| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n  |              |   |                    
			01-22-2009, 12:21 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#26  |     |      Banned (ABWS)  
				  Join Date: Dec 2008  Location: Banned  
					Posts: 330
				  
		
			
				Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	         |     
			
			i much rather get the s2k, my opinions are a bit biased because i used to drive a miata so i would choose the convertible 4 banger.
		     |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 12:34 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#27  |     |      Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!  
				  Join Date: Feb 2004  Location: vancouver  
					Posts: 841
				  
		
			
				Thanked 810 Times in 179 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 41 Times in 14 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			i find the 350z too heavy. at times, it feels underpowered. its not as agile as the s2k of course. thats a given. but its a quieter more civilized car.   
the s2k is a lighter more communicatve car in my opinion. i would like to think of it as what a miata should be from day one. its well balanced. but, the s2k is sometimes too well balanced for my liking and becomes hard to drive well.    
for a daily driver, they both arent very good. both 2 seaters with almost zero trunk space. parking is horrible with the 350z due to the small windows and high belt line. parking is equally bad with the s2k being that it has long front and low seating position. it gets worse when the top is up and when you happen to pick up an ap1 with no glass back with defog. both are quite loud on the highway. the s2k more so due to the high revs it needs. the 350z is quieter but i dont know about you but i hate how that v6 sounds. also, from memory, i think the 350z is more of a gas drinker.   
from a reliability point of view. i've myself have owned neither but i've heard more horror stories about the 350z than the s2k. seems like transmission and engine failure issues plague the earlier cars. but then again, i've read about s2k guys blowing up their rear ends, subframes, axles and such. it seems that s2k are overall cheaper to maintain though i could be wrong.   
as a toy, both aren't really that worthy of being an collector or purely a weekender like say a z06, elise or a 911. in my opinion, they are both fun cars at a good price for used but they arent special enough to get really attached to.   
for me, honestly i would pick neither if buying new. as for buying used, a nice E36 M3 would be a much better choice. If i really had to choose between the two. I would pick the S2k but only if it came with a hard top, cage and proper roll bars as some clubs in the states dont allow convertibles to run track days anymore.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 01:11 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#28  |     |      Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???  
				  Join Date: May 2007  Location: burnaby  
					Posts: 247
				  
		
			
				Thanked 60 Times in 15 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			Just go drive both and see which one you like.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 01:29 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#29  |     |      I subscribe to Revscene   
				  Join Date: Mar 2007  Location: Vancouver  
					Posts: 1,940
				  
		
			
				Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			id rather have the new 350z as it is way faster then a s2000. s2000 is only good with a blower.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 01:53 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#30  |     |      RabidMod   
				  Join Date: Aug 2003  Location: Toronto  
					Posts: 6,992
				  
		
			
				Thanked 2,243 Times in 842 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 118 Times in 36 Posts
			
		
	        |      Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  DC5-S     id rather have the new 350z as it is way faster then a s2000. s2000 is only good with a blower.   |       350z with blower is faster.  
350z win.
		     
				__________________  Geriatric Motoring Club Member #37  Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  EvoFire     I need to be reliably within 10-15mins of a baked pork chops rice with lemon tea.   |            |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 03:19 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#31  |     |      Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!   
				  Join Date: Aug 2008  Location: Richmond  
					Posts: 803
				  
		
			
				Thanked 997 Times in 121 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 165 Times in 29 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			To the OP    
Just buy whatever suits you better.  
Don't jump on the ban wagon my friend.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 03:08 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#32  |     |      I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!   
				  Join Date: Mar 2002  Location: ...  
					Posts: 20,300
				  
		
			
				Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
			
		
	        |    
			
			Here's a good comparison, S2000 vs 350Z.   http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=wSPL6eepv-A     |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 07:39 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#33  |     |      I don't get it   
				  Join Date: Feb 2003  Location: vancouver  
					Posts: 429
				  
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			I had an rsx, my bro had an s2k. My rsx-s was slower by far than the S2000...and I beat a G35 with the S2000.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 08:06 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#34  |     |      Banned (ABWS)  
				  Join Date: Aug 2008  Location: vancouver  
					Posts: 1,742
				  
