View Full Version
:
2000 civic sir vs. 2003 rsx premium ..need your vote
dinamix
03-27-2011, 09:51 PM
Lookin to buy one of these cars soon. I need something better on gas. I'm in the market for a 6000-10000 price range
Ive narrowed my choices down to and rsx or sir ek?
Which one would you get and why?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
SoulCrusher
03-27-2011, 10:13 PM
SIR
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
Santofu
03-27-2011, 10:16 PM
I think RSX's insurance is higher but Ek save more gas
Personally, I like EK better.
deep87
03-27-2011, 10:20 PM
SIR - will be way more fun to drive, imo that's all that matters
twitchyzero
03-27-2011, 10:22 PM
isn't '00 SiR = EM1?
i think it's overall a nicer car than RSX unless you wanted a more upsscale/less dated interior w/ leather heated seats
theft is a bitch though for the EM1...hardly a problem with a DC5
Anjew
03-27-2011, 10:24 PM
I'd get the RSX. The interior is better. the car is less likely to be stolen. look is not as dated.
Leopold Stotch
03-27-2011, 10:32 PM
isn't '00 SiR = EM1?
i think it's overall a nicer car than RSX unless you wanted a more upsscale/less dated interior w/ leather heated seats
theft is a bitch though for the EM1...hardly a problem with a DC5
i think i'd be much happier with the RSX, bigger engine, with more torque, newer car and better looking imo.
manual and auto plays a huge factor as well for me, i would not get a rsx premium auto, but that's a personal thing
TypeRNammer
03-27-2011, 11:13 PM
EP3 :troll:
Cman333
03-27-2011, 11:22 PM
2000 SiR is EK
I would go RSX.
I have a 2000 SiR. Too many people tried to steal it. It's stop top stolen car in BC and it's like 11 years old and pretty few on the road.
My 2004 BMW 330i costed me less to insure than the civic.
Both cars are great reliable cars, I prefer the newer look of RSX and the interior is wayyyy nicer. The EK interior is this ugly grey interior
MindBomber
03-27-2011, 11:58 PM
EP3 :troll:
+1
toddzilla
03-28-2011, 12:06 AM
RSX hands down. Much nicer interior - styling that is aging far better imo - and when I shopped around and compared the 2 (as well as a Prelude) the RSX just had a more 'fits like a glove' feel. Of vourse I have an RSX-S and didn't shop the base model, but there's not a ton of difference other than 40 hp and some assorted tweaks, so long as you get the premium.
shtone
03-28-2011, 12:08 AM
none
dinamix
03-28-2011, 12:20 AM
I like the ep3. Its out of my price range
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
dinamix
03-28-2011, 12:21 AM
none
What do u suggest cool guy?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
Jgresch
03-28-2011, 12:23 AM
I like the ep3. Its out of my price range
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
it's similar price range to sir and rsx.....
FRStan
03-28-2011, 12:24 AM
my buddy is about to post his ep3 for sale... its within ur price range!
TypeRNammer
03-28-2011, 12:28 AM
I got mines for under 10 grand....
FRStan
03-28-2011, 12:35 AM
check his thread on vehicle F/S.. jus posted
dinamix
03-28-2011, 12:38 AM
my buddy is about to post his ep3 for sale... its within ur price range!than
Thanks!. 365000 km on body is kind of a turnoff..I'll check it out though
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
TypeRNammer
03-28-2011, 12:41 AM
than
Thanks!. 365000 km on body is kind of a turnoff..I'll check it out though
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
Hi
I'm testing waters to see if you know anyone interested in picking up a tafetta white 2004 civic sir.
104k
Stock with greddy axle back
Extra set of rsx rims on all seasons
No accidents
Asking$9999
Pm me if you want more details.
Here's a PM that I got recently, it's white and has low KMs!
my buddy is about to post his ep3 for sale... its within ur price range!
That EP3's body is in great shape for something with that kind of mileage!
FRStan
03-28-2011, 12:59 AM
yeah check it out. i took those photos and trust me you can't even tell its that high mileage!
impulseX
03-28-2011, 02:00 AM
none
What do u suggest cool guy?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
a bicycle since he couldn't downshift properly in his rsx
back on topic... i'd say em1 with a bit of a beefed up security system
TypeRNammer
03-28-2011, 02:11 AM
a bicycle since he couldn't downshift properly in his rsx
back on topic... i'd say em1 with a bit of a beefed up security system
and $300 deductible on comprehensive for the EM1
Sure it's gonna spike your annual insurance off the roof, but in the end it's worth it.
