REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-25-2009, 04:31 PM   #1
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Supercharger vs Turbocharger

Given the option between the two, which one do you prefer more? I'm partial toward the supercharger because I prefer the extra power throughout the full RPM range, not to mention that the sound of a twin-screw sounds sexy. I'm aware that a properly tuned snail can make more power, but having to wait for that power to kick in is a pain. lol

How about you guys and gals?
Advertisement
Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 04:42 PM   #2
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
you!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ur sistrs pants
Posts: 2,656
Thanked 606 Times in 105 Posts
really depends on what ur looking for here. both have their own pros/cons

sc will make good power but a turbo will make so much more despite having the same boost pressure
for me an sc doesn't give too much hassle to run as u dont need to worry about oil lines, boost issues, leaks, etc etc. u get no lag as well but the major prob with this setup is temp issues

turbo on the other hand will make more power but not until when it spools. its usually harder to tune than sc and there's a bigger risk for detonation

it all depends for me, if i were to do a lot of road racing then id pick the sc but if it was drag then id go turbo
you! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 05:15 PM   #3
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
GordonTse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,327
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
i personally like both, but like you mentioned, love the sound of a s/c. also the ricer in my loves the psshhh of a BOV. personally i've been deciding which one to go once warranty is out since there is finally a fully tunable unit out by Hondata.
__________________
'08 TW FA5
GordonTse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 05:33 PM   #4
Ricer Mod
 
Berzerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
4 banger superchargers are a waste of time and money IMO. They are easy to install though (Jackson Racing Kit comes to mind) and are a fun little boost in power if your not into really big gains. I for one like the whistle of a centrifugal charger (Vortec comes to mind) at idle and low rpm around town but a twin screw at WOT sounds badass as well.

If all your talking about though is power I gotta go with a turbo on 4 bangers and leave the chargers to the big boys that can spin them.

Berz out.
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
Berzerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 05:49 PM   #5
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,742
Thanked 179 Times in 76 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonTse View Post
i personally like both, but like you mentioned, love the sound of a s/c. also the ricer in my loves the psshhh of a BOV. personally i've been deciding which one to go once warranty is out since there is finally a fully tunable unit out by Hondata.
Uhm. S/C and turbo both use a BOV
CivicTypeRice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 06:03 PM   #6
RS Veteran
 
bcrdukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GTA
Posts: 29,019
Thanked 10,509 Times in 4,311 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicTypeRice View Post
Uhm. S/C and turbo both use a BOV
Umm...some cars with an AFM application use a BPV.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badhobz View Post
Yeah. Typical Mainlander Barbie doll.

Her car even smelled nice. Like a mixture of luxury perfume and a hint of….. vag ? Fish sauce ? Something a bit dank
bcrdukes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 08:24 PM   #7
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Leopold Stotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,044
Thanked 315 Times in 149 Posts
For my G? i want to SC, easier to install. and moreso along the lines of what i want, low-midrange oomph
__________________
1996 Honda Accord
1995 Nissan 240sx
2004 Infiniti G35
2005 Honda Jazz

BuySell Feedback
Quote:
"It's called Sex Panther by Odeon. It's illegal in nine countries... Yep, it's made with bits of real panther, so you know it's good ... They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time. "
Leopold Stotch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 09:20 PM   #8
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Philly74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: voncouver
Posts: 1,188
Thanked 32 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berzerker View Post
4 banger superchargers are a waste of time and money IMO. They are easy to install though (Jackson Racing Kit comes to mind) and are a fun little boost in power if your not into really big gains. I for one like the whistle of a centrifugal charger (Vortec comes to mind) at idle and low rpm around town but a twin screw at WOT sounds badass as well.

If all your talking about though is power I gotta go with a turbo on 4 bangers and leave the chargers to the big boys that can spin them.

Berz out.

SC helps the 4banger in low end torque. Not a waste at all IMO If you consider thats where the 4 banger lacks. SC is great to zip around town.
__________________
asian parents, "i want five cows for your son"

brown parents, "FIVE COWS?! HAVE YOU GONE COO KOO? five cows... noo to much... two cows."


Go WINGS GO 1997,1998,2002 & 2008

#2 #5 #13 #14 #16 #19 #30 #40 #91
Philly74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 09:47 PM   #9
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
BEEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bc
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 119 Times in 53 Posts
from a owner who own both a 2.0L turbo and a 1.8L supercharged car - I prefer a 2.0L turbo. A size 4 turbo 2.0L is fun and basically lag free (people might complaint that it's laggy before 3000 rpm, but it's only gonna take 1 second before you hit 3000 rpm, isn't it! The 1.8L supercharged is my daily driver and it's okay. Nothing exciting, but sometimes it's nice to have the low end torque. If I can choose, I'll pick the turbo.
BEEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 10:22 PM   #10
Media Officer / MOD
 
!Aznboi128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,073
Thanked 5,751 Times in 1,724 Posts
why not both?

Golf GT


slightly modded



http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2009/07...-14-liter.html
__________________
[NS]NiteShadow
my feedback (128-0-0)
Revscene Automotive Reviews
Quick link to personal reviews -> Website YouTube
Official Revscene Instagram Coordinator

Last edited by !Aznboi128; 07-25-2009 at 10:40 PM.
!Aznboi128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 10:36 PM   #11
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
jlenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 3,564
Thanked 330 Times in 163 Posts
^ werd!!

