Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |  | |
11-06-2010, 10:11 AM
|
#26 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,918
Thanked 1,825 Times in 523 Posts
Failed 276 Times in 88 Posts
|
reading this makes me want a cheeseburger
|
| |
11-06-2010, 10:17 AM
|
#27 | Banned (BBM)
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
|
i want mac nuggets
|
| |
11-06-2010, 10:25 AM
|
#28 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: n zone
Posts: 2,660
Thanked 1,910 Times in 606 Posts
Failed 325 Times in 112 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNewGirl The problem is that by putting toys in it and putting it in a colorful bag it makes it look less threatening than it is. A chef I know explained to me that 'kids menus' in general are one of marketing's best inventions and nutrition's worst advesaries. And if you look on kids menus even in resterants they tend to be filled with the most unhealthy options that resteraunt has to offer (chicken strips, hamburgers, greasy cheese pizzas).
Many are getting better and offering differant choices of sides and such, but so long children (and parents, we grew up on kids meals too if we were raised in north america) are engrained with the notion that hamburgers and fries are kids fare that's what they'll continue to choose.
It's a cycle that has to be broken, and it's a greater problem then just the parent and child in question as here in Canada, you and I are going to be paying for the health care for the fat kid that's diabetic at 10 or 12 because of what they've been eatting. From that perspective it is everyone's problem.
I don't like banning anything but I think forbidding the toys to be packaged in with the meal and the distractingly colorful packaging is a step in the right direction in this case. I wish they'd do the same here. | i'm glad there aren't more people like you that live here then
its ridiculous how the government can restrict what a business can sell when its not illegal, harmful etc merely because they believe it's associated with obesity
people are fat from not exercising, you can eat as healthy as you want and get fat if you don't
|
| |
11-06-2010, 10:35 AM
|
#29 | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Vancity
Posts: 467
Thanked 531 Times in 138 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 28 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNewGirl The problem is that by putting toys in it and putting it in a colorful bag it makes it look less threatening than it is. A chef I know explained to me that 'kids menus' in general are one of marketing's best inventions and nutrition's worst advesaries. And if you look on kids menus even in resterants they tend to be filled with the most unhealthy options that resteraunt has to offer (chicken strips, hamburgers, greasy cheese pizzas).
Many are getting better and offering differant choices of sides and such, but so long children (and parents, we grew up on kids meals too if we were raised in north america) are engrained with the notion that hamburgers and fries are kids fare that's what they'll continue to choose.
It's a cycle that has to be broken, and it's a greater problem then just the parent and child in question as here in Canada, you and I are going to be paying for the health care for the fat kid that's diabetic at 10 or 12 because of what they've been eatting. From that perspective it is everyone's problem.
I don't like banning anything but I think forbidding the toys to be packaged in with the meal and the distractingly colorful packaging is a step in the right direction in this case. I wish they'd do the same here. | Then its your job as a parent to explain to your child that these "distractingly packaged" meals with toys are actually bad. Everybody needs to do their part and actually PARENT. Tell your kid why its bad and if they still yell and scream for it, set boundaries. Or if they're quite active, reward them with one every now and then. There is nothing that can't be done on the parent side. Healthy food is for sure more expensive, but there are still cheaper and healthier alternatives to the happy meal at the supermarket. Growing up all my mom could afford to feed me with was ham sandwiches day in and day out. She didn't use the best ham or the best bread, but you bet it worked out cheaper and healthier than a happy meal. Nor did it take very long to buy or make and she constantly juggled two jobs. Making your kid go outside to play instead of parked in front of the tv would also help.
People need to stop passing blame onto others and banning everything to try to solve their problems.
/rant
|
| |
11-06-2010, 11:39 AM
|
#30 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 468
Thanked 85 Times in 54 Posts
Failed 1,211 Times in 285 Posts
|
I dont know whats worse, governments (FDA) that allow the sale of neurotoxic food to infants or brainwashed people that defend it.
|
| |
11-06-2010, 02:41 PM
|
#31 | I'm better than you.
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: East Van
Posts: 8,480
Thanked 3,087 Times in 658 Posts
Failed 373 Times in 115 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNewGirl The problem is that by putting toys in it and putting it in a colorful bag it makes it look less threatening than it is. A chef I know explained to me that 'kids menus' in general are one of marketing's best inventions and nutrition's worst advesaries. And if you look on kids menus even in resterants they tend to be filled with the most unhealthy options that resteraunt has to offer (chicken strips, hamburgers, greasy cheese pizzas).
Many are getting better and offering differant choices of sides and such, but so long children (and parents, we grew up on kids meals too if we were raised in north america) are engrained with the notion that hamburgers and fries are kids fare that's what they'll continue to choose.
