REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-15-2010, 02:52 AM   #51
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,243
Thanked 29 Times in 12 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by originalhypa View Post
exactly.
That's what people fail to understand. There are costs that need to be paid, and the only way the gov't can do it is with some major form of consumption tax. These referendums are a complete waste of time and money. Of course people are going to vote down any tax.

Then what?
Its not the people's fault. The government need to understand there should be other sources of revenue other then taxation. Govern the property tax for example, import taxation of foreign country products. Regulate the city's infrastructure, facilities and transport systems thru market competition, not monopolization, etc.
Advertisement
__________________
My Buy/Sell Feedback
BoredAtWork is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-15-2010, 09:21 AM   #52
Banned By Establishment
 
Gridlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New West
Posts: 3,998
Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 109 Posts
That's what made me laugh in the mid-term elections state side.

The Tea Party wanted to shrink the budget, eliminate deficits and lower taxes.

Great plan.

Anytime they were asked, what are you going to cut?

Defense? Nope, we believe in a strong America
Medicare? Nope...we believe in a healthy America
Education? No.
Infrastructure? No.

So what then? Well, gov't in general. No one can mention one substantial program to cut.

It's the same here...lower taxes and no cuts to social programs and maintain a balanced budget.

How about I can offer you two of the three?
Gridlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 09:59 AM   #53
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,106
Thanked 2,654 Times in 1,194 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredAtWork View Post
Its not the people's fault. The government need to understand there should be other sources of revenue other then taxation. Govern the property tax for example, import taxation of foreign country products. Regulate the city's infrastructure, facilities and transport systems thru market competition, not monopolization, etc.
Different levels of government control these services. Do you happen to pay property tax yourself? If you did, you would already know it's "governed" by your municipal politicians.

And are you really serious about opening a city's infrastructure to privatization?
Tapioca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 08:48 PM   #54
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,243
Thanked 29 Times in 12 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapioca View Post
Different levels of government control these services. Do you happen to pay property tax yourself? If you did, you would already know it's "governed" by your municipal politicians.

And are you really serious about opening a city's infrastructure to privatization?
I agree that different levels of government already control these services. Its a matter of how they control it. You build up a huge multi layer bureaucracy, and pay them overly high wages for doing squat, its bound to fail. Look at most capitalistic societies, and how they run the system.

Why not open city's infrastructure up to privatization? As long as its properly managed, its a win win situation. Privatization means letting stakeholders run the system, instead of fat asses who "think up" idiotic ideas without a tight grip on estimating costs, budgets, and impact. and when it fails, they just slap their fat asses and move on up their corporate chain. Think Translink.

Did you know all the Japanese rail and transport system revscene is so fond of and so well built are all privatized? Even highways, and tunnels.

Another example is the MTR and bus systems in Hong Kong, considered also to be one of the most efficient in the world. Its cheaper and faster (interms of getting from A to B, not speed) then anything in Canada. That too is privatized. As are most Electric, Gas companies in these societies.
__________________
My Buy/Sell Feedback
BoredAtWork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 09:04 PM   #55
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
^^ but what does this have anything to do with HST and the discussion in this thread....?
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 11:59 PM   #56
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Jackygor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,345
Thanked 736 Times in 159 Posts
Failed 89 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredAtWork View Post
I agree that different levels of government already control these services. Its a matter of how they control it. You build up a huge multi layer bureaucracy, and pay them overly high wages for doing squat, its bound to fail. Look at most capitalistic societies, and how they run the system.

Why not open city's infrastructure up to privatization? As long as its properly managed, its a win win situation. Privatization means letting stakeholders run the system, instead of fat asses who "think up" idiotic ideas without a tight grip on estimating costs, budgets, and impact. and when it fails, they just slap their fat asses and move on up their corporate chain. Think Translink.

Did you know all the Japanese rail and transport system revscene is so fond of and so well built are all privatized? Even highways, and tunnels.

