSN Autos

Engineers who design crash test dummies apparently need to supersize the kiddie version: child-sized crash test dummies simply aren’t fat enough to measure up to today’s increasingly obese kids. The end result: a number of children’s car seats aren’t being properly tested given that a sufficiently chubby kiddie crash test dummy hasn’t been developed.

According to a report in the UK’s Daily Mail, stringent testing laws only apply to seats that are designed to carry children who weigh less than 65 lbs. But with more than 10% of two- to three-year-olds now clinically obese (and over the 65-lb. weight limit) it’s feared federally-accredited child seat tests (and the dummies used in the testing) fail to accurately reflect today’s chubbier children.

The lack of adequate testing means parents may end up squeezing their overweight offspring into seats that are too small – or into seats that aren’t officially certified.

While a growing number of manufacturers make child seats catering to toddlers who weigh up to 85 lbs., the lack of a similarly weighted test dummy means these seats cannot be assessed by authorities. Instead, it’s up to each individual company to “assure” the safety of their own seats.

Of note, a 2006 study entitled, “Tipping the Scales: Obese Children and Child Safety Seats”, found a growing mismatch between the number of fatter children and the lack of adequately tested child seats.
“There is limited availability of child safety seat types for the ever-increasing number of obese young children,” researchers noted. “There are substantial numbers of children who weigh more than the upper weight limit for most currently available child safety seats.”



While modern adult crash test dummies have been in development for decades, their child counterparts are significantly less advanced. This is partly due to the reluctance of testers to use child cadavers to gain vital research into how a child’s body reacts to a crash.
Even so, there are significant differences. The physiological make-up of a child differs from that of an adult given that children have less rigid spines and weaker chests than adults – two key aspects missing from the child test dummy currently used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The NHTSA uses a smaller version of its adult crash test dummy to test child seats. And while a new child crash test dummy was supposed to be built by 2004, researchers are still waiting for a finished product.

Autumn Alexander Skeen – a car safety campaigner whose son was killed in a crash – says she’s disappointed with the delay.

“There’s not enough guidance,” she says. “Parents are looking at things like cup holders. They’re not coming to it looking at the correct way for the shoulder belt to cross the clavicle."
kids are too fat these days......so they plan to do something about the crash test dummies instead of how to get kids to stay healthy

http://www.thepassinglane.ca/2011/03...at-enough.html
Advertisement
hpw912 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2011, 09:51 AM   #2
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Us
Posts: 123
Thanked 35 Times in 13 Posts
Failed 38 Times in 12 Posts
damn those fat little fuckers
ImpactZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2011, 10:09 AM   #3
Rider
 
gdoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,269
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 100 Posts
parents who allow their kids to become obese before should not be allowed to have kids, and saying its the food companies fault doesn't excuse you for feeding your children crap
gdoh is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-19-2011, 12:49 AM   #4
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
PiuYi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New West
Posts: 3,163
Thanked 1,341 Times in 557 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 108 Posts
wow they use human cadavers to design crash test dummies?? never knew that
PiuYi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2011, 01:07 AM   #5
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,679
Thanked 10,395 Times in 3,918 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiuYi View Post
wow they use human cadavers to design crash test dummies?? never knew that
they harvest cadavers for collagen too for cosmetics (for reconstructive purposes)
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2011, 02:04 AM   #6
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
slammer111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,629
Thanked 273 Times in 90 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiuYi View Post
wow they use human cadavers to design crash test dummies?? never knew that
They did up until the 1960s. Not sure if they do now.

Oh yeah, everyone's getting fatter. I remember reading about Transport Canada raising passenger weights too when calculating weight + balance for flights. The "average adult male" (for calculation purposes) weighed 182lbs back in 1999, and who knows what it is now.

With that said, Canadians still seem thinner than Americans, based on what I see on the street. Seattle is scary.
slammer111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2011, 02:09 AM   #7
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Delta
Posts: 864
Thanked 47 Times in 36 Posts
Failed 125 Times in 40 Posts
haha, yeah there clothing sizes fit BIGGER than the ones in canada..

the XL is canada is like a L in the states... atleast at footlocker/champs 5 for 20$(usd) 30(cdn) shirts...
baggdis300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2011, 02:14 AM   #8
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
^ when I buy from the states, I make sure it's S :/. M in Canada fits me fine.
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 07:17 PM   #9
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Delta
Posts: 864
Thanked 47 Times in 36 Posts
Failed 125 Times in 40 Posts
oh i know lol, XL in canada doesn't fit loose enough for me..

while xl in usa is too big
baggdis300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 07:28 PM   #10
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
StaxBundlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,720
Thanked 2,116 Times in 382 Posts
Failed 877 Times in 94 Posts
__________________
Quote:
If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true; to be skeptical of those in authority, then we're up for grabs..
-Carl Sagan
StaxBundlez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net