REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-17-2010, 10:39 AM   #51
SFICC-03*
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: richmond
Posts: 8,087
Thanked 2,472 Times in 997 Posts
bill gates could buy like 300 of them
Advertisement
unit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 10:52 AM   #52
what manner of phaggotry is this
 
RRxtar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco911 View Post
Harper is also making sure that $30 bln in parts get sourced from Canadian manufaturers for this plane if the deal is to go through.
that too.

In just the developement, Canada had a return on its investment.

"Ottawa has invested $168 million into the development of the Joint Strike Fighter Program, which has already produced a return of $350 million in contracts for 85 Canadian companies, research laboratories and universities"


I remember an article a while back which said that Canadian companies lost a few of the contracts for the JSF, but in general, Canada is still coming out of it in very good shape.
__________________
STRENGTHaesthetics
RRxtar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 11:05 AM   #53
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
cressydrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: surrey
Posts: 1,203
Thanked 2,719 Times in 392 Posts
__________________
2014 Taco TRD
2006 3 GT
1993 Integra RS
1982 TE72
1988 5.0
1990 S13 Coupe
2006 Mazda B4000 4x4
1987 Ae86 Coupe
1988 Cressida Wagon
1985 Cressida 7m Swap
1987 Ae86 Hatch
1989 FC
cressydrift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 11:09 AM   #54
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
cressydrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: surrey
Posts: 1,203
Thanked 2,719 Times in 392 Posts
Buying the F-35 is a waste of money compared to the F-22. We don't need the vertical takeoff capabilities. We need a long distance, high speed aircraft to patrol the lands of our vast country.




Oh and I would say thats a pretty short take off^
__________________
2014 Taco TRD
2006 3 GT
1993 Integra RS
1982 TE72
1988 5.0
1990 S13 Coupe
2006 Mazda B4000 4x4
1987 Ae86 Coupe
1988 Cressida Wagon
1985 Cressida 7m Swap
1987 Ae86 Hatch
1989 FC
cressydrift is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 07-17-2010, 11:23 AM   #55
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 52,534
Thanked 23,859 Times in 8,217 Posts
Did they say that Canada will be getting the short takeoff version?
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 11:47 AM   #56
My homepage has been set to RS
 
tool001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 2,217
Thanked 811 Times in 274 Posts
all said and done, canada doesn't need F-35 type aircraft. yes canada has already $ invested in it , but the cost of maintaining these aircraft will be too high. and they haven't been arn't being even actively used. that means, no body know how much it will cost to keep them in the air. Take f-22 for example, for every hour it spends in the air, i needs 30 of hrs of maintenance.

Canadian air force, hardly sees action, and cannot justify purchasing F-35 type of machine. the most they should go for is Super Hornets , or other single engine type air crafts, or even EF.
2ndly the argument of parts being produced in canada will help canada, is a bogus argument. Cause that can be done with any manufacturer, not only US. case example India is in the process of procuring 126 fighter jets for around $10billion and they have put that 40-50% parts will be produced locally into the contract that means (40-50% will be re-invested by whoever they select into the indian economy for parts etc)
NOT to mention Transfer of Technology is also listed as a requirnment. THey just finished field testing 6 aircraft and will short listing 3-4. All the aircrafts that they are at, is what canada should be looking at also.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_MRCA_competition

Case example, take sea king helicopters. after the liberals came into power, they squashed that deal, costing another $500 mil to canada. (same fate is likely as liberals are already up against this deal).

Last edited by tool001; 07-17-2010 at 11:54 AM.
tool001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 11:49 AM   #57
what manner of phaggotry is this
 
RRxtar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
its been said like 5 times in this thread.

the F22 is NOT AVAILABLE to Canada. and will be out of production in 2 years. Canada doesnt receive its first F35 for 6 years.

the F35 is basically the ONLY option for Canada.

from what I understand the F22 had such a short run because it simply costs way to much to keep flying and all the systems which were so advanced at first, are now already getting dated and are not compatable with any other systems. the JSF is supposed to be a very upgradable machine with a long life expectancy like the jets built in the 60s-70s which are still in the air and now on their 4th or 5th varients.


and one of the reasons Canada needs a fighter is the debate over claims to the North Pole are starting to heat up with Russia being one of the countries wanting a stake. dont doubt theres oil up there, and dont doubt the Russians want it as bad as we do. and dont think the environmental and financial impact of Canada losing the north, wont affect the whole country. I would not hesitate for a second to think the US 'suggested' Canada get more involved in such things.
__________________
STRENGTHaesthetics

Last edited by RRxtar; 07-17-2010 at 11:57 AM.
RRxtar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 05:57 PM   #58
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Solo_D33A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 540
Thanked 79 Times in 22 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorneringArtist View Post
The F35 is one of few "fifth-generation" jet fighters. Basically the top-end of planes in terms of technology; like the F35 having basic stealth capability. Many of the other planes in that category are either prototypes, or have yet to enter production. The only 5th-gen plane that is expected to enter production at the same time as the F35 is the Russian Sukhoi PAK FA. The previous 4.5-gens are relatively older, but somewhat decent planes in terms of abilities, like the Typhoon, Rafale M, Gripen, F16, and updated versions of the MiG-35 F15 and F18.