Another example is the MTR and bus systems in Hong Kong, considered also to be one of the most efficient in the world. Its cheaper and faster (interms of getting from A to B, not speed) then anything in Canada. That too is privatized. As are most Electric, Gas companies in these societies.
A very big maybe right there. The less regulations in what we call a "free market" the more prevalent the boom and bust effect has on the economy. You have listed the positive of privatization, yes things is almost more efficiently run that way, however, the situation in Canada is much different from Japan or Hong Kong. In Canada, we have to protect ourselves from the corporate power houses of the United States, if the Canadian government deregulates certain laws to allow for more privatizations, we would have things built in Canada, imported to the states, and sold back to us at an significantly higher cost. Prime example would be Chrysters 300C, built in Ontario, I believe, and then sold back to us at a higher cost than it does in the states. On a related note on privatization vs regulations, milk companies in the states are allow to inject a growth hormone (rBGH) to their cows in order to produce more milk. Studies after studies have shown that it increase the chances of breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, etc. Due to the lack of regulations in diary industry in the states, these hormones are allowed to be used, however, in country such as Canada, and actually the rest of Europe, where the government leans more towards the right side of the political spectrum, these hormones are banned. Milk, of course, is cheaper in the states, but at the cost of potential health hazard? I will pass. Oh, and the eggs, they are probably pretty fuck up too.

http://www.preventcancer.com/consumers/general/milk.htm

/off topic

It makes no sense to get rid of HST now since it is has already been implemented. It is also a waste of MONEY, as it is previously mentioned, and time just to, again, sugar coat some bullshit so it is easier to swallow. We all need to pay for whatever is already spent, there is no way out of this, unless you move out of BC. In a scenario such as this, it is ass backward to spend money to save money. At this point I support HST, and I lament how shittily it was sold to us.
Jackygor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 09:52 AM   #57
Prince of the Apes
 
bloodmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 2,469
Thanked 3,046 Times in 672 Posts
Failed 1,163 Times in 238 Posts
We need a nuclear fallout to happen so we can stop bitching and start living
bloodmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 11:48 AM   #58
I don't get it
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: vancouver
Posts: 422
Thanked 259 Times in 88 Posts
Failed 282 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodmack View Post
We need a nuclear fallout to happen so we can stop bitching and start living
I'd rather pay more for my food than fight for it.
darkfroggy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-16-2010, 11:56 AM   #59
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
q0192837465's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,760
Thanked 375 Times in 181 Posts
Failed 159 Times in 63 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkfroggy View Post
I'd rather pay more for my food than fight for it.
That's just you. Warlords like me have food handed to us.
__________________
Ignorance is bliss

How I wish I can remain ignorant, why do I know so much?
q0192837465 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 02:26 PM   #60
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by originalhypa View Post
exactly.
That's what people fail to understand. There are costs that need to be paid, and the only way the gov't can do it is with some major form of consumption tax. These referendums are a complete waste of time and money. Of course people are going to vote down any tax.

Then what?
Wow, about the only time I'll agree with OH.

The government has a choice of taxes: income, corporate, consumption, ... I would prefer consumption taxes raised and like that income taxes will be lower next year.

I would like to see a more European VAT that is variable depending on what you buy. Less VAT on necessities, more VAT on luxuries.
taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 02:28 PM   #61
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by johny View Post
wasn't the HST revenue netreal??.... why would they need to increase other taxes if removed? are you saying they were lying
You're not paying attention. The government gave BC $1.6B to enact the HST, which closes a big hole in our budget. If this is given back, this hole must be closed with more taxes.
taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 02:33 PM   #62
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapioca View Post
This is a classic example of why you can't have a discussion about taxes (or most other public initiatives for that matter) because most people can't even get the facts straight before they voice an opinion.

The HST has nothing to do with bike lanes in Vancouver. If you want to talk bike lanes, maybe you should vote someone else other than Vision Vancouver in the next civic election? Oh wait, you don't even live in the City of Vancouver...
I'm glad you said it - if I had I probably wouldn't have been as nice and been banned again from AC/OT

taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 04:08 PM   #63
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,679
Thanked 10,395 Times in 3,918 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
Liberals repealing that Tax Discount for $72k earners

just announced on CBCNews
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 05:42 PM   #64
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: poco
Posts: 1,152
Thanked 251 Times in 82 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by StylinRed View Post
Liberals repealing that Tax Discount for $72k earners

just announced on CBCNews

yup here it is

http://www.news1130.com/news/local/a...-tax-reduction

VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - The proverbial carrot that Premier Gordon Campbell dangled in front of millions of British Columbians has been suddenly yanked away.
Two weeks after Gordon Campbell stepped down as the Premier of British Columbia, the BC Government's Executive Council has decided to suspend the 15 per cent reduction in personal income tax rates for the first $72,000 of personal income that was promised in Campbell's televised address last month.
Quoting the outgoing premier in a statement released today, the Executive Council says, "in order to ensure the Executive Council has maximum flexibility to set government's economic and fiscal agenda, Cabinet has decided to suspend the planned tax reduction."

