You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Photography LabTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...
Amazing as it is, that is kinda detrimental to the art of photography though, IMHO. Photographers are going to get even more lazy...the copyright for one's image won't just belong to him/her, but to Adobe software engineers too!
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Looking forward to this though, that's for sure. I have SO many pictures that will look a LOT better once I can go through them in CS5
Sure it can 'improve' your photos, but will it still be *YOUR* photo if one uses the tool to the extent as it was used in the video? I mean, if you do all that manually (taking hours upon hours) in Photoshop, I can see the photographer retaining copyright, but this is so automated, that the photographer's hand in the final image is diminished. How can one morally and ethically say, "Yeah, that was all me."? In large commercial shoots where a professional creative retouching studio is used, they also get credit for the final image. Now....?
I can see this is potentially going to be a heated topic tomorrow amongst our professional clientele at Beau.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Amazing as it is, that is kinda detrimental to the art of photography though, IMHO. Photographers are going to get even more lazy...the copyright for one's image won't just belong to him/her, but to Adobe software engineers too!
I see what you're saying but people said the same things about music when digitizers synthesizers became popular. Or when electronic devices and dual clutch systems came to racing.
It's just the next evolution of photography. CS5 won't replace anyone with true talent, that's for sure.
I see what you're saying but people said the same things about music when digitizers synthesizers became popular. Or when electronic devices and dual clutch systems came to racing.
It's just the next evolution of photography. CS5 won't replace anyone with true talent, that's for sure.
No, totally different, IMHO. A Roland RK-500 or E-80 can't write music for you. You can't program in half of Beethoven's 9th and ask it to extrapolate the rest of the music.
Digital photography should be banned - we should all be shooting transparencies & B&W negs.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
woooow, makes removing power lines/electric poles a lot easier.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane
I had some girl come into the busser station the other day trying to make out with every staff member and then pull down her pants and asked for someone to stick a dick in her (at least she shaved).
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic
Vtec doesn't kick in on Reverse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma
its like.. oh yeah oh yeah.. ohhhh yeah... OOoooOohh... why's it suddenly feel a bit better... ohhhh yeahh... ohhh...oh..fuck... it probably ripped.
No, totally different, IMHO. A Roland RK-500 or E-80 can't write music for you. You can't program in half of Beethoven's 9th and ask it to extrapolate the rest of the music.
Digital photography should be banned - we should all be shooting transparencies & B&W negs.
i think its amazing but i agree with what you're saying.
digital photography is too 'perfect'. i like the imperfections and challenges in film photography. makes for more interesting photos. everything looks too calculated and perfect nowadays with digital.
as long as there's a way to tell what's fabricated and what's not, i don't think it's a big deal. However, major customers just care about the end result. whether that's disgracing or whatever is open to debate. it's almost like technology is catching up to a point where it threatens a type of skill or art form.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
