REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Police Forum

Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2009, 08:15 PM   #1
Retired Traffic Cop
 
skidmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
Charter Argument for Ticket Dispute Delay

There was some recent case law on this:

http://www.drivesmartbc.ca/case-law/...w-r-v-drummond
Advertisement
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??

Learn more at DriveSmartBC
skidmark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 09:53 PM   #2
CRS
ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
 
CRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,957
Thanked 6,310 Times in 1,777 Posts
17 months.. hahaha I'll note that down.
__________________
Revscene Classifieds Moderator

My FeedBack 53-0-0
CRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 11:33 PM   #3
The "You'd Know" Moderator
 
impactX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 20,930
Thanked 274 Times in 139 Posts
LOL I wonder how many work/vacation days he used to save a mere $600 dollars. The again, who in the right mind would speed excessively while not wearing a seatbelt.
__________________
08 CBR600RR
03 IS300

Ezekiel 25:17. The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you.
impactX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 10:32 AM   #4
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: PR
Posts: 1,140
Thanked 253 Times in 131 Posts
Good read and good to know. Although, I have heard arguments on behalf of the crown coming from the JJP that ignorance of proper notification must be made to the courts that there will be a Charter challenge is not an excuse and that part of the accused's argument was dismissed.
__________________
"Never give a match up halfway through. Never say that you do not feel up to it, that your condition is bad, and throw in the towel. Fight to the very end, always looking for your chance to break through." - Kazuzo Kudo
sho_bc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 03:58 PM   #5
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: van
Posts: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Actually, I am looking into this right now after 13 months. You must show that the delay prejudiced your defense. Its not the time delay itself that is examined but the that the delay diminished your defense with no fault of yourself. This has been successful in as little as 8 months. Over a year is a strong case. Time is calculated from receipt of ticket to first court date. Any delay on your part is not counted.
03terminator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 04:03 PM   #6
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: PR
Posts: 1,140
Thanked 253 Times in 131 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03terminator View Post
Actually, I am looking into this right now after 13 months. You must show that the delay prejudiced your defense. Its not the time delay itself that is examined but the that the delay diminished your defense with no fault of yourself. This has been successful in as little as 8 months. Over a year is a strong case. Time is calculated from receipt of ticket to first court date. Any delay on your part is not counted.
Be sure to submit your Charter argument before the trial date if thats the route you're choosing. Like I mentioned, I have seen JJPs throw that argument out right away on people who come to court having not done anything about it prior to trial.
__________________
"Never give a match up halfway through. Never say that you do not feel up to it, that your condition is bad, and throw in the towel. Fight to the very end, always looking for your chance to break through." - Kazuzo Kudo
sho_bc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 04:10 PM   #7
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: van
Posts: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sho_bc View Post
Be sure to submit your Charter argument before the trial date if thats the route you're choosing. Like I mentioned, I have seen JJPs throw that argument out right away on people who come to court having not done anything about it prior to trial.
Yes, you are correct, you need to file 2 weeks prior to your court date. You can get a package at the Crown Council office at the courthouse on Robson. You need to show that the delay caused prejudice.
03terminator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net