NDP Leader Carole James says, "To pull back on that tax cut now, it shows that the government is entirely focused on damage control, on their own problems, and sadly it's British Columbians who are hurting because of that."

The Canadian Federation for Independent Business has also reacted saying it's very disappointed to learn that they say politics has trumped good public policy and has created unnecessary uncertainty for businesses.

The tax reduction would have taken effect January 1 of next year, provided it received legislative approval. It would have become the second largest personal income tax relief measure in BC's history.

Campbell says the government will still roll out a throne speech and budget in early February, but won't announce any programs until a new party leader is chosen later that month.

There will also be what the Executive Council calls a "status quo" budget, with no new initiatives beyond what is statutorily required.
__________________
2014 SWP Impreza 5dr Sport
2012 cannondale supersix w/sram red

2005 G35 Coupe - sold
kayceeee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 05:51 PM   #65
regulator
 
jigga250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,738
Thanked 250 Times in 102 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 44 Posts
bunch of liars and crooks

__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.HappySilp
^^ I think u seen jeus..... Lol. u shouldn't be scare of jeus.
jigga250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 05:53 PM   #66
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
mikemhg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,894
Thanked 6,658 Times in 2,448 Posts
Failed 286 Times in 122 Posts
Jeez I don't see any chance of the Liberal getting in again for a while. HST, and now a cop out on the proposed Income Tax cut.
mikemhg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 05:55 PM   #67
regulator
 
jigga250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,738
Thanked 250 Times in 102 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 44 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemhg View Post
Jeez I don't see any chance of the Liberal getting in again for a while. HST, and now a cop out on the proposed Income Tax cut.
and thats completely ignoring the semi-retarded drinking and driving fiasco
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.HappySilp
^^ I think u seen jeus..... Lol. u shouldn't be scare of jeus.
jigga250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 06:14 PM   #68
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,803
Thanked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Failed 17 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 View Post
Wow, about the only time I'll agree with OH.

The government has a choice of taxes: income, corporate, consumption, ... I would prefer consumption taxes raised and like that income taxes will be lower next year.

I would like to see a more European VAT that is variable depending on what you buy. Less VAT on necessities, more VAT on luxuries.
There is also poll taxes and wealth taxes.

And the HST does vary depending on the product.
misteranswer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 06:41 PM   #69
reads most threads with his pants around his ankles, especially in the Forced Induction forum.
 
Mr.HappySilp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,645
Thanked 2,191 Times in 1,131 Posts
Failed 929 Times in 340 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemhg View Post
Jeez I don't see any chance of the Liberal getting in again for a while. HST, and now a cop out on the proposed Income Tax cut.
NDP and Carole James would be worse lol. Handing out money to the poor and taxing heavily on the riches and the medium class. How many of these riches and medium will stay here then? O and yea as Carole James said she won't cut any programs, she will cut taxes but then where is the money come from? Do they grow on trees?
Mr.HappySilp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 12:20 AM   #70
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemhg View Post
Jeez I don't see any chance of the Liberal getting in again for a while. HST, and now a cop out on the proposed Income Tax cut.
I'd love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. I think they know the HST is going to be defeated in a referendum, cause really, who wants to vote to pay more tax? Thus to stay in power they'd have to undo the HST, which would leave a huge hole in the budget - adding income tax cuts only makes the hole wider.

What I'd want to know is why they proposed income tax cuts in the first place.
taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 01:02 PM   #71
they call me the snowman
 
originalhypa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: online
Posts: 19,749
Thanked 3,993 Times in 1,374 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 91 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 View Post
What I'd want to know is why they proposed income tax cuts in the first place.
The only thing I could think of is this.



I think we're the donkey.
originalhypa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 06:09 PM   #72
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
mikemhg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,894
Thanked 6,658 Times in 2,448 Posts
Failed 286 Times in 122 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 View Post
I'd love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. I think they know the HST is going to be defeated in a referendum, cause really, who wants to vote to pay more tax? Thus to stay in power they'd have to undo the HST, which would leave a huge hole in the budget - adding income tax cuts only makes the hole wider.

What I'd want to know is why they proposed income tax cuts in the first place.
I would vote to keep the HST, if the Income tax cut was put through accordingly. Since it's off the table at this point, of course the HST will end up being repealed.

Liberals completely botched this entire thing, the NDP are not better, but I will say they completely screwed themselves out of the next election.
mikemhg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net