REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   #RevsceneVLS General Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/revscenevls-general-chat_14/)
-   -   Help proof read orange7's assignment paper (https://www.revscene.net/forums/566912-help-proof-read-orange7s-assignment-paper.html)

orange7 03-05-2009 04:46 AM

Help proof read orange7's assignment paper
 
mod please delete.. orange7 has found his dog..

vancouveray 03-05-2009 09:53 AM

no thanks. =-)

Trinity 03-05-2009 10:01 AM

tl;dr

Trinity 03-05-2009 10:06 AM

Seriously though - I'm assuming your first paragraph is the intro? If so, it doesn't tell me what your argument is.

Gumby 03-05-2009 10:53 AM

What grade are you in? I'm sorry to say this, but it was very hard to read.

This is probably too late, but here goes...

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange7 (Post 6313630)
Jackson and Sleigh argue that “many people directly affected by the TGD will become worse off… and some may never recover socially or economically” (225) because the compensation to those who voluntary resettle is inadequate.

Voluntarily, not voluntary.

Quote:

However, if the government make better compensation, then crop growers should move into the urban area and give their children the opportunity to enrol in school.
I think "made" would be the proper tense.

And don't finish your paragraph with "aren't", a contraction. It sounds very informal.

orange7 03-05-2009 10:54 AM

^
good point

orange7 03-05-2009 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gumby (Post 6313987)
What grade are you in? I'm sorry to say this, but it was very hard to read.

This is probably too late, but here goes...



Voluntarily, not voluntary.


I think "made" would be the proper tense.

And don't finish your paragraph with "aren't", a contraction. It sounds very informal.


ya.. thanks.. i see those mistakes now..

wow.. i can't believe i made those errors..

Trinity 03-05-2009 12:56 PM

I agree with Gumby - hard to read. First sentence is unwieldy, there was a part that looked like you were citing something but you didn't have a source... Since you took it down, I can't critique it anymore.

orange7 03-05-2009 10:36 PM

haha.. ya.. there was a citation... but i didn't provide the source on rs cuz i didn't think it would be neccessary..

anyways.. thanks all..
i've handed in my hwk paper already...

too late to do anything about it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net