Unfortunately the EP3 falls into the same category as the RSX when it comes to insurance.
impulseX
03-28-2011, 02:17 AM
and $300 deductible on comprehensive for the EM1
Sure it's gonna spike your annual insurance off the roof, but in the end it's worth it.
Unfortunately the EP3 falls into the same category as the RSX when it comes to insurance.
sorta off topic, but not really.. how much is insurance(roughly) then if its in the same category
TypeRNammer
03-28-2011, 02:22 AM
sorta off topic, but not really.. how much is insurance(roughly) then if its in the same category
With 15% discount, it's roughly over $260 bucks a month for 300/300 collision/comprehensive and 2 mil liability.
Shugoy
03-28-2011, 08:59 AM
hmmmm
interior em1 < rsx
exterior em1 > rsx - i feel rsx's look a bit too girly.. no offence just my opinion
gas em1's are a mere 1.6 i get like 400+ kms per tank 350 if i drive hard
though my opinion is may be biast i do know em1s are a 10 year old car going to be alot of small things to do just like any older car but with the amount of parts there are for this car its not hard. but same with the rsx there are plenty of parts for it aswell and your less likly to have to fix anything up. My insurance for my em1 lo153$ a month with 40% off so its not bad. N as for theft just get a compustar but there again thats more money invested into an em1. haha anyways id say em1 just cuz =D
spoon.ek9
03-28-2011, 10:32 AM
i just want to clear this up:
99-00 SiR = EM1; this refers to the chassis code which you can see as part of the VIN.
96-00 USDM hb's = EJ6
yes, we commonly reference our hatches as EK's but in reality, there were no EK's made in canada/usa. EK4 and EK9 are JDM/EDM models.
Anyways, back to OP's question, it really depends what your needs are. If you're looking for comfort (interior and noise), you'd probably be happier with the RSX. If you're looking for something that is fun to drive, better on fuel, and better looking, you'll want the SiR.
There's actually a couple of very well taken care of SiR's that are for sale on VCC. They're also within your price range.
http://www.vancouvercivics.com/forums/viewthread.php?tid=102576
http://www.vancouvercivics.com/forums/viewthread.php?tid=102512
Personally, I'd rather have an SiR.
-EuroRSN-
03-28-2011, 11:34 AM
As much as i would love to say Join the Club and go with the RSX i wouldnt cause its a base. Perhaps go with a EP3 it will cost roughly the same as a Premium RSX and u get more out of it.
oldsnail
03-28-2011, 11:36 AM
nice, 2004 is the face lifted EP3..
Em1 SIR = PREM fuel vs Ep3 and DC5 regular fuel.
dinamix
03-28-2011, 12:09 PM
Here's a PM that I got recently, it's white and has low KMs!
That EP3's body is in great shape for something with that kind of mileage!
Thanks again for the link.
Does the ep3 use reg gas or premium?
You guys are making it so hard for me
I like The comfort and newer look of the Rsx premium .
I like the fun factor and clean look of the em1 . Slammed on SIR rims look so fresh
The ep3 is the best of both worlds!
Insurance- ep3 >Rsx>sir
Looks when stock - Rsx>ep3>sir
Looks when Modded sir> rsx>ep3
Comfort and interior - Rsx > ep3 > sir
Mpg -ep3 > rsx > sir
Interior space ???
Reliability???
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
TypeRNammer
03-28-2011, 12:33 PM
Have you driven all three cars before?
If not then you should try them all out.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
sobranie33
03-28-2011, 01:27 PM
YOu can buy my ep3 :fullofwin:
RevYouUp
03-28-2011, 03:17 PM
yea ep3!!!!!!!!!
2nd choice would be the rsx
TypeRNammer
03-28-2011, 03:20 PM
My first choice was the rsx before too.
The ep3 was just a back up plan :p
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
PK-EK
03-28-2011, 04:30 PM
SiR - real Vtak
and this coming from a RSX owner....
but...
if it was Vs. a Type S then
DC5S > SiR
or u could just buy my celica :trollface:
freelunch
03-28-2011, 07:23 PM
+1 for EP3!
If I ever see my old EP3 maybe i'd buy it back lol
tofu1413
03-28-2011, 07:32 PM
SiR - real Vtak
and this coming from a RSX owner....
but...
if it was Vs. a Type S then
DC5S > SiR
basically this.
depends on what you want though. for a daily driver a rsx premium should be good enough. but if you want more fun, EM1 SIR is better choice.
or you could start looking into the DC5S..
