jimi g
08-08-2014, 04:20 PM
So I'll make a long story short...
I was driving and turning into angled parking on a busy street when a road biker (bicycle) doing his best imitation of Lance Armstrong was weaving in and out of traffic.
When I checked, he wasn't there (because he was apparently behind another vehicle according to a witness) and then all of a sudden as I started to turn in, he was.
He yelled, I stopped (vehicle stationary now and not pulled in yet but angled). He tried to avoid my car, lost control due to his elevated speed and then struck the passenger side.
The force of the impact shattered his front rim, dented my passenger door and because he went over the hood there is damage on the front quarter panel as well.
Everyone was ok, we exchanged info, I got more information from a witness who's vehicle was also nearly struck by this reckless cyclist and whatever, everyone went on their way.
Did the report to ICBC thing, the cyclist also called in and admitted fault for the collision.
Ok so far so good right?
EXCEPT
Because he's a cyclist, I have to pay the deductible even though he was found 100% at fault.
WTF?
I was shocked... Is this really how it works?
My car is damaged through no fault of my own (admitted by the cyclist even) and I still have to pay the deductible?
I've never had an at fault collision. My one prior collision, the other driver admitted fault (because it was) and their insurance paid out my deductible so it cost me nothing.
I have all the insurance ICBC offers etc and max discount.... Seems wrong.
I was driving and turning into angled parking on a busy street when a road biker (bicycle) doing his best imitation of Lance Armstrong was weaving in and out of traffic.
When I checked, he wasn't there (because he was apparently behind another vehicle according to a witness) and then all of a sudden as I started to turn in, he was.
He yelled, I stopped (vehicle stationary now and not pulled in yet but angled). He tried to avoid my car, lost control due to his elevated speed and then struck the passenger side.
The force of the impact shattered his front rim, dented my passenger door and because he went over the hood there is damage on the front quarter panel as well.
Everyone was ok, we exchanged info, I got more information from a witness who's vehicle was also nearly struck by this reckless cyclist and whatever, everyone went on their way.
Did the report to ICBC thing, the cyclist also called in and admitted fault for the collision.
Ok so far so good right?
EXCEPT
Because he's a cyclist, I have to pay the deductible even though he was found 100% at fault.
WTF?
I was shocked... Is this really how it works?
My car is damaged through no fault of my own (admitted by the cyclist even) and I still have to pay the deductible?
I've never had an at fault collision. My one prior collision, the other driver admitted fault (because it was) and their insurance paid out my deductible so it cost me nothing.
I have all the insurance ICBC offers etc and max discount.... Seems wrong.