REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-19-2010, 04:08 PM   #26
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
This is icbc's job, not yours
Posted via RS Mobile
Advertisement
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 04:30 PM   #27
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
donjalapeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Guadalajara
Posts: 4,763
Thanked 5,613 Times in 1,255 Posts
Failed 1,578 Times in 359 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by iambuRnz View Post
they need to show proof that they've been visiting the doctor. (receipts, etc.) otherwise they have no case against your sister.
this....
donjalapeno is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-19-2010, 05:26 PM   #28
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
tonyvu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Van.
Posts: 2,929
Thanked 1,967 Times in 290 Posts
Failed 536 Times in 92 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by akalic View Post
will be needing some pics of your sister to assess the issue properly
I see what you did there....

__________________
RIP JN

UNCE UNCE UNCE!

Quote:
Originally Posted by strykn View Post
Comparing A&B with deadmau5? Really? I should fucking slap you

2007 Acura TL
2005 Acura TL....RIP
2003 Honda Accord Coupe V6....RIP
tonyvu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 06:05 PM   #29
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
RiceIntegraRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,865
Thanked 1,057 Times in 429 Posts
Failed 178 Times in 73 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
This is icbc's job, not yours
Posted via RS Mobile

this! This is why we have insurance. The lady cant sue u, they sue ICBC for injuries. They only sue u cause ICBC must of rejected their claim and then, they dont have a leg to stand on
RiceIntegraRS is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-19-2010, 06:18 PM   #30
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
It's just part of the law to sue the defendent, even if its through ICBC. ICBC gets a copy and the defendent.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 06:19 PM   #31
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 584
Thanked 194 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 164 Times in 42 Posts
I rear-ended a lady many years ago. Very minor collision that didn't even scratch the paint on the bumpers. Hell, my drink on my seat didn't even spill over.

Lady got out and was holding her neck claiming it was sore. Then proceeded to file claim for injuries.

Long story short, she was denied. The type of injury she was claiming is called "soft tissue damage" which is almost impossible to detect which is why it's so easy for people to scam insurance companies. All they need is a "sympathetic" doctor to say you are indeed suffering. You can't use an x-ray or ultrasound to detect this type of injury.

Unfortunately for her, the type of injury she was trying to fake is the kind that never causes pain until usually the next day. Sort of like when you play sports after being idle for awhile. You feel fine, but the next day you're sore.

The fact she grabbed her neck right after the accident is why she was denied. If she had said she felt fine, but then was sore the next morning she could have gotten money.

Sound like what this lady is trying.
ericthehalfbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 06:31 PM   #32
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
Not entirely true. If you have enough sources that agree that something is wrong (in my case physio, doctor and chiro), they still have to pay you out. I was pretty shaken up. As I was about to go to bed about 7 hours later I started to feel really stiff. Next day I couldnt even my neck or back and I had shooting pains going down my leg.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 07:07 PM   #33
I don't like cheese but I love milk!
 
Ferra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Van
Posts: 1,980
Thanked 895 Times in 243 Posts
Failed 105 Times in 49 Posts
bottom line, THERE IS NOTHING YOUR SISTER HAS TO WORRY ABOUT

it doesn't matter if the women sue for $50,000 or 1,000,000, ICBC will be paying the bill. (of course unless she is suing for an amount that exceed your 3rd party liabilities and won...typically 1-3 millions.)
Ferra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 07:09 PM   #34
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 584
Thanked 194 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 164 Times in 42 Posts
^ If you were rear-ended with significant force, then you could have a sore neck or other injuries that cause pain immediately.

However, unfortunatley, most people don't suffer injuries from these "low speed/low damage" rear-enders. They just milk the system for "pain and suffering" and see an opportunity to get a quick $5K or $10K.

A co-worker also hit a young girl and the damage to the cars was minimal. She tried to sue ICBC for money, ICBC provided the lawyers and contacted my buddy on everything he had to do. She was also denied as it was determined the energy of the impact (based on vehicle damage) was not enough to cause injuries. Good Guys -1, Scamming Bitch - 0.

For those that think this is OK, you should know that almost 50% of ICBC's expenses are for payouts for rear-end accidents where people usually claim whiplash or other neck problems.

Next time you bitch about insurance, just think that 50% of your insurance rate is going to these people, and a LOT of them are milking the system.
ericthehalfbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 07:24 PM   #35
I don't like cheese but I love milk!
 
Ferra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Van
Posts: 1,980
Thanked 895 Times in 243 Posts
Failed 105 Times in 49 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericthehalfbee View Post
^ If you were rear-ended with significant force, then you could have a sore neck or other injuries that cause pain immediately.