Twin-charged FTMFW!
__________________
Don't be the next RS.net statistic - If you drink, don't drive. You'll lose your licence, and the rest of us will laugh at you.
jlenko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 03:07 PM   #12
RS controls my life!
 
Muskys SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Langley
Posts: 799
Thanked 284 Times in 52 Posts
After working on a lot of supercharged and turbocharged applications, I'd have to say the turbocharger is far superior. If sized correctly lag can be minimal and a very flat boost curve can be achieved. For some applications however, a turbo system requires a lot of work and fabrication compared to supercharger.

A centrifugal syle supercharger such as vortech don't have a lot of low or midrange power because the boost increases with rpm. They basically have linear lag until full boost, but they make the most power at peak of all the superchargers. These work well on larger displacement engines that generate a lot of torque down low, but are pretty bad in smaller engines like hondas.

The roots type superchargers such as eaton are better at generating full boost at low rpm but sacrifice top end power.

The Screw type supercharger such as a Whipple charger is a balance between the 2
__________________
S14 240SX: 2JZ swap/w BorgWarner S366 Turbo/hks264's/Haltech E11 / 626rwhp and 523rwtq @24 psi
Shawn
Muskys SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 03:51 PM   #13
RS controls my life!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: van
Posts: 781
Thanked 324 Times in 104 Posts
roots supercharger whine is intoxicating..twin screw is alright...but roots deff my fav but i also like the turbo..doesn't sound AS good but when its spooling and bov its sexy as well
eurochevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 06:26 PM   #14
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
k20a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,054
Thanked 62 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicTypeRice View Post
Uhm. S/C and turbo both use a BOV
Do your research.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Berzerker View Post
4 banger superchargers are a waste of time and money IMO. They are easy to install though (Jackson Racing Kit comes to mind) and are a fun little boost in power if your not into really big gains. I for one like the whistle of a centrifugal charger (Vortec comes to mind) at idle and low rpm around town but a twin screw at WOT sounds badass as well.

If all your talking about though is power I gotta go with a turbo on 4 bangers and leave the chargers to the big boys that can spin them.

Berz out.
Well said, and I agree wif you or atleast most of it.

But trust me, once you go turbo, there's no going back.
You crave more power and more boost though. It's like a drug, no joke..
k20a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 09:50 PM   #15
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berzerker View Post
4 banger superchargers are a waste of time and money IMO. They are easy to install though (Jackson Racing Kit comes to mind) and are a fun little boost in power if your not into really big gains. I for one like the whistle of a centrifugal charger (Vortec comes to mind) at idle and low rpm around town but a twin screw at WOT sounds badass as well.

If all your talking about though is power I gotta go with a turbo on 4 bangers and leave the chargers to the big boys that can spin them.

Berz out.
Good post

I personally would only think to supercharging engines with 6cyl or more. I love the sound of a supercharged VQ35 or the inline 6 from a M3.
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 09:53 PM   #16
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
strap on 4 turbos
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 09:54 PM   #17
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu View Post
strap on 4 turbos
Too much Veyron for you. =P
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 11:33 PM   #18
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Jun_Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: burnaby
Posts: 655
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
you could always twin charge and be special. you just have to get the right combination
Jun_Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 09:05 AM   #19
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
SuperSlowSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 93 Times in 29 Posts
Really depends where you use it. On the road, supercharger. Or maybe a turbo with little lag. Like vw 2.0t.
On the track, where you keep the rpm high... turbo. Why? go drive a 997 turbo.
__________________
LClock 1.62b
pinkbaby(aka pinkbuggy): (_\._) :p
SuperSlowSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 09:58 AM   #20
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 390
Thanked 545 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicTypeRice View Post
Uhm. S/C and turbo both use a BOV
Quote:
Originally Posted by k20a View Post
Do your research.
He's right. You can buy a sync. BOV for comptech systems. You do your research.
vo_hantu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 11:59 AM   #21
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSlowSS View Post
Really depends where you use it. On the road, supercharger. Or maybe a turbo with little lag. Like vw 2.0t.
On the track, where you keep the rpm high... turbo. Why? go drive a 997 turbo.
OVERBOOST
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 02:49 PM   #22
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by k20a View Post
Do your research.


My S/C setup will be running a BOV...
Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 02:54 PM   #23
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
SC makes power thru out the entire power band


no lags, but roughly 100hp gain 80 pounds of torque gain on the easy low boost set up



as turbo can make greater power, and higher potential.


hence why u dont see any high hp cars 500hp + with a SC



Turbo will lag tho

never seen nor knew u can turbo plus SC at the same time

if so, why havent many people do this yet?
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 07:00 PM   #24
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
^more parts to fix?

But isn't the Golf GT one of the first like that?

how about one of those fancy variable turbos like the 997? Don't know what they are called lol
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 07:07 PM   #25
2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
It all comes down to volumetric efficiencies.

Everything in life have pros and cons..

The key is to measure, decide when in the power band you want the power and do the math,
godwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net