Quote:
Originally Posted by Graeme S
(Post 8043373)
I didn't give an opinion either way--was just clarifying.
That having been said, I'm of two minds about this.
On one hand, do the damage, pay to fix it. On the other hand, you've just collected double for a single repair. using this same logic, a shady (or even just 'efficient') rental agency could collect damages from each person who rents the car over 3 years never fixing anything, then having the whole thing done at once and pocketing both the interest and the difference. Even if we get one person putting $150 worth of damage every 2 months, that's still $2700 over three years. And that's a lot more than a fresh respray from a place like Maaco (which honestly is all it would need to be sold as a mint car).
| i completely agree with you, but if the sleazeball place never fixed their dings and scrapes, chances are people would stop coming to rent their cars, so there is a business risk associated with that plan of action | 