REVscene Automotive Forum
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   2009 Tramontana R (https://www.revscene.net/forums/575971-2009-tramontana-r.html)

hal0g0dv2 05-16-2009 12:15 PM
2009 Tramontana R
 
Priced at $520375, the 2009 Tramontana R is powered by a twin-turbocharged 5.5L V12 engine that generates 720hp and 811lb-ft of torque, rocketing the car from 0-60mph in just 3.6-seconds
The TRAMONTANA team has reduced the weight of the car to 92 kg. (203 lbs) despite the fact that the first version had already been done with the lightest materials. Remind that the chassis and the bodywork are completely made in carbon fiber

http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/8642/26346450xt4.jpg
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/3416/26349450xt7.jpg
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/9472/26354450xt12.jpg

J____ 05-16-2009 12:20 PM
weight of car to 203 LBS??? wtf. with a 720hp v12 and 203lbs, it'd better get better than 3.6 secs

Timpo 05-16-2009 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J____ (Post 6425687)
weight of car to 203 LBS??? wtf. with a 720hp v12 and 203lbs, it'd better get better than 3.6 secs
The F1 cars take 0-60mph in almost/around 4 seconds, they're too light and it doesn't go that fast until the downforce comes in effect.

Timpo 05-16-2009 12:26 PM
look at this website, i know it's in japanese but click on the "go" button and see the difference between NSX and F1.

The F1 machines can't really go fast until they get some downforce.

http://www.honda.co.jp/F1/spcontents...1catalogue/03/

Leopold Stotch 05-16-2009 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J____ (Post 6425687)
weight of car to 203 LBS??? wtf. with a 720hp v12 and 203lbs, it'd better get better than 3.6 secs
i think they wrote that wrong

i think it meant that it reduced the weight 92kgs, because the engine alone prob weighs upwards of 300lbs it's a V12

J____ 05-16-2009 04:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cakeTech (Post 6425908)
i think they wrote that wrong

i think it meant that it reduced the weight 92kgs, because the engine alone prob weighs upwards of 300lbs it's a V12
engine prolly weighs close to 600lbs for a v12. but still 200lbs for a rolling chassis is still damn light. full car is 800lbs? very light for that much hp a motorcycle weighs what, 400lbs?

Lomac 05-16-2009 04:56 PM
Quote:
The wheelbase has been shortened by 50mm to improve handling and aerodynamics, and weight is down by 202 pounds to just 2,777 pounds. The R stretches 192 inches from nose to tail, is 82 inches wide and 51 inches tall, and weight distribution is a perfect 50:50 left to right and 42:58 front to rear
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/24/r...-tramontana-r/

hk20000 05-16-2009 05:34 PM
Timpost fail.

shenmecar 05-16-2009 11:38 PM
a V12 in a go kart. wow

ilvtofu 05-16-2009 11:46 PM
The styling of this thing is pretty god awful, how come no one mentioned that...? and for 520K? (i would assume US dollars)... I thought it was something in ariel atom price range

impactX 05-17-2009 12:20 AM
Because it looks awesome for a racecar.

orange7 05-17-2009 02:16 AM
wow.. the gtr is faster than this in a 0-60 run...

impactX 05-17-2009 02:23 AM
No one cares about 0-60 on a supercar.

Nightwalker 05-17-2009 07:59 AM
Wow I fucking love it from the front

trollguy 05-17-2009 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange7 (Post 6426393)
wow.. the gtr is faster than this in a 0-60 run...


THE GTR IS SO AWESOME

aint it.

spenny 05-17-2009 11:24 AM
batmobile?

Blue92 05-17-2009 02:46 PM
lol @ F1 cars taking 4 seconds 0-60...maybe in 1950....these days its more like 2 seconds (though it heavily depends on gearing & tyres)

anti-vip 05-17-2009 02:49 PM
im heavier than the car...

Timpo 05-17-2009 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000 (Post 6425968)
Timpost fail.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture.../PWNED1111.jpg

Manic! 05-17-2009 08:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by g_i_g_g_i_t_y (Post 6426719)
im heavier than the car...
Wow your over 2,777 pounds?

You should be in Guinness or something.

Death2Theft 05-17-2009 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by halogodv2 (Post 6425684)
Priced at $520375, the 2009 Tramontana R is powered by a twin-turbocharged 5.5L V12 engine that generates 720hp and 811lb-ft of torque, rocketing the car from 0-60mph in just 3.6-seconds
The TRAMONTANA team has reduced the weight of the car to 92 kg. (203 lbs) despite the fact that the first version had already been done with the lightest materials. Remind that the chassis and the bodywork are completely made in carbon fiber
:haha:

Ludepower 05-17-2009 10:31 PM
I like the seat layout...ugly ass car though

Timpo 05-18-2009 05:52 PM
for more than 1/2 million $, id rather have something else

BNR32_Coupe 05-18-2009 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange7 (Post 6426393)
wow.. the gtr is faster than this in a 0-60 run...
but nissan cheated that too. they had slicks on, some mods under the hood...

you 05-19-2009 02:57 PM
badass


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:25 AM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net