REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   need help deciding on a suv (https://www.revscene.net/forums/628804-need-help-deciding-suv.html)

FerrariEnzo 10-28-2010 05:05 PM

need help deciding on a suv
 
im looking to get an older SUV.. something around 1996-1998...

should i got with jap like 4runner/pathfinder.. or go domestic with the explorer/jimmy/blazer type?

this will be a winter SUV, so 4x4 is a must..

anyone with good/bad experience with these particular years of suvs? anything to watch out for thats costly to repair

seakrait 10-28-2010 05:16 PM

watch out for older pathfinders, super easy to steal as the keys and ignition get worn down, so much so that any key (or screwdriver) will open it and start it. that's my limited experience anyway...

Phatmobile 10-28-2010 05:48 PM

what's your price range?

get a 2002+ Pathfinder if that's within your price range, the 3.5L engine is so much better than the 3.3L

Redlines_Daily 10-28-2010 05:49 PM

I used to have a 4x4 Jimmy, the only thing I ever had to fix were the shocks that open that back window.

GLOW 10-28-2010 06:57 PM

older 4runners are built like tanks. my friend had a 96 4banger and it had like 350,000 kms and was still running strong. he was telling me they are known to go up to 500,000 km. i believe him

jpark 10-28-2010 07:33 PM

^yess +1 on the 4runners, those things wont die

rJZx 10-28-2010 07:45 PM

+1 with 4runners, my neighbor has a 95 4runner i believe...? but anyways he bought it straight from the dealer and it still running... i believe he is around 330km?

asahai69 10-28-2010 07:54 PM

jeep

/thread

danizer 10-28-2010 07:59 PM

http://www.ssip.net/upload/lamborghi...ront-1_149.jpg
how can you say no?

4runner should be a good choice though..there has to be a reason there are a million of them in east side

boss604 10-28-2010 09:07 PM

4runner or pathfinder !

CorneringArtist 10-28-2010 09:34 PM

+1 for 4runner. but I hear that some of the V6's are POS'es, and people switch to or try to find the 4-banger version.

Can anyone elaborate?

FerrariEnzo 10-28-2010 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seakrait (Post 7164319)
watch out for older pathfinders, super easy to steal as the keys and ignition get worn down, so much so that any key (or screwdriver) will open it and start it. that's my limited experience anyway...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeremy_888 (Post 7164361)
I used to have a 4x4 Jimmy, the only thing I ever had to fix were the shocks that open that back window.

Very useful tips..

Thanx




I dont really want to spend a whole lot as its only for winter driving, mostly on the highway to chillwack... so getting a 2002+ would be outa my price range.
Since a lot of you guys recommend the 4runner, i will look into that... which years of the 4runners are good.. after 95?

Volvo-brickster 10-28-2010 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siu-p (Post 7164359)
what's your price range?

get a 2002+ Pathfinder if that's within your price range, the 3.5L engine is so much better than the 3.3L

3.5's are notorious for the power valve failing and burning up the motor because of a dropped screw

El Dumbasso 10-28-2010 11:26 PM

DO EET!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...pathfinder.jpg

Renthal 10-29-2010 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CorneringArtist (Post 7164673)
+1 for 4runner. but I hear that some of the V6's are POS'es, and people switch to or try to find the 4-banger version.

Can anyone elaborate?

the 3.0L from 87-95 is a bit of a POS if you get an auto tranny. They had shitty headgaskets from the factory and were a factory recall.
the 3.4L V6 in the 96+ is the motor to get... lots of power and not too hard on gas.
The 2.4L is damn near bulletproof and good for around town and minor hauling and good on gas. I prefer the V6 for power.

FerrariEnzo 10-29-2010 03:35 AM

so pretty much from '96 and on....

!Aznboi128 10-29-2010 05:20 AM

96+ 4runner's still are quite pricey. I would say get a pathfinder the 3.3 from 95-99 is pretty good and doesn't have a jacked up price of a 4runner.
Posted via RS Mobile

1BADMR2 10-29-2010 05:25 AM

.

Mugen EvOlutioN 10-29-2010 08:30 AM

4 runner definitely gets my vote, very reliable and nice off road capability

Volvo-brickster 10-29-2010 09:39 AM

I have a 92 pathfinder...no real issues other than regular maintenance and what comes with owning an older car. Just stay away from AT pathy and check for frame rot
Posted via RS Mobile

RRxtar 10-29-2010 09:41 AM

you could pick up a 92 jeep cherokee with a 4.0L I6 for like $500 and it will run for 500,000kms

or for more creature comforts find a 93-98 grand cherokee with a v8. 96-98 had an facelift

or if you like japanese you cant go wrong with a 4runner

i would stay away from jimmys/blazers

asahai69 10-29-2010 10:00 AM

if your gonna get a jeep. stay away from the ones with a V8. the I6 is far more reliable. those engines were bullet proof. we had a 97 grand cherokee. ran for over 300,000km with only the water pump going bad. sumone hit it last year and it got written off or we would still have it.

alwaysideways 10-29-2010 10:54 AM

Have you given any thought to a CRV?

OTG-ZR2 10-29-2010 10:55 AM

If you want something cheap and dependable get a blazer or jimmy .

There solid trucks, the 4.3L V6 is one of the best motors GM ever made its a scaled down version of a 350ci or 5.7L. The autos (700R4) are solid too. Standards (NV3500?) are better yet.

I own a 95 s10 zr2, daily driver, off roader, toy hauler, and its seen allot of abuse. Nothing major has failed yet at 240k. Original motor, tranny, diff's, transfer case. Parts are common and dirt cheap for these trucks anyways.

Gh0stRider 10-29-2010 10:57 AM

I like the old 4runners. I was gonna get one.
Posted via RS Mobile


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net