nah, hes probably busy posting the same shit he posts here on the 20 other forums hes subscribed to

Thanks.

One thing I'd like to point out: A Police Union is there to voice not just the "union agenda", but also what the union members feel. The Department puts out press releases that its own media department first creates and then vets; if the chief releases anything you can bet that it's probably gone through a few hands first.

I think this is a good read. It states that quite a bit of breathalyzers have about .005 margin of error. Sorry if it's repost

It has already been posted in the Police section that the police use 0.050 to 0.099 for the "warn" range":

http://www.revscene.net/forums/showp...22&postcount=6

Thus there is very little likelihood you'll blow a 0.076 and be out by 0.005 to blow a 0.081 as the article states. Notice how the article even has a statement from Chung that 0.010 is used, yet still provides the ridiculous example.

JD13, these are the type of people who agree with your opinion. Thankfully I don't have these types of supporters.

I issued a challenge:

You failed to accept this challenge, thus I have nothing left to prove. Your inability to prove me wrong speaks for itself. Keep posting your "opinion" to continue proving yourself wrong - I'll stick to the facts and continue to be correct.

I subscribe to facts and figures when making law, not feelings.

I have many friends as officers in various levels of policing - despite my support for the police, I would not want some some of their feelings becoming law.

Some facts, not opinion:

Compared to:

Thus more people are killed by alcohol related crashes that by homicides in BC, and those alcohol related crashes represent 25% of all crashes leading to death.

Thus assigning resources to wait for tow trucks rather than expensive and lengthy homicide investigations might be a better use of police resources since more people are killed in BC by drinking and driving.

Yet for some reason the VPD union didn't hit on this, or any other fact related to decreasing the number of alcohol related injuries or fatalities... yet did mention money and staffing a couple times... I wonder if they have a hidden agenda... or if you'll be smart enough to see it.

Damn Taylor192, Judging by the times of your posts. you just spent another 28 mins of your life arguing on the internet. Not to mention the hours of research you do so it looks like you have a credible position.


:bla :wgaf: :Petting

:5shots: :dizzy:

I wonder how people would feel about the installation of mandatory alcohol interlock devices equipped on cars. This would eliminate the need for as heavy police enforcement, and would accomplish an even greater disruption of drinking and driving.

And in the end, wouldn't it be nearly as cost effective?

LOLOLOLOL :rofl: Good comparison bud. If everyone that had a drivers license had a gun to shoot off everyday I wonder what the stats would look like then? Keep trying to justify your position with completely unrelated arguments, it really is a good laugh :haha:

Lol logic really evades you eh

he's a roid monkey that loves to speed and drink&drive on his motorcycle logic isn't part of his repertoire

:rofl:

I supplement my income very nicely by renting out my properties. That's where my credibility comes in.
What about you? When are you going to put your money where your mouth is?

If you as smart as you think you are, you would pull your head out of your ass and act on all that knowledge you think you have, instead of wasting your life fighting with random people on the internet. Face it, you're a nobody, driving an old wannabe baller ride with fake wheels, wasting literally hours online trying to push your ideas on others. You're the true definition of a troll. Like a Marco911, but without a single ounce of success to back your claims.

You make me want to log out.

It was a joke, I was just pulling a Chris Taylor :troll:

ROFL AT THE GOOGLE AD

http://members.shaw.ca/rsb1/hah/lol.jpg



;)

I did, I sold my property and invested the profits.

You instead continued to give the members here advice to buy properties and rent them out, despite not being able to produce a single cash flow positive property in Vancouver when asked. That's where credibility is earned. The LottoMax winner isn't any more credible than you are, just as lucky.

If you were as smart as you claim, you'd sell your rental properties. A $500K condo fully paid off rented for $2500/mn only generates a cash flow of $24K/yr, or 4.8% return that is income and taxed accordingly. If you have a mortgage, the return is even less- and you're holding leveraged assets with reasonably risky potential to decrease in value over the next 5-10 years.

Instead the equity could be invested in guaranteed Canadian dividend producing investments, making you 6% with would be very tax advantaged with no potential loss of asset value. You could then buy back into real estate when prices boom again, since you accurately predicted the latest boom.

