View Single Post
Old 04-22-2013, 02:02 PM   #7
Infiniti
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,577
Thanked 773 Times in 303 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 19 Posts
While this story is important in the context of domestic security, an interesting backdrop to this is the current bill being debated in Ottawa (C-17) which re-instates provisions from bill C-36 that expired under the "sunset clause". In general terms, C-17 would involve investigative hearings for individuals who may have information concerning a terrorism offence. Failure to attend and or answer questions at these hearings are grounds for self-incrimination. Another matter of contention is preventative arrest. Under these new rules, an individual can be arrested without warrant in order to prevent a terrorist attack. They must be presented to a judge within 24hrs or whenever feasible. Once presented, the judge can determine whether or not to release unconditionally or with conditions or held in further custody.
All in all these are sensitive issues relative to constitutional rights upon which Canadians are entitled to.
Infiniti is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: