Simulated
05-01-2017, 05:27 PM
Help me understand this. I have a scenario on Victoria Drive in Vancouver where cyclists are just rolling through the pedestrian crosswalk along East 10th Ave with no regard for the stop sign that they should be obeying.
I am aware that cyclists have the option to roll through stop signs now like you would with yielding signs for cars. However if I understand correctly, since it is a yielding procedure, they can only roll through the intersection if there are no other cars driving along Victoria Drive.
I had two close calls this week where I am expecting to have the right-of-way going northbound on Victoria Drive since there is no stop sign for me in that direction. In both cases, the cyclists just popped out into the intersection and I had to come to an abrupt full stop just to let them through.
I'd like to know if I was in the wrong for assuming that I have the right-of-way or if those cyclists are just fucking stupid?
I am aware that cyclists have the option to roll through stop signs now like you would with yielding signs for cars. However if I understand correctly, since it is a yielding procedure, they can only roll through the intersection if there are no other cars driving along Victoria Drive.
I had two close calls this week where I am expecting to have the right-of-way going northbound on Victoria Drive since there is no stop sign for me in that direction. In both cases, the cyclists just popped out into the intersection and I had to come to an abrupt full stop just to let them through.
I'd like to know if I was in the wrong for assuming that I have the right-of-way or if those cyclists are just fucking stupid?