Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |  | |
04-02-2010, 04:47 AM
|
#1 | Hacked RS to become a mod
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 54,207
Thanked 25,180 Times in 8,782 Posts
Failed 1,554 Times in 702 Posts
| 3D Movies
Does anyone else think this is a stupid fucking trend, and we'll be laughing about it in 3 years? Even funnier is that they are trying to push it on home viewers too... This is sure to be on several "failures of the 2010 decade" lists...
I think it's cool for goofy theme rides and whacky Imax shows, but for movies it is just stupid. It's not even 3D, it's more like one of these
Those were fun when I was 5, but it's just stupid in normal movies.
I just saw Alice in Wonderland, and thought pretty much the same as everyone else.. Cool visuals, stupid action at the end, etc. But the 3D really made it less enjoyable for me. Especially the fast-moving parts, which the 3D couldn't keep up with. This made all fast-moving object blurry. Also gave my wife a headache for the rest of the day.
3D Movies = FAIL
|
| |
04-02-2010, 05:03 AM
|
#2 | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,540
Thanked 980 Times in 166 Posts
Failed 399 Times in 67 Posts
| |
| |
04-02-2010, 06:41 AM
|
#3 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,360
Thanked 659 Times in 201 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 31 Posts
|
I watched my very first 3D movie - avatar a couple of months ago. It was amazing. Then I watched alice in wonderland in 3D. Effect for the latter was horrid. The blurs was very distracting.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by JSALES While driving yesterday I saw a banana peel in the road and instinctively swerved to avoid it...thanks Mario Kart. | |
| |
04-02-2010, 07:13 AM
|
#4 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,185
Thanked 1,379 Times in 578 Posts
Failed 96 Times in 53 Posts
|
i think you problem is not with 3d movie its with alice in wonderland.
Avatar til now is by far the best use of the 3d technology because the whole movie was built with 3d in mind. If only more movie maker take 3d seriously and treat it as a technology not a gimmick it would really take movie to a whole other level.
|
| |
04-02-2010, 07:14 AM
|
#5 | Official Texas Ambassador
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 10,333
Thanked 5,671 Times in 1,324 Posts
Failed 416 Times in 132 Posts
|
I agree and want to add another trend that'll make people look stupid in three years:
3D Television.
Name one television network broadcasting in 3D. Name one movie that is coming that'll need a 3D TV to play?
None.
Samsung (the ones "ahead of the curve" and making 3D tvs right now) are making chumps out of a lot of trend followers.
|
| |
04-02-2010, 07:18 AM
|
#6 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,185
Thanked 1,379 Times in 578 Posts
Failed 96 Times in 53 Posts
|
^^ its not stupid because the porn industry havn't pick it up yet. wait till you can see jizz flying at yall in 3d right in you living room |
| |
04-02-2010, 07:49 AM
|
#7 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,360
Thanked 659 Times in 201 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 31 Posts
|
^^ And video game industry. Hopefully the 3D tv will be like blueray - slow start but picks up.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by JSALES While driving yesterday I saw a banana peel in the road and instinctively swerved to avoid it...thanks Mario Kart. | |
| |
04-02-2010, 08:39 AM
|
#8 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 526
Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 3 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by threezero ^^ its not stupid because the porn industry havn't pick it up yet. wait till you can see jizz flying at yall in 3d right in you living room  | actually porn industry picked up on it already cuz buddy has a few in 3d and they are awesome hahaha    |
| |
04-02-2010, 08:52 AM
|
#9 | Trollollolloing RS sine 2005
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 7,093
Thanked 2,471 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 473 Times in 132 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by El Bastardo I agree and want to add another trend that'll make people look stupid in three years:
3D Television.
Name one television network broadcasting in 3D. Name one movie that is coming that'll need a 3D TV to play?
None.
Samsung (the ones "ahead of the curve" and making 3D tvs right now) are making chumps out of a lot of trend followers. | apparently the world cup is broadcast in 3D by TSN i think.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane I had some girl come into the busser station the other day trying to make out with every staff member and then pull down her pants and asked for someone to stick a dick in her (at least she shaved). | Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic Vtec doesn't kick in on Reverse. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma its like.. oh yeah oh yeah.. ohhhh yeah... OOoooOohh... why's it suddenly feel a bit better... ohhhh yeahh... ohhh...oh..fuck... it probably ripped. | |
| |
04-02-2010, 08:58 AM
|
#10 | I don't get it
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 429
Thanked 162 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
i love the concept of 3d movies, it adds a whole new element that i much enjoy. They recently broadcasted a Man U vs Arsenal game in 3d, i wish i could of experienced that.