However, unfortunatley, most people don't suffer injuries from these "low speed/low damage" rear-enders. They just milk the system for "pain and suffering" and see an opportunity to get a quick $5K or $10K.

Next time you bitch about insurance, just think that 50% of your insurance rate is going to these people, and a LOT of them are milking the system.
I blame this on overly lenient doctors...
in court, a doctor's report or testimonial is the only thing that really count...judge doesn't care whether they collision is at 10km/h or 100km/h. as long as the so called "professional" said there is injury..then there is injury (unless you find another "professional" that proves otherwise.)
Ferra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 07:25 PM   #36
rsx
Lomac owned my ass at least once
 
rsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,259
Thanked 3,463 Times in 820 Posts
Failed 444 Times in 144 Posts
Talk to ICBC before anything. They'll advise you on next steps.

Good luck.

Don't worry, ICBC hires PI's to tail suspected scammers. Hell, I used to work for HBT and we hired PI's for people who claim long term disability.
rsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 07:31 PM   #37
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericthehalfbee View Post
^ If you were rear-ended with significant force, then you could have a sore neck or other injuries that cause pain immediately.

However, unfortunatley, most people don't suffer injuries from these "low speed/low damage" rear-enders. They just milk the system for "pain and suffering" and see an opportunity to get a quick $5K or $10K.

A co-worker also hit a young girl and the damage to the cars was minimal. She tried to sue ICBC for money, ICBC provided the lawyers and contacted my buddy on everything he had to do. She was also denied as it was determined the energy of the impact (based on vehicle damage) was not enough to cause injuries. Good Guys -1, Scamming Bitch - 0.

For those that think this is OK, you should know that almost 50% of ICBC's expenses are for payouts for rear-end accidents where people usually claim whiplash or other neck problems.

Next time you bitch about insurance, just think that 50% of your insurance rate is going to these people, and a LOT of them are milking the system.
anyone in the same situation would try to do the same.

also I tboned someone threw an intersection on a one way street.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 08:08 PM   #38
"They call me Bowser...RawR!"
 
!LittleDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,285
Thanked 1,007 Times in 395 Posts
Failed 60 Times in 31 Posts
A few years ago, I got bumped by a CRV. My bumber had to be resprayed and that was it. $500 worth of damage. Problem was, a few days later, I couldn't turn my head and that lasted for about 2 weeks. Tried to get an injury claim going from ICBC but that was quickly shot down for obvious reasons. I would've been screwed if I didn't have extended medical covering the costs. When I was done, I called my ICBC adjustor to reiterate that I was not looking for money and that they will be receiving a bill from Pacific Blue Cross for close to $10k. All that wasted time going to physio, massage, chiro, doctor's appointments, etc...
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
!LittleDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 08:47 PM   #39
JDMEK9Mod | DogWhisperer
 
spoon.ek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond
Posts: 15,267
Thanked 6,134 Times in 1,991 Posts
Failed 107 Times in 67 Posts
i was in this situation close to a decade ago.

i was cut off before merging onto a single lane bridge by some douche bag and about 20m after the bridge there are inactive railroad tracks. he stomps on his brakes just before the tracks and i of course rear end him. i say he stomped on his brakes because no one slows down to cross these tracks. they are smooth as butter. weather was clear, not even wet pavement from rain.

after the collision, i get out run to his car and ask if he's alright. after a couple of minutes (while i'm on the phone), he gets out and immediately tells me to call an ambulance. mind you, he got out of the car on his own, he's standing up straight, and he looks completely fine.

as we exchange information, the ambulance arrives. immediately, he grabs his neck and grimaces in pain.

good. fucking. game.

so about 2 years later, i get served with a notice saying i'm being sued by this fucker. ICBC contacts me, tells me i have to appear downtown at a "discovery" into the incident. i was adament until the end that this idiot had no reason to suddenly stop like that.

about a month after all of this, I emailed my lawyer asking out of curiousity what the result was. he told me the guy was paid $20,000.

nothing came out of my pocket, except for the raise in insurance which was inevitable.
__________________
1998 Honda Civic EK9 - GQ || 1990 Honda Civic Si ED7 - DD || 1990 Honda Civic ED6 - RIP
VCC Buy/Sell rating 60-0-0 || RS Buy/Sell rating 20-0-0 || HT Buy/Sell rating 1-0-0
IG: @spoon.ek9
Spoiler!
spoon.ek9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 09:22 PM   #40
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
xyz123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 514
Thanked 81 Times in 29 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 6 Posts
http://www.icbc.com/claims/injury/process_claims