		
			
				Thanked 179 Times in 76 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 189 Times in 70 Posts
			
		
	         |     
			
			somebody start an rsx-s vs civic si thread!
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 08:21 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#35  |     |      I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS  
				  Join Date: Oct 2005  Location: Vancouver  
					Posts: 530
				  
		
			
				Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 4 Times in 3 Posts
			
		
	        |      Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  Dolomite     I had an rsx, my bro had an s2k. My rsx-s was slower by far than the S2000...and I beat a G35 with the S2000.   |       My friend with a 996 MK1 C2 w/ exhaust lost to a G35 on Knight Bridge. 
My friend can't drive shit. 
So is the G35 you beat.  
G35 makes about 240whp and 1580kg (6.58kg/whp). 
S2000 makes about 190whp and 1300kg(6.82kg/whp). 
350Z makes about 250whp and 1450kg(5.8kg/whp). 
There is no way a G35 lost to S2000 on straight. 
Not to mention VQ35DE makes 100lb/ft torque more than S2000.   
Straight line performance: 350Z>G35>S2000
		     
				__________________ 
				2006 G35C 6MT Blk/Blk
			        
					
						Last edited by JackyJai; 01-22-2009 at 08:30 PM.
					
					
				    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 08:56 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#36  |     |      I don't get it   
				  Join Date: Feb 2003  Location: vancouver  
					Posts: 429
				  
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			Well....I beat him....twice. So yea. And yea he was trying. The s2k had I/E but I cant see that making any difference.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-22-2009, 09:14 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#37  |     |      I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS  
				  Join Date: Oct 2005  Location: Vancouver  
					Posts: 530
				  
		
			
				Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 4 Times in 3 Posts
			
		
	        |      Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  Dolomite     Well....I beat him....twice. So yea. And yea he was trying. The s2k had I/E but I cant see that making any difference.   |       The only reason is he still can't drive shit even he tried. 
The S2000 will achieve 0-60mph in 5.7 only if you drop the clutch at redline.  
The torque of S200 is not a lot for its weight. 
The VQ is a much more powerful engine.
		     
				__________________ 
				2006 G35C 6MT Blk/Blk
			        
					
						Last edited by JackyJai; 01-22-2009 at 09:20 PM.
					
					
				    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-23-2009, 03:03 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#38  |     |      RabidMod   
				  Join Date: Aug 2003  Location: Toronto  
					Posts: 6,992
				  
		
			
				Thanked 2,243 Times in 842 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 118 Times in 36 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			seriously guys, grow up and take your racing off the streets.
		    
				__________________  Geriatric Motoring Club Member #37  Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  EvoFire     I need to be reliably within 10-15mins of a baked pork chops rice with lemon tea.   |            |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-23-2009, 03:29 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#39  |     |      Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!   
				  Join Date: Aug 2008  Location: Richmond  
					Posts: 803
				  
		
			
				Thanked 997 Times in 121 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 165 Times in 29 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			they keep running the s2000 with the top down
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-23-2009, 07:58 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#40  |     |      Banned (BBM)  
				  Join Date: Jul 2004  Location: Vancouver  
					Posts: 16,142
				  
		
			
				Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
			
		
	        |      Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  Timpo       |        
this is another video that shows s2k and 350z's 1/4 mile is very similar. 0.1 second difference??   
those who mention that 350z has 100 more torque, 40-50whp more, even tho slightly heavier, with all those differences, than 350z should be a mile down the road if not a bus length. I dont see tat happenning
		     |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-23-2009, 12:03 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#41  |     |      I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie   
				  Join Date: May 2001  Location: Vancouver  
					Posts: 3,923
				  
		
			
