REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   Fedex plane crash (jpn news) (https://www.revscene.net/forums/569230-fedex-plane-crash-jpn-news.html)

Vansterdam 03-23-2009 01:39 AM

holy shit that video was intense dude! RIP

orange7 03-23-2009 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 6342841)
I'm trying not to be mean, but what the fuck did you think they used?

they used horses and walking power

6insomnia9 03-23-2009 01:55 AM

RIP.
Omg my package.

ghosty 03-23-2009 10:42 AM

if it happend on the water, it would have been cast away

PHRiSCo 03-23-2009 11:22 AM

WWWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLSSSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNN!!!

monkeywrench 03-23-2009 01:00 PM

Shocking to see..

Sooner or later, aircraft crashes will increase to 1 accident per day around the world

Rich Sandor 03-23-2009 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RX7CER (Post 6343724)

Sooner or later, aircraft crashes will increase to 1 accident per day around the world

Um, care to explain the logic behind that statement?

Raid3n 03-23-2009 01:31 PM

^logic doesn't exist here! this is revscene!

Gumby 03-23-2009 01:36 PM

Wow scary video to watch, and thanks for the explanations. Sounds like the MD-11 isn't the greatest plane to fly...

q0192837465 03-23-2009 02:17 PM

wow, that sux. Hope the pilots died a quick death. RIP tho

you 03-23-2009 02:17 PM

now thats what i call a burnout
rip

Rich Sandor 03-23-2009 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gumby (Post 6343762)
Sounds like the MD-11 isn't the greatest plane to fly...

I think it's not harder to fly than anything else, it just has some unique characteristics due to that big engine on the tail. Every plane has it's quirks and that's why each big plane you fly, you have to be checked-out on and proficient on that plane specifically. (You can't just go fly any airliner once you have an "airline transport pilot's licence") Once you're trained on a plane, everything is just operating procedure, and any inherrent quirks are just something you know about and deal with as per the operating procedures.

metal 03-23-2009 05:19 PM

More pics
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/...rqaV9/340x.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/...TQ6Be/610x.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/...Ff4u1/340x.jpg

Mugen EvOlutioN 03-23-2009 05:58 PM

I hope my Advan RZ isnt on that plane after 4 months wait


damn it

!Aznboi128 03-23-2009 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingDeeCee (Post 6342697)
When did Fedex have planes o.O


yup cause to send things from overseas it goes on a boat! :thumbsup:

LemonH2O 03-23-2009 06:33 PM

the plane looked like a toy being tossed around

no_mercy 03-23-2009 07:48 PM

i have heard it was pretty gusty that day but there was a pilot saying it's not that unusual approaching tokyo with that kind of conditions


that being said...my question is why did the aircraft land so hard which caused it to porpoise... and why did let the aircraft sink instead of raising the nose up after the first bounce? a malfunctions caused by the initial bounce? i'm very curious


also, it looked like the wind may have picked up the right wing. it's not surprising because aircrafts on approach and landing have a "low energy state"


we'll see what the ntsb has to say if they are taking part...

metal 03-23-2009 08:40 PM

Did you read my quoted post on the first page?...

monkeywrench 03-23-2009 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Sandor (Post 6343748)
Um, care to explain the logic behind that statement?

I heard about it at a PAMEA meeting about a month ago, about statistics from around the world, not including major airliners, so small private jets and even private owned aircraft

Rich Sandor 03-24-2009 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no_mercy (Post 6344354)
my question is why did the aircraft land so hard which caused it to porpoise... and why did let the aircraft sink instead of raising the nose up after the first bounce? a malfunctions caused by the initial bounce? i'm very curious..


Windshear means "wind changing direction & intensity very suddenly"

If you have a 47knots headwind, and you are in the flare, about to touch down, then all of a sudden, the 47 knot headwind veers to a 47 knot tailwind, you'd suddenly lost 94knots of airspeed.

If your approach speed is 155knots, with an added 20knots for headwind, you'll be flying 175knots. Your stall speed is 80knots.

So you're doing 175knots, and all of a sudden the wind veers 180degrees and you loose 94knots of headwind, now your airspeed is suddenly RIGHT AT STALL SPEED.

What do you think is going to happen?

PLANE FALL DOWN GO CRASH.

It's actually pretty simple.

The nose being down in the video is all part of what happens after a plane stalls. Either the nose drops after the stall, or the pilot pushes the nose down in order to recover from the stall. Either way, the plane stalled, or was about to stall, just before touchdown, hence the nose down pitch. In that situation, pulling the nose up would be either impossible, OR, it would result in a straight down vertical drop which would more dangerous than hitting in a slightly nose down attitude but with a forward motion.

Rich Sandor 03-24-2009 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RX7CER (Post 6344696)
I heard about it at a PAMEA meeting about a month ago, about statistics from around the world, not including major airliners, so small private jets and even private owned aircraft

Airline safety gets better every day. There is SO MUCH emphasis on safety, that it can literally take all the fun out of flying.

When I started flying 12 years ago, compared to today, there have been many improvements made by transport canada and the airline industry in regards to safety. SMS being just one of the most recent initiatives, the other being awareness of smaller bush airlines operating on a budget, etc etc.

My point is that the percentage of crashes compared to flights is going down. If there are more flights, there will be more crashes. BUT, overall, safety is getting better and better.

I don't like reading "fear mongering" comments unless there is absolute truth to it.

keitaro 03-24-2009 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by metal (Post 6343074)
^What do altimeters have to do with either of those crashes?

Quoted from another forum I frequent:

i mean the recent B737-800 crash

the B737-800 that crashed recently had a faulty rad alt. Which is what probably(initial reports from NTSB) casued the crash.



another theory could be a microburst, which caused the sudden nose down.

Rich Sandor 03-24-2009 12:39 AM

A microburst would actually push the nose up while pushing the entire plane down at the same time.

Remember the tail is a huge flat surface whereas the nose is streamlined. Make a tiny paper airplane that looks like an airliner, balance it on your finger, and blow down on it. The tail will go down and the nose will pitch up.

Teriyaki 03-24-2009 11:13 AM

Just being through that very same airport 3 months ago, it really could have happened to a passenger jet, killing hundreds of passengers. RIP pilots.

Rogue951 03-24-2009 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aznboi128 (Post 6344216)
yup cause to send things from overseas it goes on a boat! :thumbsup:


and they do overnight too!!!
damn that's one fast boat!!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net