Don't know if this helps but these are the steps in which someone claiming for injury must go through to complete an injury claim. Kind of interesting if you read through it. Been in a rear end accident 2 months ago, it sucks; however the person that I rear ended didn't get past stage 3.
xyz123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 09:39 PM   #41
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 4,846
Thanked 722 Times in 275 Posts
Failed 86 Times in 38 Posts
wtf after two years? what kinda bullshit is that?
was she asian?
getting the car holding back of the neck, is all faking it lol
ImportPsycho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 09:46 PM   #42
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
this sounds normal. Most law firms wont touch a case till after 2 years.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 12:29 AM   #43
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Qmx323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 5,097
Thanked 2,886 Times in 986 Posts
Failed 221 Times in 82 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenstoner View Post
if someone is seriousy injuried the neck during accident, he/she wouldnt be able to "get out" the car and able to move his/her neck

i call bs

has paramedic attend and sent her to hospital afterward ?
lol... reminds me of the time i got hit by a car, no pain for the rest of the day

the next 10 days
Qmx323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 01:47 AM   #44
Hellaflush
 
izzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 95
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferra View Post
bottom line, THERE IS NOTHING YOUR SISTER HAS TO WORRY ABOUT

it doesn't matter if the women sue for $50,000 or 1,000,000, ICBC will be paying the bill. (of course unless she is suing for an amount that exceed your 3rd party liabilities and won...typically 1-3 millions.)
This is not entirely true. Yes ICBC third party liability will pay to cover damage to property and injuries for the other party involved in the collision, but your insurance rates will go up. You lose you discount and move up on the claims rated scale, meaning your increase in premiums pretty much pays icbc back what they payed out.

You may also pay out a claim to regain your claims rated scale discount, however claims involving bodily injury are not payable and you just have to work your way back to a better discount.
__________________
slam poke drop tuck . dope
izzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 02:36 AM   #45
Banned (ABWS)
 
Walperstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Wack
Posts: 889
Thanked 60 Times in 33 Posts
Failed 35 Times in 21 Posts
First mistake is coming to the internet looking for legal advice. 2nd is not posting pics of your sister like the 2nd post requested.
Walperstyle is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-20-2010, 07:19 AM   #46
MG1
Fathered more RS members than anybody else. Who's your daddy?
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,203
Thanked 11,832 Times in 5,078 Posts
Failed 317 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walperstyle View Post
First mistake is coming to the internet looking for legal advice. 2nd is not posting pics of your sister like the 2nd post requested.
Actually, I thought the title said, "My sis is getting used." I was like gotta check this out. Pics to assess the situation. WOW!!!


Wait........... what if she is like............ uh............... nvm.
__________________
Quote:
"there but for the grace of god go I"
Quote:
Youth is, indeed, wasted on the young.
YODO = You Only Die Once.

Dirty look from MG1 can melt steel beams.

"There must be dissonance before resolution - MG1" a musical reference.
MG1 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-20-2010, 07:20 AM   #47
I don't like cheese but I love milk!
 
Ferra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Van
Posts: 1,980
Thanked 895 Times in 243 Posts
Failed 105 Times in 49 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by izzer View Post
This is not entirely true. Yes ICBC third party liability will pay to cover damage to property and injuries for the other party involved in the collision, but your insurance rates will go up. You lose you discount and move up on the claims rated scale, meaning your increase in premiums pretty much pays icbc back what they payed out.

You may also pay out a claim to regain your claims rated scale discount, however claims involving bodily injury are not payable and you just have to work your way back to a better discount.
OP said they already went thru ICBC 2 years ago...I don't think they have any intention to pay out the claim by now.

as for ICBC, a claim is a claim, a $5000 claim affect your insurance the same way a $1 million claim would
Ferra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 07:21 AM   #48
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
what if she is like what
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 07:40 AM   #49
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
dai3yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,575
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
The statute of limitations for making a 'claim' against an insurance policy is 2 years, that's why the Writ is being served now. If the lawyer did not serve the writ within the 2 year period, then the other person has no case.

BTW, I love how people in this thread are like, no f*cking way should this person be paid anything, they're faking, etc. etc. but in other threads where Revscene members have been in accidents, the comments are all, "Woohoo! You've hit the ICBC lottery!! Take the @ssholes for all that you can!!"

IMO, I think that if you've been injured, no matter how little, you should be reasonably compensated according to your injuries.
dai3yuen is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-20-2010, 08:23 AM   #50
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
hotjoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 12,760
Thanked 689 Times in 376 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 89blkcivic View Post
Actually, I thought the title said, "My sis is getting used." I was like gotta check this out. Pics to assess the situation. WOW!!!


Wait........... what if she is like............ uh............... nvm.
you're hilarious
hotjoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net