It's a cycle that has to be broken, and it's a greater problem then just the parent and child in question as here in Canada, you and I are going to be paying for the health care for the fat kid that's diabetic at 10 or 12 because of what they've been eatting. From that perspective it is everyone's problem.
I don't like banning anything but I think forbidding the toys to be packaged in with the meal and the distractingly colorful packaging is a step in the right direction in this case. I wish they'd do the same here. | then go to mcdonalds and order some apple dippers or w/e they are lol
__________________
'14 Toyota Yaris [Work Daily]
'89 Toyota Cressida MX83 [Collector's status]
'15 Honda Ruckus [Summer cruiser]
'96 Toyota Hilux Surf KZN185 [Weekend Warrior] Buy & Sell Ratings! |
| |
11-06-2010, 02:53 PM
|
#32 | not the mod you're looking for
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,744
Thanked 1,537 Times in 556 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 32 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by wstce92 Then its your job as a parent to explain to your child that these "distractingly packaged" meals with toys are actually bad. Everybody needs to do their part and actually PARENT. Tell your kid why its bad and if they still yell and scream for it, set boundaries. Or if they're quite active, reward them with one every now and then. There is nothing that can't be done on the parent side. Healthy food is for sure more expensive, but there are still cheaper and healthier alternatives to the happy meal at the supermarket. Growing up all my mom could afford to feed me with was ham sandwiches day in and day out. She didn't use the best ham or the best bread, but you bet it worked out cheaper and healthier than a happy meal. Nor did it take very long to buy or make and she constantly juggled two jobs. Making your kid go outside to play instead of parked in front of the tv would also help.
People need to stop passing blame onto others and banning everything to try to solve their problems.
/rant | I agree. Just because your kids want it, doesn't mean they can have it. It's ultimately the responsibility of the parents, and not the restaurant.
Although I believe they had good intentions in removing the toys from happy meals, the steps to do it were completely wrong. People still have the right to choose between the right and wrong decisions.
|
| |
11-06-2010, 02:59 PM
|
#33 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,963
Thanked 362 Times in 161 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 49 Posts
|
I ordered a big mac (no cheese) for the first time since 1999. Holy shit, the thing shrank by 30%!!!!
On a side note, they might as well BAN fat people while they're at it!!!
__________________ 2011 VW Tiguan Highline 4Motion (Canada) 2013 Lexus IS350 F-Sport (Melbourne) |
| |
11-06-2010, 03:31 PM
|
#34 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: n zone
Posts: 2,660
Thanked 1,910 Times in 606 Posts
Failed 325 Times in 112 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Arash I dont know whats worse, governments (FDA) that allow the sale of neurotoxic food to infants or brainwashed people that defend it. | wait you're calling other people brainwashed when your defending the restriction of personal liberty? Strong irony Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
11-06-2010, 03:32 PM
|
#35 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 468
Thanked 85 Times in 54 Posts
Failed 1,211 Times in 285 Posts
|
You call serving poison a personal liberty? get your facts right Quote:
Originally Posted by iRomey I agree. Just because your kids want it, doesn't mean they can have it. It's ultimately the responsibility of the parents, and not the restaurant.
Although I believe they had good intentions in removing the toys from happy meals, the steps to do it were completely wrong. People still have the right to choose between the right and wrong decisions. | Did you ever see the Simpson's cartoon where the school milk was replaced with rats milk? If no one tells you its rats milk and that it only makes you fat in the long term, is it your fault for letting your future kids have it?
Last edited by Arash; 11-06-2010 at 03:38 PM.
|
| |
11-06-2010, 10:47 PM
|
#36 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,308
Thanked 825 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 203 Times in 77 Posts
|
for rich kids there's no excuse for being obese from mcdonalds, other than bad parenting.
if u look at the states, a lot of the obese kids come from shit-income urban areas, where there is a mcdonalds on every block, but no proper grocery store in sight. And even that's not an excuse - when I was a poor kid growing up, my parents would only allow McDonalds on special occasions!
But why not make vegetables more readily available instead of taking away happy meals? Hell, why not give out toys with veggies instead, if if toys are such a good vehicle to entice kids? lol
|
| |
11-06-2010, 11:36 PM
|
#37 | Ask me about how I answered the question "How fat is TOO fat?"
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,141
Thanked 4,146 Times in 1,143 Posts
Failed 1,392 Times in 247 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Vicious i'm glad there aren't more people like you that live here then
its ridiculous how the government can restrict what a business can sell when its not illegal, harmful etc merely because they believe it's associated with obesity
people are fat from not exercising, you can eat as healthy as you want and get fat if you don't | Just because you exercise and eat all the shit you want doesnt mean you'll get all the nutrients you need. A person can be incredibly skinny and eat mcdonalds but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are healthy. Happy meals have zero nutritional value. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 PM. |