If it was up to me, and it was a production model, and it was ethical for Canada to buy Russian military hardware, I'd want the Sukhoi Su-47 protecting our skies. Shit's badass.
I'd love to see one of these around (Not due to warfare of course ), T50 PAK FA

Solo_D33A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 06:59 PM   #59
Official Texas Ambassador
 
El Bastardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 10,333
Thanked 5,671 Times in 1,324 Posts
This is a good start, but its not enough. We've updated our air support from a bunch of guys in cessnas dropping beer bottles full of gas on the enemy to something a little more modern. Now we need to take our navy and army seriously. Cold War-era equipment isn't going to cut it in 2010.
El Bastardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 07:16 PM   #60
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 121
Thanked 48 Times in 10 Posts
our tax money!
Leparto is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 07-17-2010, 11:44 PM   #61
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leparto View Post
our tax money!
What about our tax money?
Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 11:50 PM   #62
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
cressydrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: surrey
Posts: 1,203
Thanked 2,719 Times in 392 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar View Post
its been said like 5 times in this thread.

the F22 is NOT AVAILABLE to Canada. and will be out of production in 2 years. Canada doesnt receive its first F35 for 6 years.

the F35 is basically the ONLY option for Canada.

and one of the reasons Canada needs a fighter is the debate over claims to the North Pole are starting to heat up with Russia being one of the countries wanting a stake.
I understand that we can't get the F-22, but we need a plane with the same capabilities as the F-22. How are the F-35's going to stand a chance against the SU's in air to air combat? * If that was to ever happen*.
__________________
2014 Taco TRD
2006 3 GT
1993 Integra RS
1982 TE72
1988 5.0
1990 S13 Coupe
2006 Mazda B4000 4x4
1987 Ae86 Coupe
1988 Cressida Wagon
1985 Cressida 7m Swap
1987 Ae86 Hatch
1989 FC
cressydrift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 12:01 AM   #63
:inoutugh:
 
TOS'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ඞ
Posts: 9,969
Thanked 5,836 Times in 1,838 Posts
mmmmm

__________________
Posted from NE 1-J W Inglis Building
TOS'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 12:07 AM   #64
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
SolidPenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 821
Thanked 796 Times in 185 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOS'd View Post
mmmmm]
Why the hell would we need that. The F35 makes sense, a B2 doesnt. Plus, then people will definately start complaining considering theyre $2billion+ each.
SolidPenguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 01:28 AM   #65
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Solo_D33A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 540
Thanked 79 Times in 22 Posts
B2s are for attack bomb runs, unlike the F35, multi-role defense fighter. Plus, running F35 should be much cheaper than say a F22... Besides, what are the chances we'll face a whole bunch of fighters that have F35+ capability? UN and states ain't gonna attack Canada, China, India, and Russian fighter's still in the development phase, Mitsubishi's making a copy of the F22 iirc, It'll be much more possible we'll have to face long range missiles and fleets of submarines than have air to air combat... In any case, F35 can be fitted to all situations.... just like all season tires, not the best, but plenty enough.
Solo_D33A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 02:08 AM   #66
what manner of phaggotry is this
 
RRxtar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
air to air dog fighting is a thing of the past.
__________________
STRENGTHaesthetics
RRxtar is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 07-18-2010, 09:24 AM   #67
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Narayan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: BC
Posts: 2,230
Thanked 29 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastarocket View Post
The way that the federal government under PM Harper spends our tax dollars makes my blood boil these days.

This article highlights the government plans to buy 65 jet fighters to replace the 40 year old CF-18 jet fighters:

http://www.canada.com/business/Feds+...911/story.html

What pisses me off is that this government spends our hard earned tax dollars on military priorities instead of building a better healthcare program, social housing, and education for Canadians.

Do the feds even comparison shop and review defence contracts to get the best deal? Read the article yourself. Canada is getting single engine jet fighters, at around $140 million each, when you can buy twin engine jet fighters at a lower price.

Now I am all for the country to have a decent military which has the equipment to defend our airspace and coastline from foreign threats, fishing poachers, etc. But $9 billion dollars ??????


