Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Resolution has nothing to do with exposure. |
Yeah you're right. But in my post, I wasnt referring to the resolution of the image itself. I'm referring to the resolution of the LCD.
Darthchilli's comment was about not being able to tell from his LCD whether he has a good image or a bad image. I assumed he meant the LCD on the XTi was not good. What I'm saying is that even with a higher quality/higher resolution "LCD" like the one on the D90, you can never really trust how your image looks on the LCD and it isn't always accurate to use the LCD to guage whether you have a good shot or a bad shot.
Im still a noob, but when he's saying good or bad shot, i automatically think proper/improper exposure - and proper exposure "usually" means a good shot (unless of course you're trying to do something more creative and are intentionally over/under exposing) Either way though, whether you're looking at a good shot thats properly exposed, or a good shot that is creatively meant to be improperly exposed, the histogram is always going to be the key...
if I'm wrong to assume that good shot = proper exposure and bad shot = improper exposure (unless intentionally done), let me know

..I'm here to learn

I know many of you are much more experienced in this art than I.