REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   4runner/pathfinder which would you choose? (https://www.revscene.net/forums/588083-4runner-pathfinder-would-you-choose.html)

!Aznboi128 09-03-2009 07:00 PM

4runner/pathfinder which would you choose?
 
I'm looking for a used pathfinder 96+ or 4runner 92+

just going to be used for a winter vehicle so don't need anything too fancy.
Want to spend about 0-5000 so cheap, prob going to sell it after (march-april of next year)

so which would you choose and why?

I currently have a 6th gen accord right now... it's pretty low to get over the snow so a 4x4 is the best choice :)

Mugen EvOlutioN 09-03-2009 07:05 PM

90s model

4 runner > path


01 and up i believe path > 4 runner


the 01 + plus model 3.5L 240hp with 2xx torque is very powerful


as for 4 runners, pretty gutless compare to path

ilvtofu 09-03-2009 07:08 PM

^agreed, a lot of the 4 runners of that era i see though are covered in rust, seems like pathfinders usually in better condition,

How about a landcruiser?
(real mans jap suv :P)
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/va...336965635.html

Or an older one
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/rd...353586524.html
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/pm...326474896.html
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/va...322331798.html

Mugen EvOlutioN 09-03-2009 07:10 PM

landcruiser


the turbo diesel???



i believe for 90s model

4runner's price usually is higher than path

after 2001
path > 4 runner present

!Aznboi128 09-03-2009 07:39 PM

I checked craigs and buy/sell i dont wanna spend a lot so 91+ trucks are out

I was looking at the 93 4runners and they seem to rust everywhere especially over the rear wheels

anyone know of a 4x4 forum that would have more info

jack_dangerous 09-03-2009 08:18 PM

yota all the way... i own a 91 4runner sr5 v6 auto, super reliable, goes through everything you throw at it.. i beat the crap out of mine wheeling it and running over stuff, hasn't let me down

www.yotatech.com

Nightwalker 09-03-2009 08:26 PM

4runner

Mugen EvOlutioN 09-03-2009 08:52 PM

4 runner 4 life

fliptuner 09-03-2009 08:56 PM

The frame design on Pathfinders is really bad for not draining water. It's not uncommon for them to rust from the inside-out. Most people don't go through the trouble of rinsing out their frames yearly to clear out road debris, so they just become moisture traps.

The 3.0 litre models (pre 95) are also notorious for breaking exhaust studs. They're a pain in the ass to get to and replace.

4cyl 4Runners are gutless but bulletproof.

wacko604 09-03-2009 09:10 PM

4runner is more reliable

gramser57 09-03-2009 09:12 PM

have you considered a Jeep YJ or TJ if you want to spend a little more
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/va...351748233.html

BrendanS 09-03-2009 10:16 PM

Get an R50 Pathfinder (96+). They made the new fronts after 99.5, the 96-99 have an uglier front end imo. Check out NPORA for pathfinder information. lol I read up a lot on Pathies cause I was gunna get my uncles and lift it and all...don't think it's happening lol

!Aznboi128 09-03-2009 10:43 PM

SlideStaRR, I really don't want a Jeep.... they're great off road jeeps but all i need is a on road suv for the snow ... better then a low accord basicly

and Brendan, your the ONLY one that says pathfinder, I was looking for 96-98 just because they are MUCH cheaper to get 99.5 (with the newer 4wd system and the vq35) is expensive 10k +.

I'm leaning towards a 4runner 92-95 sr5 v6.... really don't want the gutless 4 banger but everyone says that 22r-e is ridiculously maintenance free

fliptuner 09-03-2009 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aznboi128 (Post 6577071)
SlideStaRR, I really don't want a Jeep.... they're great off road jeeps but all i need is a on road suv for the snow ... better then a low accord basicly

and Brendan, your the ONLY one that says pathfinder, I was looking for 96-98 just because they are MUCH cheaper to get 99.5 (with the newer 4wd system and the vq35) is expensive 10k +.

I'm leaning towards a 4runner 92-95 sr5 v6.... really don't want the gutless 4 banger but everyone says that 22r-e is ridiculously maintenance free

If you find a V6 in those years, make sure the headgasket issue has been resolved. Factory recall to replace them on those years.

BrendanS 09-03-2009 10:49 PM

yeah the 99.5+ are a bit more. If you're just buying a winter beater then a 99.5 might not be the best bet. You can't go wrong with any though

Timpo 09-03-2009 10:50 PM

4runner

BrendanS 09-03-2009 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timpo (Post 6577097)
4runner

where are the bodykit pics?

!Aznboi128 09-03-2009 11:28 PM

^ lol

headgasket eh will do thanks!

dinamix 09-03-2009 11:40 PM

dont waste your money on those cars..they are gas guzzlers and you'll have trouble getting your money back if your thinking of selling..
just get really good snow tires for your accord..i,ve use a set of nokian tires and they handled so much better than some 4 wheels drive cars i've driven..
most main roads are plowed down pretty good in the city so ground clearance shouldnt be too much of an issue for you..my 2 cents

too_slow 09-04-2009 08:03 AM

4cylinder 4Runner -> get a 4cylinder with the 2.7 engine (2.4 has head problems?)

Pathfinders -> do not buy a 1999.5+ They started using more aluminum components on the suspension, and they're prone to fail.. The backseats are surprisingly cramped as well..

Those who are are suggesting LC's.. Try finding one that's under $15k..

How about 1997-1999 Subaru Legacy Outbacks?

!Aznboi128 09-04-2009 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinamix (Post 6577166)
dont waste your money on those cars..they are gas guzzlers and you'll have trouble getting your money back if your thinking of selling..
just get really good snow tires for your accord..i,ve use a set of nokian tires and they handled so much better than some 4 wheels drive cars i've driven..
most main roads are plowed down pretty good in the city so ground clearance shouldnt be too much of an issue for you..my 2 cents

um... I assume you don't know how low my accord is... my front lip at the lowest point has 1.5" ground clearance, I got good snow tires last year and it was horrible had to run with out a front bumper for a bit


Quote:

Originally Posted by too_slow (Post 6577470)
4cylinder 4Runner -> get a 4cylinder with the 2.7 engine (2.4 has head problems?)

Pathfinders -> do not buy a 1999.5+ They started using more aluminum components on the suspension, and they're prone to fail.. The backseats are surprisingly cramped as well..

Those who are are suggesting LC's.. Try finding one that's under $15k..

How about 1997-1999 Subaru Legacy Outbacks?

a 2.7 4 cylinder? that's the 3rd gen I don't want to pay so much, as for legacy I did but how's the reliability for those?

sonick 09-04-2009 08:45 AM

+1 on 1996-1999.5 Pathfinders

Tegra_Devil 09-04-2009 08:51 AM

http://www.revscene.net/forums/fs-ft-1991-t586379.html

OMGZ!!!! this looks amazing, i bet the seller is super goodlooking too!! :)

ilvtofu 09-04-2009 08:52 AM

^It does but it's JDM yo!
that and it's probably in too good a condition for a beater

jack_dangerous 09-04-2009 08:53 AM

4runners have suprisingly good resale values....pretty much all toyota trucks do


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net