Your thoughts about the latest government purchase on the military?
20 posts and you're been failed in 25% of them... you rock sir
__________________
Feedback: http://www.revscene.net/forums/showt...hlight=narayan

Quasi loves men
Narayan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 09:36 AM   #68
I Wanna Go Fast!
 
JDął's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 5,907
Thanked 2,393 Times in 587 Posts
I laugh at the people saying the F35 is a waste of money and that we don't need it. The CF-18's are pushing 40 years old. They're updated to the very latest weapons and radar technologies available and are still very capable, but with fighters like the F-22, F-35, SU-37, T-50 and so on out there... Canada needs a 21st century jet.

There are 3 versions of the F-35 that were designed for different roles within the US militrary. A standard version (USAF), Navy version with bigger control services and beefed up landing gear for carriers (USN), and the STOVL version with vertical takeoff capabilities (Marines). Canada as far as I know is getting the Navy version, so no we will not have the planes that can hover. The Marines are using them to replace their Harriers.

Though a lot of people don't realize it, pretty much any major threat that might attack North America (Russia, North Korea, etc) is going to come by flying over the North Pole. Guess which country they come across first? The Russians pulled their old Cold War era Bear Bombers out of mothball a couple years ago and have been ROUTINELY punching into Canadian and American airspace over the Pole as a way of saying "We're here and look what we can do". Should a situation with the Russians ever arise the fighters that would be escorting them would be one of a number of VERY capable fighters such as the SU-37, SU-47, or the new Sukhoi T-50. In short, Canada's F18's wouldn't stand a chance. We NEED the F35.

Here's what we're up against:

As an aside: there was a recent incident involving a USAF F15. They're about as old as the F18 and those airframes have been pushed hard for the past 30-40 years. One actually came apart behind the cockpit while in the air because the airframe was so tired it couldn't handle the stress anymore. Basically the same thing as when you bend a piece of metal back and forth over and over it eventually weakens and snaps. It grounded the entire F15 fleet for a period of time. We do not want that happening to our ONLY northern defense weapon. Bring on the F35 (and fingers crossed I get selected to fly it).

Last edited by JDął; 07-18-2010 at 11:37 AM.
JDął is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 07-18-2010, 09:46 AM   #69
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Solo_D33A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 540
Thanked 79 Times in 22 Posts
Isn't SU47 pulled out due to high twist on wing design?
Solo_D33A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 10:51 AM   #70
"Entertainment" mod.
 
CorneringArtist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 5,110
Thanked 3,428 Times in 1,049 Posts
^There's that, and the development of the MiG into a 5th gen fighter. Only one was ever made as a technology demonstrator.
__________________
Borokusowagen.
CorneringArtist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 11:22 AM   #71
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 52,534
Thanked 23,859 Times in 8,217 Posts
If you want to see a sneak peak of how awesome the F-35 is, watch Die Hard 4

SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 11:26 AM   #72
Official Texas Ambassador
 
El Bastardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 10,333
Thanked 5,671 Times in 1,324 Posts
But... but... what if the terrorists have boxes?
El Bastardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 11:33 AM   #73
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Brianrietta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 49°06'N121°58'W
Posts: 1,106
Thanked 1,133 Times in 309 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Bastardo View Post
But... but... what if the terrorists have boxes?
The west has the hedgehog. He's wrecked enough box in his time that I doubt they'll be coming anytime soon.

__________________
nabs - Brianrietta are you trying to Mindbomber me? using big words to try to confuse me
jasonturbo - Threesomes: overrated - I didn't really think it was anything special, plus it was degrading, marching to the bathroom to fart all that semen out
Babykiller - And next to that, there's a little dot called a period. It's not the stuff you eat out of your sisters gash, it's a handy little tool for breaking up sentences so they don't look like nonsensical retard garbage.
Brianrietta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 09:59 PM   #74
HELP ME PLS!!!
 
johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: here
Posts: 5,793
Thanked 146 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastarocket View Post

What pisses me off is that this government spends our hard earned tax dollars on military priorities instead of building a better healthcare program, social housing, and education for Canadians.
heath care and education is provincial. not federal.... lean how government works before ranting about it.

who cares about social housing. don't have a job, go sleep in the forest. I ain't paying for you.

I bet $10 that Russia will attack us within the next 10 years. we need defence.. the liberals didn't spend any money for years and now we have nothing. time to get some stuff back. is that the best choice? I have no idea. I'm not a rocket scientist. now we need some navy ships and arm the coast guard boats.
johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 10:04 PM   #75
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: vancity
Posts: 306
Thanked 74 Times in 22 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by unit View Post
bill gates could buy like 300 of them
The sultan of brunei could buy 1000 of them.
mqr03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net