REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-12-2011, 10:15 PM   #1
I want to be a person and not an icon.
 
Vale46Rossi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mugello
Posts: 4,179
Thanked 5,286 Times in 892 Posts
Failed 829 Times in 182 Posts
Mounties involved in Robert Dziekanski death face perjury charges

Quote:
VANCOUVER - The four Mounties involved in the Taser death of Robert Dziekanski will face perjury charges.

Special prosecutor Richard Peck announced the decision late Friday afternoon, after a lengthy review that included an examination of the circumstances surrounding the altercation with the 40-year-old Polish immigrant, the subsequent RCMP investigation into the death and the testimony of the four officers at the Braidwood Inquiry.

The charges will be forwarded to the Deputy Attorney-General for review and approval of proceeding by way of direct inditement.

Peck concluded there is "no substantial likelihood of conviction in relation to any potential charges arising from the circumstances of the physical altercation with Mr. Dziekanski or the subsequent investigation into his death," according to a media statement released by B.C.'s criminal justice branch.

Peck's decision overturns one made by retired retired justice Thomas Braidwood, who issued a final report last June 18 that heavily condemned the Cpl. Benjamin (Monty) Robinson and Constables Kwesi Millington, Bill Bentley and Gerry Rundel, yet recommended no charges against against them.

Victoria turned to Peck to review that decision.

Dziekanski died on Oct. 14, 2007, after RCMP officers repeatedly zapped him with a Taser at Vancouver International Airport, in an incident that garnered international attention when it was captured on video by another traveller.

Police were summoned after an agitated Dziekanski -- who was disoriented and did not speak English -- began throwing furniture around at the airport. He was then jolted several times with a stun gun, including shots made after he fell to the floor.

Statement from the Criminal Justice Branch:

Decision of Special Prosecutor Richard Peck, Q.C. Announced

Victoria - The Criminal Justice Branch of the Ministry of Attorney General today announced the results of Richard C.C. Peck, Q.C.'s independent charge assessment with respect to allegations of misconduct involving four members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as they pertain to the in-custody death of Robert Dziekanski at the Vancouver Airport on October 14, 2007. Mr. Peck's review included an examination of the circumstances of the physical altercation with Mr. Dziekanski, the subsequent RCMP investigation into his death and the testimony of the four officers at the Braidwood Inquiry.

Mr. Peck has recommended and the Criminal Justice Branch has accepted that each of the four officers be charged with perjury in relation to the evidence that each officer gave at the Braidwood Inquiry, and that the charges proceed by way of Direct Indictment.

Mr. Peck has concluded that there is no substantial likelihood of conviction in relation to any potential charges arising from the circumstances of the physical altercation with Mr. Dziekanski or the subsequent investigation into his death.

Mr. Peck's recommendations will be forwarded to the Deputy Attorney General for review and approval of proceeding by way of Direct Indictment.

This Media Statement has been issued today in response to information indicating that aspects of Mr. Peck's recommendations had entered the public domain and were expected to be the subject of media reports.

A more detailed Clear Statement in relation to Mr. Peck's conclusions will be released publicly once the Deputy Attorney General has completed his review of Mr. Peck's recommendations. The Clear Statement will not contain details about the decision to not approve charges arising from the circumstances surrounding Mr. Dziekanski's death in order to protect the integrity of the perjury prosecutions. Those details will be released upon completion of the perjury prosecutions.

Mr. Peck was appointed June 18, 2010 by Assistant Deputy Attorney General Robert W.G. Gillen, Q.C. to determine whether, in view of the evidence heard at the Braidwood Inquiry and the findings and recommendations of Commissioner Braidwood, it was appropriate to reassess the decision of the Criminal Justice Branch not to prosecute any of the officers involved in the incident. Mr. Peck was also to review other conduct of the officers in connection with the incident.

Mr. Peck's mandate included:

- Conducting an independent review of the Braidwood Commission report relating to the death of Robert Dziekanski. This review was to include the four officers' conduct in relation to the initial encounter with Robert Dziekanski, their participation in the subsequent investigation and their testimony at the Braidwood Inquiry, with a view to determining whether anything contained in the report called for a reassessment of the Branch decision not to prosecute the officers.

- Providing a written report to the Assistant Deputy Attorney General with the results of his review and the reasons for his decision.

- If in his view the initial charge assessment should be revisited given the findings made by Commissioner Braidwood in his report, proceeding to examine all materials relied on in the original charge assessment decision and any other materials he might deem appropriate including the evidence taken at the Braidwood Inquiry and exhibits or reports filed therein, and making whatever charge assessment decision he deemed appropriate in the independent exercise of his prosecutorial discretion.

- In addition, examining any other conduct of the four officers in relation to the matter, and in particular their statements to investigators and their testimony at the Braidwood Inquiry with a view to determining whether their conduct was at any time contrary to any provisions of the Criminal Code or applicable provincial legislation and making whatever charge assessment decision he deemed appropriate in the independent exercise of his prosecutorial discretion.

- If following his review, and any charge reassessment he might undertake, it was his view that a prosecution was warranted in connection with the conduct of the four officers in relation to their initial encounter with Mr. Dziekanski or their subsequent conduct in relation to this matter, to take conduct of the prosecution and any subsequent appeal.

On June 29, 2010 the Branch announced that Mr. Peck had recommended that the initial charge assessment should be revisited, citing among other reasons that the Braidwood Commission Report into the death referred to "factual material that was not available to the Branch at the time [of the initial charge assessment decision], including but not limited to expert video analysis and expert opinions relating to the reasonableness of the escalation and de-escalation of force."

No further information will be released or comment made by the Special Prosecutor or the Criminal Justice Branch at this time.



Read it on Global News: Mounties involved in Robert Dziekanski death face perjury charges


http://www.globalnews.ca/Mounties+in...491/story.html



What do you guys think?

Justice served or not.
Advertisement
Vale46Rossi is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-14-2011, 01:24 PM   #2
I subscribe to Revscene
 
DC5-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
Can this case die already gosh
Posted via RS Mobile
DC5-S is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-14-2011, 01:27 PM   #3
WHAT? NO FOOD?
 
Santofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,406
Thanked 1,134 Times in 231 Posts
Failed 158 Times in 54 Posts
I can't understand why BC takes forever to solve these cases.......
Is it just me or are they wasting money?

Last edited by Santofu; 05-14-2011 at 01:39 PM.
Santofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2011, 01:29 PM   #4
In RS I Trust
 
murd0c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mission
Posts: 20,778
Thanked 17,661 Times in 4,345 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
I want this case to end no questions asked but if we have to hear more about it so they get what they deserve I will be happy to read more about it. In this case it seems like justice will be served it will just take a while.

Mostly I can't stand the media how they harp on everything which drives me crazy but at least in this case it's proving in certain times if you don't let it go the media does some good.
murd0c is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net