taken 2 8/10 , Liam just plays the baddest motherfucker in town so well lol

This is 40 7/10 , had some nice laughs

End of Watch 8/10 , love these type of movies anything gang related does it for me

this is 40 8/10 the ending was epic if you stay after during the credits. i didn't like the fact there were a few issues not resolved.

life of pi... dman it was good.. 9/10.... not too long not too short. did have to rethink of what happened at hte end. eerything was on a blue screen and the actor did a great job.

skyfall... really? ..7/10... not that epic.

Money Ball 8.75/10.

Taken 2: 3/10

It was like a really bad copy of "Taken"

^^totally agree, taken 1 so much more epic, but i wouldve given it a 5.5/10

savages... wtfffff it was so slow and jut wasn't exciting at all. had potential
6/10

taken 2: 3/10

The reason why taken 2 was so bad is because of the director. They should have just brought back Taken 1's director.

Taken 2's director is the same guy who directed columbiana.

i dont know why Luc Besson likes working with him, would prefer if Luc directed it instead but even the story wasn't good either (and Luc wrote it)

taken 2 was so half assed done.... its not nearly as grimey as the first one. it almost felt like they did it just so they did it.

in time
7/10
amazing concept, but i agree with poor delivery. I definitely still enjoyed the movie tho

So stoked for Taken 3






...NOT

looper 6.5/10 - watchable with cool concept
Django 8.5/10 - made me think about slavery more than i ever had.

Looking forward to this next weekend...

Zero Dark Thirty

watched it already :)



get ready to die with boredom, your ass will be in so much pain you'll feel like you're being tortured like those in the film


3/10 it's not a documentary... it's a movie... but it's filmed and portrayed like they want you to think its a documentary.. okay fine that's a style of film i guess... except nothing fucking happens through most of it.. it's as if you sat there for 10 years too through days of non events with a couple minutes of happenings and when something does happen it's weak like a rated G version of something that needs to be rated R... if you have to see it it should be at home so you can give yourself breaks

if you're in the cinema watching it don't feel bad taking bathroom breaks you won't miss a damned thing

is Django > Inglorious basterds ?

I'm seeing mixed reviews

Hobbit. 6.5/10. Great visuals. Overshadowed by LOTR trilogy. This shouldn't be a trilogy. 2 Part movie would have sufficed.

Just finished watching Django. I couldn't pick which one is better. All I know is that Christoph Waltz is awesome! His and Dicaprio's characters made the movie for me.

A lot of my friends, who watched this movie thought it was good. I did not like the storytelling and thought the 3-D was tacky. I felt a little uncomfortable watching this movie and just didn't like it.

FINALLY got a chance to watch this and funny enough I watched it with my gf.

it talks about a guy going to China; why men are into prostitutes and funny enough, 90% of their experiences are true. From the beginning to the end, i gotta say it's highly accurate. 一路向西

一路向西 9/10... a lot of boobies (at least in HK standards), the story and screen play was done beautifully.
PS: you gotta know a fair bit of chinese to understand (or have subtitles)

zero dark 30

6/10

they could have done a better job.

Jumper 6/10
SWAT 6/10
Posted via RS Mobile

Django 8/10 - Best Tarantino film for me. Dicaprio killed it. Less useless dialogue then Inglorious Basterds.

Zero Dark Thirty - 8/10

This is 40

6/10

The whole movie was just frustrating, from beginning to end. Maybe that's the feeling they were going for. I just wanted it to end every time someone got into a fight or screamed in that movie.

zero dark thirty 6/10
django 6.7/10

i was hoping i'd like these movies more!