If you don't like 3d skinnypup, don't watch it, you can still watch it in the original form. You can think it's stupid all you want, no one is forcing it down your throat. For those that enjoy it, we'll pay extra, simple as that
|
| |
04-02-2010, 09:18 AM
|
#11 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 38,735
Thanked 15,644 Times in 6,321 Posts
Failed 2,133 Times in 727 Posts
|
like ive said before, during the olympics i tried all three of panasonics setups at their pavailion
all 3 were completely underwhelming and looked less 3D than any new 240hz setup ive seen with non-3d BR's
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
04-02-2010, 09:47 AM
|
#12 | SFICC-03*
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: richmond
Posts: 8,748
Thanked 3,357 Times in 1,316 Posts
Failed 162 Times in 84 Posts
|
im kind of undecided on it.
when i saw avatar i didnt like the 3d part.
i found it distracting.
then i saw alice, and it was slightly easier as i was used to the 3d effect after seeing avatar.
i dont hate or love it... prob need to see a few more 3d movies first.
|
| |
04-02-2010, 09:53 AM
|
#13 | Ask me about how I answered the question "How fat is TOO fat?"
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,139
Thanked 4,146 Times in 1,143 Posts
Failed 1,392 Times in 247 Posts
|
you're married? LoL
I think it depends on the movie for 3d,
I agree that 3d in Alice in wonderland was unnecessary but I think it will be more than suitable in Tron 2. Again, depends on the type of movie. As for 3d tv's, I think its just a waste of money.
__________________
I'm so stance my roof rack got a roof rack
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ Current
e92 335i 6MT RB Twos Turbos FBO
e90 330i 6MT Former
e46 330ci 5MT - RIP
uc1 5AT
em2 5MT
db7 5AT - RIP Quote:
Originally Posted by toyota86 the guys over at lambo vancouver said there are 60-70 pre-orders already. don't quote me though. | |
| |
04-02-2010, 10:20 AM
|
#14 | look at these diamonds, they shining
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,800
Thanked 1,813 Times in 553 Posts
Failed 634 Times in 127 Posts
|
avatar started it all
|
| |
04-02-2010, 10:38 AM
|
#15 | Fanboy
Join Date: May 2006 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,596
Thanked 498 Times in 164 Posts
Failed 91 Times in 28 Posts
|
anyone going to shell out 3-4 grand on an LED 3D TV?
__________________
---------
|
| |
04-02-2010, 10:56 AM
|
#16 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,443
Thanked 61 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 3 Posts
|
I hope Toy Story 3 in 3D won't be disappointing.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by CKMack you'll NEVER understand women | |
| |
04-02-2010, 11:06 AM
|
#17 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 655
Thanked 136 Times in 45 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Whats the diff between these new 3d tv's and 3d blu-ray players than the ones now. I've seen blu-ray discs what come with glasses in the box. So whats the major diff besides the glasses being paper ones?
|
| |
04-02-2010, 01:12 PM
|
#18 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 526
Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 3 Posts
|
3d is a very cool concept but some movies dont need it...they are just jumpng the bandwagon and try and make an extra few bucks...just watched Clash Of The Titans...and i could have watched it regular...no need IMO...