Who's to say I cannot do both?

I have a 6 figure investment, RRSP account, and salary at 31yo. Enough to afford me the same luxury you enjoy: wasting time posting online, you didn't get to ~17K posts without wasting some time online :p Sure, I don't have the riches you have, yet I'm not a glorified lottery winner giving bad advice to others that will only serve to lose them money in the current market - we cannot go back in time to reproduce your lucky decision - and it is obviously luck as no-one who knows rental properties would advise anyone to buy one in the current Vancouver market - yet you did, and stubbornly stood behind it even when challenged.

The definition of a troll is someone who posts nothing of use. I'd call you a troll, yet you're worse than that. Your advise could actually cause harm if some member buys a rental property in today's market thinking they could repeat your luck.

Please log out, people do not need to be fooled to follow your bad advice based on lucky decisions.

You should thank me for having my car, otherwise you'd have nothing to make fun of.

Pretty much everything goes over his head.

You'd have to have done your research and backed up your opinion with facts to do that.

Judging by your posts you wasted 10 mins surfing RS making useless posts with no credible position :p At least I spent some time learning :D

In all seriousness, I'm an information junkie. This why I read/post on so many different forums and blogs.

And the cat came back, the very next day, and the cat came back, thought he was a goner... :Pbjt:



Man, its one thing to be opinionated and passionate about your topic. But when you start linking posts by RS members from other forums, which are about comepletely unrelated topics, Then you look like a creepy douche bag who spends their time googlin' someones username in a effort to discredit them.

That's childish man. You say you're 31 and successful. Then why are you posting like an immature 14 dolla baller? :hi:

You might want to review some history before you point the finger in the wrong direction.

Read this thread from beginning to end, you'll find the first insulting post here:
http://www.revscene.net/forums/showp...8&postcount=73
and the next here:
http://www.revscene.net/forums/showp...&postcount=100

There are your immature members who cannot have an educated discussion without bringing in unrelated insults. If you find a post of mine that is insulting or unrelated prior to those posts, please link it.

Since you may be unaware, JD13 previously called me out for being banned on the forum BCSB. I don't know his username on BCSB, he knew mine. Otherwise I wouldn't have known to provide a link to BCSB. I don't think he is stalking me anymore than I am stalking him, I just use a common name and we surf the same forums.

I found this comment both immature and unnecessarily insulting:

http://www.revscene.net/forums/showp...&postcount=113

You come across as a well-educated person, however, the hostility is totally unnecessary. When challenged, you become condescending and combative. It really brings the forum down having to read an insult match between two people in an otherwise informative thread. And lately, the commonality I see in those threads is that it's taylor192 vs _________ .

Your opinions are often unpopular. That's fine. However, you come across with your "too bad so sad" tone and then try to justify it by riding what you believe to be the facts. And with those facts, you turn into a total dick towards anyone that tries to offer a differing viewpoint, as evidenced above. If someone doesn't buy your facts, they are either incapable of basic comprehension, can't formulate sentences or otherwise.

Truthfully, I'm getting sick and tired of it. I welcomed your initial return to this forum. However, at this point, I'm not sure why you have been kept around. Either your tone has to change or the staff on this site should remove you for betterment of this forum.

Kev

I will agree that comment was condescending - if you'll agree it is far from the first immature and unnecessarily insulting post in that thread (not to be mistaken for this thread), and that my post is not the first of the unnecessary posts.

Read this thread from the beginning. With the exception of one "drama queen" post I have responded to every challenge with facts and opinion, leaving the condescending and combative attitude for the most part out.

What I am guilty of is not ignoring the few members who consistently engage me in negative behaviour. The moderators have asked me to, and I try to, yet if someone openly insults you, and also taunts you about not being able to do anything about it - what would you do? Yes I should be better than that, and so should they. So why does the finger get pointed at my rather than them? as you point out:
The staff have asked me to keep my tone down, and if you review this thread I have except when engaged first by a few members. If you review my posts in every other section except AC/OT you'll find none of the same issues.

Thus the commonality is not "taylor vs all of RS". It is "taylor vs a few select members", yet those select members are given more leeway to post unnecessary material cause they share the popular opinion.