You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Vancouver Off-Topic / Current EventsThe off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.
That is kind of misleading as he was using whole numbers and a number that is easily doubled... being 25. Had that been a number that was odd like say 17 the number would not so easily have been doubled and would have required more thought to do the calculations.
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Van
Posts: 911
Thanked 951 Times in 145 Posts
^ very true. Although it's not the most efficient way to do multiplication it's still a very easy concept to comprehend to. I wonder what the math teachers would be like if a few elementary kids did this on tests and shit lol. Would they get marks off for not showing "work"..
yeah, just testing this myself, I already got stumped cause I gave myself a random question off the top of my head. 22x37...
double 37... I would have to make another binary chart to figure out 37x2 first and so forth
So doubling 37 = 74, 148, 296, 592
The answer to my qusetion is 814... but adding the "circled numbers", 74 + 148 + 592
too a while to do own it's own.
Definitely not faster than the method we learnt in elementary school.