				Thanked 304 Times in 155 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 116 Times in 29 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			The "not cross-shopped" statements are interesting.  They're both rear wheel drive sports cars in roughly comparable price categories.  Different?  Yes.   
If I was looking for a sports car right now then the driving experience and the entertainment  it provides would be very high on my list of criteria.  That is a major focus of both of these cars.  And if I could afford one then I could afford the other.  In that case they need to be compared in order to make an informed decision.  At least according to criteria that are important to me.   
In the end I suspect I would personally choose the Honda.  I have a bias against Nissan and my perception of their quality.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-23-2009, 12:35 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#42  |     |      I subscribe to Revscene   
				  Join Date: Mar 2007  Location: Vancouver  
					Posts: 1,940
				  
		
			
				Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
			
		
	        |      Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  amit87     somebody start an rsx-s vs civic si thread!   |       there is no k-pro for the si, thus your si fails
		     |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-23-2009, 12:46 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#43  |     |      Guest    |      Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  RabidRat     seriously guys, grow up and take your racing off the streets.   |       Completely agree.  Can't believe people are like "yah I totally beat him".  Go out to the track and prove it, not on the street.    
As for the two cars, I've driven a 350z and a S2000.  Both had mild mods - intake, exhaust.  Personally I think the 350Z is a better looking car, and the interior is very nice, EXCEPT, I found the driving / steering wheel position was pretty horrible.  There also wasn't a huge amount of communication between driver/car.   I drive a 1990 miata, so the S2000 should be right up my alley, but I was left somewhat unimpressed.  Rear visibility is atrocious, interior is also nice as well, but nothing went wow to me when I drove it.    
So I wouldn't buy either, but if I had to choose, it would be the 350Z, probably in convertible form (I drove the coupe).    
AND not to be an idiot because you didn't ask, but check out the Chrysler Crossfire.  You can get them for a steal, and they're actually nice cars.
		     |     | 
		
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-23-2009, 02:53 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#44  |     |      I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum   
				  Join Date: Nov 2006  Location: surrey  
					Posts: 2,526
				  
		
			
				Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 132 Times in 38 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			crossfire ? the market value will only keep going worst!!, plus it is made by chrysler.
		       |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			01-23-2009, 04:01 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#45  |     |      Guest    |      Quote:     
					Originally Posted by  wasabisashimi     crossfire ? the market value will only keep going worst!!, plus it is made by chrysler.   |       It's actually a rebadged Mercedes SLK.
		     |     | 
		
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			06-27-2009, 11:12 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#46  |     |      What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!  
				  Join Date: Jun 2009  Location: north vancouver  
					Posts: 199
				  
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 32 Times in 6 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			who buys a s2000 and go drag.....its 2 different types of car.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			06-27-2009, 11:27 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#47  |     |      Need to Seek Professional Help   
				  Join Date: May 2007  Location: Toilet  
					Posts: 1,081
				  
		
			
				Thanked 354 Times in 63 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 11 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	         |     
			
			you tell me.   
[youtube]c49McBCqFNM[/youtube]
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			06-27-2009, 11:27 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#48  |     |      Need to Seek Professional Help  
				  Join Date: Mar 2005  Location: vancouver  
					Posts: 1,095
				  
		
			
				Thanked 2,237 Times in 251 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 103 Times in 22 Posts
			
		
	        |     
			
			who brings up a 6month old post... its 2 old.
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                    
			06-27-2009, 11:58 AM
			
			  |  
			 
			#49  |     |      F**K YOUR HEAD   
				  Join Date: Apr 2009  Location: vancouver  
					Posts: 8,719
				  
		
			
				Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
			
		
	         |     
			
			exactly... right now 370 FTMFW!!!!
		       |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                   
			06-27-2009, 02:44 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#50  |     |      HELP ME PLS!!!   
				  Join Date: Sep 2008  Location: Burnaby  
					Posts: 5,541
				  
		
			
				Thanked 1,109 Times in 299 Posts
			
		
	  
		
			
				Failed 192 Times in 41 Posts
			
		
	         |     
			
			^I saw a black one the other day with black Volk Racing RE30s.....hella sexy!!!!
		    |       
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |       |                      |    |                        
		Posting Rules
	 |        You may not post new threads  You may not post replies  You may not post attachments  You may not edit your posts       HTML code is Off         |        |     |                  All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:33 AM.     |