-EuroRSN-
03-28-2011, 07:40 PM
Save up more and get a TYPE S!!!
Mancini
03-28-2011, 07:59 PM
"It's a Si ;)"
death_blossom
03-28-2011, 08:34 PM
i just want to clear this up:
99-00 SiR = EM1; this refers to the chassis code which you can see as part of the VIN.
96-00 USDM hb's = EJ6
yes, we commonly reference our hatches as EK's but in reality, there were no EK's made in canada/usa. EK4 and EK9 are JDM/EDM models.
care to clarify why there is such a drastic difference in chassis codes used by Honda? is it cuz of the engine, or is there a lot more different in the uni-body chassis itself? such as more spot welds, better chassis strengthening, etc.
I'll throw in my two cents here. it all depends on what you want in a car. if you want something more modern and comfortable/classy, then the RSX will win that category by a mile. pure performance and driving fun would be won by the good ol' SiR. but then again, chassis performance and handling is also excellent on the RSX, u will be lacking a little in the power dept.
and as TypeRnammer said above, go test drive all the cars! personally, if you had your heart set on an EP3 then you should get an EP3. my philosophy is to never "settle" cuz you'd always be regretting.
tofu1413
03-28-2011, 08:47 PM
care to clarify why there is such a drastic difference in chassis codes used by Honda? is it cuz of the engine, or is there a lot more different in the uni-body chassis itself? such as more spot welds, better chassis strengthening, etc.
I'll throw in my two cents here. it all depends on what you want in a car. if you want something more modern and comfortable/classy, then the RSX will win that category by a mile. pure performance and driving fun would be won by the good ol' SiR. but then again, chassis performance and handling is also excellent on the RSX, u will be lacking a little in the power dept.
and as TypeRnammer said above, go test drive all the cars! personally, if you had your heart set on an EP3 then you should get an EP3. my philosophy is to never "settle" cuz you'd always be regretting.
all i know is, that the local "EK" body style cars are assembled and built in Canada... not Japan, most likely the reason why chassis codes on firewall is different.
CTR should get the normal Type R chassis treatment..
TypeRNammer
03-28-2011, 09:07 PM
and as TypeRnammer said above, go test drive all the cars! personally, if you had your heart set on an EP3 then you should get an EP3. my philosophy is to never "settle" cuz you'd always be regretting.
Honestly I wanted an RSX-S, but I couldn't find one in the right condition, even though I looked at over 6 of them.
In between my search, I saw the EP3 (which I currently own) that was on sale for craigslist for a few months.
I got sick looking for the ideal RSX-S so I settled for the EP3, which ended up being an impulsive purchase :fullofwin:
spoon.ek9
03-28-2011, 09:44 PM
care to clarify why there is such a drastic difference in chassis codes used by Honda? is it cuz of the engine, or is there a lot more different in the uni-body chassis itself? such as more spot welds, better chassis strengthening, etc.
my guess is that this is the best way to show the hierarchy of the different models. the japanese commonly refer to chassis codes rather than the names of the car because the codes are specific to the exact model. yes, there are differences in strength, weight, standard equipment and drivetrain. the type R's, of course, are the lightest and strongest of their generations. an easy example is the strength of the rear subframe on the hb's. EJ6's have a weak subframe and require a brace in order to run a large diameter rear sway bar. EK4's and EK9's have a stronger subframe and come standard with rear sway bars.
EJ6 (96-00 USDM CX/DX hb's) D16Y7 106hp non-vtec
EJ8 (96-00 CDM Si coupes) D16Y8 127hp vtec
EM1 (99-00 CDM SiR/USDM Si) B16A2 160hp vtec
EK4 (96-98 JDM SiR hb) B16A 170hp vtec
EK9 (97-00 JDM Type R) B16B 185hp vtec
aghog
03-29-2011, 07:50 PM
I have an SiR and my cousin had an RSX Type-S. I really liked the RSX; however, I was all about the styling and went for the SiR. Both great cars, Acura is known for their luxury edge over Honda.
You really have to try them both out to see which is right for you IMO.
Good luck!
jh604
03-29-2011, 08:10 PM
SiR - real Vtak
and this coming from a RSX owner....
but...
if it was Vs. a Type S then
DC5S > SiR
boosted sir > dc5s...QQtime
spoon.ek9
03-29-2011, 08:24 PM
you can't really compare a boosted em1 to a stock dc5s...
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.