![]() |
Doctors make recommendations to ease seniors off the road Quote:
|
ive always said old people shouldn't be allowed do drive, past 70-75 there licences should be taken away. |
i've been thinking since i got my license that people over 65 should be retested ever 2-3 years to make sure they can still drive. |
Reminds me of South Park.. |
these 2 doctors are my heroes |
Quote:
|
Good stuff take their licenses away or retest them if they still want to drive Posted via RS Mobile |
excellent news |
its about fucken time |
Everyone thinks it's a good idea till they turn 65 themselves and their license is taken away. I'm all for getting more checkups when your older though to make sure they are still ok to drive...otherwise middleaged Chinese women should be stripped of their licenses as well...same logic, they can't drive right Posted via RS Mobile |
This sounds like a awesome idea now when we are young, but when we reach that age, we have to prepare to have our freedom taken away. But I am all for retesting! |
I'm all for taking a test annually/bi-annually, not only does it endanger others, it would also endanger ME AND MY grand kids (when I take them out). If you are not fit to do something, you are not fit, there is nothing to whine about. |
While I agree with getting seniors off the road, this idea will never fly. It's age discrimination. They should just implement re-testing people every 5 - 10 years. |
I think people are a little harsh on that front. My mom is 64 and I would hate to see her have to retest for a drivers license at 65. I'm happy to re-examine that thinking at 75ish. Are older drivers really causing that many accidents? |
i wonder if we'll still be saying the same thing when we're all older |
Quote:
But then again so are most incompetent vancouver drivers. |
I think we've all been waiting for this kind of news for a while! :) |
take them off the road, along with those incompetent c-lais |
while i think it's an idea, it will never fly and plus with our public transportation system Good fucking luck. If this was in HKG, or somewhere with an amazing public transportation system. I'd say we make the testing and withholding license work. Communities out in the boonies? Interiors? It will never fly and nor should it. Once you put limitation on people, it's no democracy anymore. Testing however, for things like eye sight and muscle disorders and not allowing them to drive. Totally agreement. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
mandatory testing for everyone every 5 years. i see no negative in this. no discrimination, generates revenue, changes in traffic laws can be implemented more quickly, can be used to weed out those who are unfit to drive, keep everyone's skills in check |
^ only problem with this is that I find the tests aren't examining the proper things. So it wouldn't matter how often tests there are. People are taught to drive slow, not better. It's a misconception of slow being safe. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net