![]() |
say goodbye to 15% income tax cut Jan 1 B.C. suspends 15% income tax cut Quote:
|
Why can't the Fiberals be honest for once and say, "cabinet has decided to cancel the planned tax reduction". |
|
more or less expected, with them seeing defeat in the HST legislation. Gordo, if only you knew how to lay it on to ppl like Ont. you're still be premier. A hated one just the same, but not 9% approval rating fame. |
should keep that one and cancel the referendum |
Is there any chance we aren't going to have to endure 10 years of NDP gov't? Can they possibly take their party out of the crapper enough to actually fight? Or is it time to give all our money to the poor again? |
Quote:
Please don't compare BC to ON, McGuinty has ruined that province and jacked taxes through the roof. Within 6 months of taking power I was slapped with a $750 health care "fee" so they could avoid the "tax" moniker. |
that definitely sucks |
I don't know why this is shocking. It was clearly a desperate attempt for Gordo to regain his credibility and it failed. The government can't afford to cut your income taxes. In fact if the HST is shot down they will likely have to increase income taxes as an off set. |
the government gets the most revenue from income tax, so the cut was too good to be true in the first place |
Libs or NDP, either way we'r screwed. |
Quote:
I put up with a lot of Liberal crap, because (imho) they're doing what needs to be done to this province. Infrastructure to keep up with growth. Better ideas for the medical industry, and most of all the income tax cut. I can choose not to consume, therefore not pay HST. But taking from my paycheck is a different story. Now even if I want to consume, I have less money to do so with. Quote:
McGuinty came in with the attitude of change, but their ideologies are screwed. From his insane driving laws, to his massive tax increases, to buying out his political buddies debt, ie; GM, he screwed Canada's most powerful province and put them damn in a bad situation. Quote:
Damned if we do, damned if we don't. :( |
that's what you fucking whiners get for bitching about the HST that doesn't even affect you! Anyone here that bitched about the HSt really even affected by it? Do you eat at restaurants that much to lose that much money? The majority of everything else you buy had gst pst anyways |
But seriously, do you think the vote they will get enough vote for abolishing the HST? It is convenient to sign a petition, even if u have no idea wut u'r signing. But to actually take responsibility is a different issue. TBH, I don't see HST being voted down. We really got shafted both ways this time, less money + more tax. |
If it weren't for the HST tanking Gordo's popularity rating he wouldn't have ever promised the cuts in the first place. So you haven't lost anything income tax savings cause of the HST 'whiners'. It never would have been on the table if they hadn't whined and in the end it all nulls out. |
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
No. I would have ideally liked it if the government NOT lied about the costs associated with the Olympics and planned in advance how to pay for them. I would have liked it if furthermore they'd been upfront about the impact of the HST and tried to sell it on its merits, not lies. And I would have liked it if my government had not tried to buy us off with a bullshit income tax deduction that anyone with a brain knew they couldn't afford. At the end of the day I would like it if they maintained the HST but lowered it to 11% then it would genuinely be a neutral tax shift as the government had claimed it would be while still accomplishing the task of creating a tax credit for the whole amount which frees up cash flow which is vital for small businesses. Additionally it would be a huge draw for big businesses. Most people don't know that large companies are capped on their HST input credits so while the liberals claim that the HST was intended to draw them, it actually only has a limited advantage here. Having lower point of sales taxes on what they can't claim would help off set that. And you know what, if, in Gordon Campbell's address he had promised that instead of trying to buy us all off with the aforementioned income tax break, I and a lot of people I imagine probably would have 'Okay'. And it all would have gone away. But it didn't. Regardless of what happens with the HST, unfortunately either your Income Taxes or your MSP premiums are going to have to go up (again) because despite claims of being economically responsible, the Government has not provided sufficent oversight for healthcare spending and the health authorities are, yet again, in the red. /rant |
Sorry TheNewGirl... Are you pro-HST now? I remember you complaining that the HST was the worse move the Liberals ever made. I even remember you saying you signed the anti-HST petition. The same petition that is costing this province millions. I think you signed the first week it came out. Not trying to be an ass... But it seems you are flipping more than a fish out of water. :confused: |
Quote:
The one thing I don't understand is it says if more then 50% vote it out they'll remove it. Is that 50% of people that actually vote or 50% of the BC population? |
How is the next year going to go? Well: 1. I think we will have a double-dip recession. Again, Canada won't be hit as hard, but we'll have a bunch of people hold back on spending again to make up for it. 2. That will fuck our situation even more. Then: 3. We have a vote on the HST, unless that gets suspended too. The No side will win. There is so much bad blood in how this thing was introduced and handled that it will be a knee jerk reaction on behalf of the population-and I think I'm one of them, even if the old system cost me more on the biz side..I hate being lied to. 4. We either drop it to 10% (which they should have done on intorduction) and some of the bad blood goes away, or scrap it and pay through the nose Leading to: 5. Higher taxes! So...better to "raise" the taxes now, or at least not lower them while they are already in the dumps. And inevitably: 6. The NDP will win the election and the cycle will start again. They'll be a refreshing change and be doing these great things, and suddenly they will lose favour when they start(continue?) tabling deficit budgets from their social programs. PS...just change the party names and whatever spending issue, and it works federally too. |
Quote:
Does not matter who flip flops. As long as we all comprehend. HST is for the better. As for the tax cut. It's not over yet. There's still a possiblity of tax cuts. For all we know, this could just be another political tactic. Take it away from us now. New premier introduces another tax cut. Liberals look like semi heroes again. |
^^ LOL tax cuts. Not in BC. You are lucky if they don't raise taxes here. I think after feb or March there will be job loses and this leads to more EI. So ppl will spend less, which leads to more business firing ppl, less ppl sepnds, gov is getting less income, HST..... so therefore the gov either needs to raise tax or cut programs. Overall I think it is best to spend less now and save as much as you can before it gets worse. |
Quote:
money is conserve... if they reduce tax from your income, they prolly take it back from your other income source...:blushsmile: |
Quote:
So I think the ideal compromise, really the only viable solution is to keep it but lower the provincial portion by 1 point which will actually allow it to do what it's supposed to but avoid us, the tax payers, having to pay back that 1.9 Billion the province has already spent. Not that the government really seems to be interested in viable solutions. |
Quote:
I realize that you've discussed your situation with your children on here before, etc. and I understand why it's costing you more. Parents, like everyone else, still have the choice to consume what services they need for their kids. Not every kid needs after-school services and not every kid needs to take piano lessons, etc. I'll shed a little light on my childhood and tell people here why I don't think families are as hard done by as they think they are. I walked to and from school everyday since the age of 6. I didn't need after-school care, nor did I need to be enrolled in activities to have a "childhood." The only thing that I was enrolled in growing up was swimming lessons and had they been taxed an additional 7% in those days, I'm sure my parents wouldn't have broken the bank. I played street hockey to pass the time and guess what? My skates, my sticks, goalie pads, etc. were taxed 14% at the time. In terms of PST-free clothing, I got maybe one or two pairs of shoes per year, a pair of jeans, and maybe a couple of shirts a year. That's it. Then again, my family ate out very sparingly and we went on vacations maybe once every 3-4 years. /rant |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net