|
| |
04-02-2010, 01:27 PM
|
#19 | I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,677
Thanked 10,395 Times in 3,918 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
|
3D is just the movie industry trying to get people not to pirate movies and go back to the theatres
the Television industry is trying to well... sell TVs they need... well WANT to have people constantly buying the latest televisions etc they were/are hoping Blu-Ray would drive customers to buy more HDTVs and now 3D to buy 3D tvs
i think its retarded too
the Odd 3-D movie is somewhat of a treat.. especially if its a horror movie... but now... when EVERYTHING is 3D its just stupid
|
| |
04-02-2010, 02:52 PM
|
#20 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,705
Thanked 356 Times in 170 Posts
Failed 46 Times in 13 Posts
|
The current problem with 3D is the movie studios holding back on innovation due to limitations of cinemas. 35mm film reel movies in cinemas are shown at 24 frames per second. Digital projection theatres could provide faster frame rates, but movie studios still cling to 24fps because they believe the greater importance is higher resolution, not frame rates. They're afraid of HD resolution being adopted on TV's at home and want to make theatres even higher in resolution. James Cameron has said that faster frame rates are needed in 3D movies to reduce strobing effects of action sequences. Here's a part of an interview with James Cameron: Quote: I'm hearing that there are already calls to increase the frame rate to at least 30 fps for digital 3-D because certain camera moves, especially pans, look jumpy in 3-D. I saw that in the Imax 3-D "Beowulf." You've been an advocate for both 3-D and higher frame rates. Have you seen the problem and do you have any thoughts on it?
For three-fourths of a century of 2-D cinema, we have grown accustomed to the strobing effect produced by the 24 frame per second display rate. When we see the same thing in 3-D, it stands out more, not because it is intrinsically worse, but because all other things have gotten better. Suddenly the image looks so real it's like you're standing there in the room with the characters, but when the camera pans, there is this strange motion artifact. It's like you never saw it before, when in fact it's been hiding in plain sight the whole time. Some people call it judder, others strobing. I call it annoying. It's also easily fixed, because the stereo renaissance is enabled by digital cinema, and digital cinema supplies the answer to the strobing problem.
The DLP chip in our current generation of digital projectors can currently run up to 144 frames per second, and they are still being improved. The maximum data rate currently supports stereo at 24 frames per second or 2-D at 48 frames per second. So right now, today, we could be shooting 2-D movies at 48 frames and running them at that speed. This alone would make 2-D movies look astonishingly clear and sharp, at very little extra cost, with equipment that's already installed or being installed.
Increasing the data-handling capacity of the projectors and servers is not a big deal, if there is demand. I've run tests on 48 frame per second stereo and it is stunning. The cameras can do it, the projectors can (with a small modification) do it. So why aren't we doing it, as an industry?
Because people have been asking the wrong question for years. They have been so focused on resolution, and counting pixels and lines, that they have forgotten about frame rate. Perceived resolution = pixels x replacement rate. A 2K image at 48 frames per second looks as sharp as a 4K image at 24 frames per second ... with one fundamental difference: the 4K/24 image will judder miserably during a panning shot, and the 2K/48 won't. Higher pixel counts only preserve motion artifacts like strobing with greater fidelity. They don't solve them at all.
If every single digital theater was perceived by the audience as being equivalent to Imax or Showscan in image quality, which is readily achievable with off-the-shelf technology now, running at higher frame rates, then isn't that the same kind of marketing hook as 3-D itself? Something you can't get at home. An aspect of the film that you can't pirate.
| |
| |
04-02-2010, 03:14 PM
|
#21 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,529
Thanked 665 Times in 273 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 29 Posts
|
__________________
"A chicken crossing the street is poultry in motion"
|
| |
04-02-2010, 03:32 PM
|
#22 | The Lone Wanderator
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,091
Thanked 4,385 Times in 1,138 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 75 Posts
|
The biggest difference between Avatar and almost every other 3D live-action movie out there is that Avatar was filmed in 3D, but the others had 3D added in post production.
Films which are designed to work with 3D (and not just as a gimmick, having something jump out at you), may be the future. But only if people can follow Cameron's lead and realize that you need a better framerate for balance, and that 3D doesn't have to be a gimmick.
|
| |
04-02-2010, 03:42 PM
|
#23 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,671
Thanked 5,161 Times in 1,903 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
|
I wasn't blown away with Avatar's 3D... Especially with how everyone was raving about it... It gave me a freaking headache.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4
A vehicle for all occasions
|
| |
04-02-2010, 03:44 PM
|
#24 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North Van
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 75 Times in 26 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
| |
| |
04-02-2010, 04:21 PM
|
#25 | Banned (ABWS)?
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 19,378
Thanked 4,079 Times in 1,745 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 211 Posts
|
I just don't want to pay the 3D price to watch it. LOL
|
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36 AM. |